Review: Parenthood on Display in ‘Life in Pieces’

CBS’s new sitcom Life in Pieces is being accused already of being a Modern Family knock-off. And maybe it is on the lowest of levels – a multi-generational family loves, laughs, and waxes philosophically about life itself. Having a Yet, there’s something more there, hidden beneath all the crude sex jokes and manufactured touching family moments that makes me wonder if the show couldn’t aspire to something greater given time.

Dianne Wiest (Hannah and Her SistersParenthood) and James Brolin (Hotel) star as John and Joan Short, the parents of this modern family. He is aging in a wacky, sitcom-y manner rather than go the much more gruff path of Ed O’Neill’s Jay Pritchett in Modern Family. The worst joke of the pilot involves his funeral-inspired birthday party which goes down poorly after multiple vignettes of sex jokes. Brolin’s brief performance in the pilot makes me long for the subtle comic timing of O’Neill, but Wiest, given very little to do here until the end, brings the matronly warmth she employed brilliantly in the film version of Parenthood. As with most things she’s in, Wiest is easily the best thing about the show, making her an potential candidate for next year’s Emmys. That is, if the writers give her enough to do…

The rest of the family, thus far, is more of a mixed bag:

  • Their son, Matt (Thomas Sadoski), is dating Colleen (Angelique Cabral) but they can’t find a place to have sex. He apparently lives with his parents. She lives with her ex-fiancee (Jordan Peele) and can’t afford her own place. Wackiness ensues. This is my least favorite couple thus far, which is slightly unfair given they’re saddled with standard sitcom cliches galore.
  • Their other son, Greg (Colin Hanks), and his wife, Jen (Zoe Lister-Jones), are having their first baby. This is the section that I found offered significant potential given Hanks’s genetic affability and the admittedly well-trodden comic territory of parenthood.
  • Their other, other son, Tim (Dan Bakkedahl), and wife Heather (Betsy Brandt) are far advanced in their child raising. Their struggles include taking their oldest son to look at colleges, dealing with their middle daughter’s period, and telling their youngest daughter the dark truth about Santa. Somehow, through all of this, Heather wants another child, but Tim infers she’s too old for that. I’m somewhere in the middle on these two. I have a hard time with Betsy Brandt as a comic actress, honestly. I’m always aware that she’s TRYING REALLY HARD TO BE WACKY. I never liked her on Breaking Bad either. No offense.

So, the pilot of Life in Pieces is just that, a pilot that leaps dramatically to introduce the audience to all characters within the confines of a 25-minute time slot. Pilots are never great. They are nurtured and grow to become great, and, assuming the writers give the characters the appropriate room to breathe, the show could become very good, if not great. That all depends on, in my opinion, how much screen time they give Diane Wiest, the key to the family and its beating heart. The show may have genetic ties to Modern Family, but its emotional core is more akin to Parenthood, less dramatic than the series and more broadly comic like the film. And, if the writers of Life in Pieces are able to pull off that trick, then this show may prove a pleasant new destination in Fall television.

Life in Pieces airs Monday nights on CBS at 8:30pm ET. Right after The Big Bang Theory. Because that makes no sense at all.

Review: Fox’s ‘Minority Report’

It may be damning praise to say that Fox’s Minority Report is the happy victim of lowered expectations. Given the popularity and critical acclaim of the 2002 Steven Spielberg film upon which it is based, many thought the television series would surely pale in comparison both thematically and creatively. To its credit, it doesn’t even try to aim that high. Instead, it uses the original film as a jumping off point and applies Sleepy Hollow‘s framework to evolve into a fairly intelligent and always entertaining show. Based on the pilot, Minority Report technical categories could buy it a ticket to next year’s Emmy ceremony, but nothing else seen thus far merits significant awards conversation.

The Minority Report series picks up several years after the original film ended where pre-cogs Dash (Stark Sands of Broadway’s Kinky Boots), Arthur (the yet-to-be-seen Nick Zano, Happy Endings), and Agatha (Laura Regan, Mad Men) were secluded in an isolated cabin, protected from the world still reeling from the negative affects of the pre-cog program. An interesting side note for those who remember disliking the optimistic ending of the original film over the more pessimistic ending where Tom Cruise’s character was placed in the cryogenic “halo” stasis tube and forgotten will find that the television series firmly confirms the more idyllic ending as the actual ending of the story. Tired of living in isolation, Dash flees the island and moves back to Washington, DC, living off the grid thanks to his pre-cognative gifts. Unfortunately, Dash’s abilities work best when paired with the missing Arthur, so Dash can only see brief glimpses of an upcoming crime. He partners with tough, no-nonsense Detective Lara Vega (Meagan Good, Eve’s Bayou) to attempt to solve crimes before they happen. It has to be on the down-low, though, as pre-cognition as a method of crime solving is now illegal.

The pilot gets off to a very shaky start with Sands’s Dash frantically running through the city attempting to stop the crime he envisions independently, yet failing miserably. The slap-dash editing intends to heighten our sense of urgency and paranoia, but it becomes headache-inducing and ultimately distracting. It finally settles into a more routine rhythm, and the story is allowed to take over. Sands is the breakout here, giving a tricky performance that could easily devolve into annoying ticks. His Dash has yet to grow into the real world given his unique upbringing, and Sands effectively conveys the struggle to connect with a world not easily understood. He does tend to wander around with a hurt puppy dog look in his eyes, though – something I’m hoping he grows out of. Good as Vega is fine given the limitations of her role, which feels like a carbon copy of Nicole Beharie’s work on Fox’s other sci-fi/fantasy show Sleepy Hollow. To be fair, the core situations are remarkably identical – the no-nonsense cop partners with an individual out of time and place to solve crimes. This appears to be a pattern partnership over at Fox these days. Her initial scenes were all dedicated to exploring futuristic technology, the kind of dramatic hand-swiping forecasted in the original film but comically enhanced with a kind of slo-mo, Vogue-y flair. Let’s have less of that please.

As a series, Minority Report is far better than I ever imagined it would be, as long as you’re willing to divorce yourself from the merits of the original film. They have easily established a series arc – the disappearance of Dash’s brother Arthur – that can be propped up by weekly crime solving through Dash’s blossoming precognitive abilities. That’s a good thing, too, as the series looks incredibly expensive. Its special effects and cinematography are near-cinematic level which helps lend credibility to the overall effect. Still, Sleepy Hollow fizzled creatively after a year in production, so here’s hoping Minority Report is able to evade that fate.

Minority Report premieres tonight at 9pm ET on Fox.

X-Files Flashback: ‘Unruhe’

Season 4, Episode 4
Director: Rob Bowman
Writer: Vince Gilligan

You know you’re in good hands when Vince Gilligan is writing your screenplay. Having the benefit of known Gilligan from his excellence on Breaking Bad and Better Call Saul, you know the man can write and plot a suspenseful yarn. His early days on The X-Files are no different, and his latest offering – “Unruhe” – is an excellent example of a man honing his screenwriting craft.

The basic storyline of the episode involves a serial killer who is kidnapping unconnected women and giving them exceedingly unprofessional frontal lobotomies. The twist in the episode is that the man’s damaged psyche projects itself onto any nearby strip of camera film. Whether caught or not, many victims’ fate is recorded well in advance of it actually happening. After two women go missing and turn up lobotomized and their boyfriends murdered, Mulder and Scully search for the killer in two disparate methods: Scully makes a connection to a local construction company, and Mulder digs into the mysterious photographs, picking up clues to the killer’s identity along the way.

Scully finally apprehends Gerry Schnauz (Pruitt Taylor Vince), but he escapes by killing his processing officer. Upon questioning Gerry, Mulder and Scully were able to determine that he is a deeply damaged soul suffering from family trauma due to a now-dead father and a sister who committed suicide years ago. Having determined Scully needs “saving,” Gerry kidnaps her but is saved by Mulder after Scully stalls her pending lobotomy by digging into Gerry’s scarred past. In the end, Gerry takes a picture of himself and is able to see his own death at the hands of Mulder. Scully wraps up the case file but cannot explain the phenomena of the psychic photographs.

As a piece of standard serial killer lore, “Unruhe” is fairly typical stuff: the damaged killer with daddy issues saving women as he couldn’t save his own sister. The addition of the supernatural element that even the killer himself doesn’t understand is the X-Files twist that Gilligan added to great visual effect. The photographs are creepy and effective. That actually extends to multiple visuals throughout the episode, including Gerry’s creepy stilts, the house coat he drapes over his victims, the yellow slicker he wears in the beginning, the image of Gerry approaching his first victim through her umbrella. All the stuff of nightmares they are. But the best aspect of the episode is the focus Gilligan gives to Scully and the brutal efficiency that Gillian Anderson uses to draw out subtleties in the character. Scully is deeply shaken by the shocking violence against women, made worse by her eventual kidnapping and near lobotomy.

The best episodes of The X-Files deftly blend intense psychological scares with just a dash of the supernatural. “Unruhe” does just that thanks to Vince Gilligan’s strong writing. The episode isn’t one that will be remembered for years to come, but it’s effective enough to rank highly in my book.

Water Cooler Podcast: Episode 42 – Emmy Reactions

The Awards Daily TV Water Cooler gang gathers around the cooler at the end of last night’s Emmy ceremony to recap and review the winners (Viola Davis, Regina King, Jon Hamm) and losers (Andy Samberg). We discuss favorite moments, jokes that worked, and jokes that didn’t. Join us as we close the doors on Emmys 2015.

EmmyWatch: ‘Thrones’ Takes the Emmy Crown

The 67th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards were handed out tonight and proved HBO total dominance of the current television landscape, wining TV Movie for Bessie, Limited Series for Olive Kitteridge, Comedy Series for Veep, and Drama Series for Game of Thrones. Otherwise, it was a history-making evening when Viola Davis became the first African-American actress to win an Emmy for Drama Actress for her role in How to Get Away with Murder. Her eloquent speech included the much-Tweeted line, “You cannot win an Emmy for roles that are simply not there.” Jon Hamm also finally won an Emmy, breaking the winless acting streak for Mad Men performers in its final season.

On the Drama Series side, Game of Thrones bested The West Wing’s previous Emmy record for most wins in a single season – 12 wins including Drama Series and a surprise, very left-field second win for Peter Dinklage. HBO’s Veep also won big tonight, taking home trophies for Comedy Series, Comedy Actress, and Comedy Supporting Actor. This ended Modern Family‘s streak of consecutive Comedy Series wins.

Here are the winners in the televised categories (previous winners were announced in the Creative Arts ceremony last weekend):

Continue reading “EmmyWatch: ‘Thrones’ Takes the Emmy Crown”

X-Files Flashback: ‘Teliko’

Season 4, Episode 3
Director: James Charleston
Writer: Howard Gordon

Let’s start with something nice. It’s great that The X-Files dedicated an episode to exploring characters, thereby employing actors, of a different ethnic background than what is typically presented on the show. “Teliko” has an undercurrent theme of African men seeking refuge and citizenship within the U.S. Granted, one man in particular appears supernatural in nature, but this is The X-Files and when in Rome… However, by going down this undoubtedly well-intended path, the show exposes some incredibly ill-defined and cringe-inducing racial politics that it is ill-equipped to address.

The prologue presents an inbound international flight into the U.S. where an African man goes to the bathroom just before landing. In the tight space, he is attacked by another man with red eyes and stark white albino skin. The first man’s dead body is discovered by the flight attendant just before landing. Several months later, Skinner brings in Scully on a serial missing persons case in Philadelphia where four African American men have gone missing. One body turns up and is found to be in a similar albino state, leading many to suspect a disease. As the episode progresses, Mulder and Scully try to track down the killer, an immigrant who attacks African American men and steals their pituitary gland using a hook inserted through the nose and hidden in a wooden tube stored in his throat. It’s a ghastly image watching him pull the thing out of his throat. Eventually, Mulder and Scully track the killer down to a local construction site where he hides out and stores his victims. He nearly kills Mulder, but Scully is able to overpower him. The man is hospitalized but may not live to stand trial.

“Teliko” isn’t a great episode. Even without the uncomfortable politics, it’s just a poorly written, poorly defined episode that warranted more time to identify with the African American characters. The title stems from an African urban legend about “spirits of the air,” causing Mulder to believe that the killer is one of these spirits. The origin of the killer is never fully explained, and he bears a too-close resemblance to “Squeeze’s” Eugene Tooms, right down to the ability to squeeze into inhumanly tight spaces. Also, Mulder and Scully have a weirdly antagonistic relationship in this episode, which completely comes out of left field and lacks the necessary precursor that would explain why this tight pair feels so at-odds for much of the episode. Aside from those minor complaints, the episode is mostly problematic because it begins to equate African immigrants with “aliens.” They are the “others,” those who hide and cause damage within the dominant U.S. culture. They are presented as having their own foreign ways and ideals that are to be feared and hunted down as much as any of the extraterrestrials that propagate the series from time to time. Additionally, it uses the idea of skin tone and albinism as a way of classifying and identifying dangerous men – something the writers clearly (hopefully) did not intend yet stepped into by design of the plot.

Despite a thrilling, genuinely tense climax, “Teliko” goes down as, at best, a mediocre episode of The X-Files. If you look closer, then it becomes something of a culturally dangerous outing, one that needs to be fully explored and discussed rather than brushed under the carpet. The writers try to voice some concern through the persona of Mulder, but that doesn’t really sell their case as Mulder is consistently seen as the paranoid lunatic in the world of The X-Files. That doesn’t really help their case in the long run. Nor does it guide the episode in any meaningful direction. The writers clearly wanted something unique to present after years of variations on the same theme, but, in attempting this, they have stepped into dangerous cultural implications the show cannot satisfactorily address.

Of Gods and Monsters

Steve Jobs: The Man in the Machine
Available on Amazon Instant Video, On Demand, and iTunes

American Experience: Walt Disney
Available on iTunes, DVD, and PBS.com

I grew up on a farm in the middle of nowhere in eastern North Carolina. With the closest friend some 15 miles away, television quickly became my lifelong companion. Sure, there were hours spent running through fields of corn and wheat with my dog at my side, but one can only really take about two hours of that. But television provided hours and hours of pure pleasure, particularly when my parents bought a satellite dish – one of those big SETI-like things – which opened my worldview significantly. I obsessed over thousands of films and shows available to me, not the least of which was the early days of The Disney Channel. I’m talking about the days it used to show non-stop hours of classic Disney cartoons over today’s pre-teen focused entertainment/garbage.

Aside from television, I was also obsessed with blossoming technology. Being five, I was quickly the first one in the house to master said satellite dish and, more importantly, my Atari 2600. That led to my Nintendo which led to my Game Boy which led to my first PC which led to my iPod and iPhone and iPad and Macbook etc, etc, etc.

You see where I’m going with this by now, I hope.

Given my relatively isolated upbringing, Walt Disney and, later, Steve Jobs were two men I would never meet, yet they had a profound impact on my life and the lives of billions of others worldwide. It is most likely entirely coincidental that documentaries about these two visionaries and undeniable geniuses were released in the same month. The parallels between the two men are slim at best, yet they still both shared a significant mix of traits: inherent within their significant contributions to American and, eventually, the worldwide culture were wide streaks of aggressively unpleasant – near monstrous – traits. To their credit, neither documentary hides from the unfortunate truths of both men, but neither really paints a completely vivid portrait of their subject. It is difficult to condense a full life – all of its joys, its shortcomings, and its stark and unflattering truths – into a 2 or 4-hour film, and, like many fictional biopics are accused of doing, both documentaries ultimately feel like a series of “greatest hits” from which we learn very little.

Alex Gibney’s Steve Jobs: The Man in the Machine begins with the death of Apple’s co-founder and ultimate CEO in 2011. Gibney includes a montage of people reacting to the death, and his narration takes on an almost alien feeling as he clearly feels disconnected from the actions of those he films. He asks, “Why are so many people crying over a man they never even knew?” Thus, the central question of the documentary becomes, given Jobs’s equally pervasive reputation as a creative genius and complete asshole, why do people weep openly for who Gibney and others consider an at best cruel and at worst dangerous man.

Gibney spends an hour and a half on the growth of Jobs from his much-publicized and discussed adoption and upbringing by doting parents to his near half-year pilgrimage to India to his ultimate development of the machine that would become the first Apple computer. This part of the story is the part we’re most familiar with given the hundreds of times the story has been recanted in various profiles and films. There is as much time dedicated to his professional triumphs as to his personal disasters, including his poor treatment of friend and partner Steve Wozniak and the outright rejection of his biological daughter, Lisa. Yet, one thing remains abundantly clear about this version of Steve Jobs: he was at this stage in his life an immature and spoiled brat. He was a boy in a man’s body – at once eager for the success and limelight that great men earn but unable to adapt to the requirements of being a man.

After phasing through Jobs’s tenure at the struggling Next, Gibney shifts his focus to Jobs’s great second act as the CEO of Apple, and it’s this section of the documentary that I personally find the most problematic. To be fair, there is an intense amount of detail to cover in the last 10 years of Jobs’s life that no half hour of a 2-hour documentary could possibly cover it all. Yet, Gibney spent the earlier portion of the film providing a fair and balanced account of the man Steve Jobs before rushing to the end by highlighting only the most outwardly negative aspects of the late Jobs. Here, instead of focusing on Jobs’s nurturing of Pixar, the iMac, the iPod, or the iPhone, Gibney continues down the well-trodden path of “Steve was a hard man to work for.” We’re also treated to an exploration of Jobs’s involvement in back-dating of stock options and of his involvement in the Foxconn tragedies. It’s not that I minded including these facts in the documentary – hell, I lived through them, so it was nothing new to me. It’s that Gibney so obviously omitted much of what made late phase Steve Jobs even greater than the early phase. He does develop one fascinating theory about Jobs’s desire to make personal computing more personal and, by doing so, pushes people farther away from each other. That is something I wanted more of, but in the end, Gibney is never able to answer his own question as to why so many people wept when Steve Jobs died. I have my own opinions on the matter, but they were always my own and not anything I developed based on Gibney’s presentation. To answer that question, you need more information, more information than Gibney provides, and I highly recommend you read Becoming Steve Jobs by Brent Schlender and Rick Tetzeli. It is what I consider to be the definitive work on the man and the monster.

The American Experience: Walt Disney documentary is roughly twice the size of Gibney’s Jobs doc, but I found it no more successful. Being a self-proclaimed Disney nerd, this one was the more bitter pill to swallow. This is the documentary that told me more about Disney’s dark side than I think I was ready to accept. But more on that later…

Disney is a more traditional documentary than Gibney’s work. It starts in the early days of Disney’s life and moves along beat by beat through his years as a struggling animator, through his struggles relating to his father, through his early successes with Oswald the Rabbit, and ultimately through his revelation in Mickey Mouse. The first two hours are largely dedicated to Disney’s creation of what is considered to be the Big Five in early motion picture animation – Snow White and the Seven DwarfsBambiDumboFantasia, and Pinocchio. This section is an animation fans wet dream, and, although I knew much of the detail here, it is still well presented in an accessible and beautiful presentation. What I didn’t know as much about was Disney’s penchant for nastiness, bordering on hatefulness. He built an animation empire but built it in a sort of a sexist caste system where men held the power positions, privileges and income while women were largely relegated to the painful cell painting process where they literally went blind for roughly 10 percent of what men were making.

When the animators complained, an incensed Disney held a company meeting where he effectively justified his system, claiming those who worked hard reaped the rewards. If you didn’t make enough money, then you weren’t good enough to justify the salary. Excerpts from his speech are included in the film, and it’s as hateful and ugly as anything in the Jobs piece. And it gets worse from there. After the animators began to strike in support of an animator’s union, he lashes out against them – eventually engaging in fisticuffs with the animator who brought Goofy to life. Walt’s brother, Roy, eventually brought the strike to an end, but Walt felt betrayed and disillusioned by this new system of fairness. He then testified in front of the HUAC (House Un-American Activities Committee) about those who helped bring about the strike and claimed them to be communists. He later repeated the same communist theory when the NAACP and prominent African Americans picketed the Atlanta premiere of his controversial Song of the South. When we finally reach the creation of Disneyland, a little joy comes back into the Disney image, but you’re never unaware of the misery inside the man that brought joy to so many. According to American Experience‘s portrait, Walt Disney, the human being, bore little resemblance to Walt Disney, the public persona.

Like Jobs, Disney had significant father issues, something he tried to work out through Mary Poppins and something covered significantly in the film Saving Mr. Banks. But unlike Jobs, Disney tried to hide his darker side from the world by frequently going on self-imposed exiles when reality became too difficult. This naturally contrasts with Steve Jobs who seemed to wear his negative qualities on his left sleeve with his undisputed genius on his right sleeve. Both documentaries spent a lot of time combing through the dichotomy of two geniuses who weren’t necessarily great people, but does being a monster preclude you from being a genius? I don’t personally think so, I work with very difficult and very smart people all the time. In the end, neither documentary offers a robust enough perspective on either subject to give the casual viewer the whole truth. They both raise the concern of their monstrous temperaments but never try to wrestle with the implications of doing so. American Experience‘s biggest crime is that it ultimately becomes a rather one-note and rushed take on Walt Disney that single-handedly focuses on the personal failures of the man. Alex Gibney’s take on Steve Jobs commits a much bigger sin by failing to answer its own questions.

Neither man is beyond reproach, of course, so that isn’t my objection here. Yet, if you’re going to explore the personas of two men who have arguably changed the way we interact with entertainment and pop culture today, then you’d damn well better do it in a fair and balanced way. Neither documentary does that, in my opinion.

The legacies of Walt Disney and Steve Jobs deserve better.

 

 

X-Files Flashback: ‘Home’

Season 4, Episode 2
Director: Kim Manners
Writer: Glen Morgan, James Wong

The X-Files‘ “Home” is some of the most subversive, brilliant, disturbing, terrifying and disgusting television that has ever aired. I’m not normally given to extreme fits of hyperbole, but, in this case, it most assuredly applies. The only episode of the series I’d previously seen aside from the 1998 film, “Home” is unforgettable, and it feels like an episode of a completely different television series. Thanks to its vivid imagery and real scares, it has stayed fresh in the dark corners of my mind since the last time I’d seen it on its original air date: October 11, 1996. It’s that effective.

It begins in near-dark with a screaming woman and three impossibly hulking men delivering a child in a lightening storm. After the birth of the baby, the men stomp out into the night and promptly bury it in a nearby field. The next day, kids play a pickup game of baseball in the same abandoned field (next to the family’s – the Peacock’s – creepy and run-down farmhouse). Stubbing his toe in the dirt, the batter discovers a pool of blood and a tiny hand protruding from the ground. Mulder and Scully are called to the scene in Home, Pennsylvania, to investigate. After questioning their purpose, they work with local sheriff Andy Taylor (a fully intended Mayberry pun) and review the uncovered corpse, a horribly disfigured infant who appears to display every genetic disease known to man. Certain that the inbreeding Peacock’s have kidnapped a woman – only men are known to live at the house – Mulder and Scully break into the Peacock’s home and take a few items from the kitchen birth scene as evidence.

Later that night, the Peacock men pay a visit to Sheriff Taylor’s home and beat him and his wife to death. Not just to death. They beat them into a near-unrecognizable bloody pulp. Now having evidence linking the Peacock’s to the buried infant, Mulder and Scully are joined by Deputy Barney Paster and converge on the Peacock home. Deputy Barney is quickly decapitated by a booby trap, so Mulder and Scully attempt to distract the Peacock’s by releasing their pigs. After gaining entry into the house, they discover the Peacock’s mother, missing all limbs and strapped to a board with caster wheels. When the boys were feeling “amorous,” they apparently rolled her out and did their business. The mother refuses Scully’s attempts at help, stating she would do anything for her boys. The “boys” quickly return to the scene, and a gruesome fight breaks out in which two Peacock boys are killed. The third escapes with the mother, and they are seen driving off into the distance.

“Home” has much more value to it than mere shock value. The crew seems to have elevated its game to a cinematic level with brilliant effects, cinematography, and direction. The choice to use Johnny Mathis’s “Wonderful, Wonderful” during the Andy Taylor murder sequence was especially inspired. The episode moves like lightning and is completely absorbing, no matter how disgusting the content may be. Yet, surprisingly, “Home” is also one of the most thematically resonant episodes of the series to date. It deals with motherhood and family from Scully’s desire to have children to the corrupt Peacock family structure. It deals with the dissolution of small town America through the frequent allusions to Mayberry and Sheriff Andy Taylor. Additionally, it deals with Americana as much as anything in Tobe Hooper’s Texas Chainsaw Massacre series, a film in which it is clearly in great debt.

As a piece of entertainment, “Home” is the most brutal and shocking episode of the series, I suspect. Ironically, it received a good-to-mixed critical reaction because it pushed the horror envelope too far for an episode of primetime television. That is understandable as I doubt anything like this would be made today with the exception of the equally shocking and perverse Hannibal. After revisiting the episode, I do not believe it has lost even an ounce of its power since originally airing. As many episodes tend to feel dated, “Home” has a timeless appear, largely thanks to the connection to Mayberry and Texas Chainsaw. As a piece of television horror, you will unlikely see a more accomplished hour.

You can’t keep a Peacock down.

Podcast Preview: It’s All About the Emmys

Posting Monday morning, the latest episode of Awards Daily TV’s Water Cooler podcast is a bit of an experiment. We will cover our reactions to the Emmy ceremony including host Andy Samberg, winners, losers, and any crazy production numbers. The big change this week is that we’re going to record toward the end of the Emmy ceremony, around 10pm ET right up until the bitter end.

If you have opinions / thoughts on the Emmys that you’d like to share with us “live” on air, then simply tweet us at @AwardsDailyTV. We’ll read your tweet on the podcast! Also, follow the ADTV crew during the ceremony for the latest snark. That’s @chmoye, @heydudemeg, and @joeymoser83 and others!

Join us for the Television Academy’s big night as we put the 2015 Emmy season to bed!

EmmyWatch: ADTV Team Predictions!

Here are the full set of predictions from Awards Daily TV’s full set of regular contributors. Based on our predictions, HBO’s Game of Thrones will go home the new record holder for most Emmy wins by a series in a single season.

The winners will be formally announced Sunday night on FOX with host Andy Samberg.

Comedy

Comedy

Drama

Drama

Limited / Variety Series

Limited : Variety