EmmyWatch: Surveying the Supporting Actress Drama Field

Note: This is the first in an on-going series of posts exploring the major categories at the 2015 Emmy awards. We will cover actors, actresses, and series – Comedy and Drama – through the end of the voting period on August 28. See something you like or a performance you’d like to single out? Share the posts and create some Twitter buzz! We’ll see you at the Emmys.

The six actresses who have been honored in the Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series lineup have now moved onto the next stage of the Emmy process. Each nominee has submitted an episode that best encapsulates their work from the 2014-15 television season for voters to judge and choose the winner of the category. Although the strict rules from the past have been loosened by the new streaming service (voters will now watch the episodes online), theoretically the quality and impact of the selected episodes are supposed to dictate how members vote.

crazyeyes

Performer: Uzo Aduba as Suzanne “Crazy Eyes” Warren in Orange is the New Black

Episode: “Hugs Can Be Deceiving” (Season Two, Episode Three)

Highlights: Suzanne’s backstory is fleshed out through flashbacks involving highly emotional situations.

Why she could win: In addition to claiming the Screen Actor’s Guild for Female Performer in a Comedy Series (in any category: lead, supporting, guest), Aduba won the Comedy Guest Actress Emmy for season one last year, so we know industry voters have been positively responding to her work on Orange is the New Black. Under the more relaxed voting process, having a trending name of a previous award winner like “Uzo Aduba” means something. The episode she submitted allows her to dig into some grating, exuberant emotions, such as slapping herself in the face, bearing the brunt of public humiliation, and being ostracized by the other prisoners on the show. A child actor fills in Suzanne’s younger years, which should lock the viewer into empathizing with the character to an even greater degree when Aduba plays more of the defining moments in the character’s later years. Of all the nominated performances in the category, Aduba has the loudest acting of the bunch, which more easily paves the road to impressing voters.

Why she could lose: Her acting and storyline are appropriate enough to catch the eyes of Emmy judges, but Orange is the New Black is still at its core an ensemble show, and even though Crazy Eyes gets more focus in this single hour than usual, there are still other moving components other than her backstory. The buzz for her show has also simmered this year, as it was snubbed in both the writing and directing categories after a strong acknowledgement for season one. This is most likely the result of the show’s category switch from comedy to drama. Contending as a dramatic series entails fiercer competition than what Orange is the New Black rivaled in a lighter field last year; Aduba’s greatest challenge is overcoming her co-nominees’ more somber performances. Though her acting is grounded in dramatics, Aduba has flares of comedy running through her work.

good-wife459

Performer: Christine Baranski as Diane Lockhart in The Good Wife

Episode: “Loser Edit” (Season Six, Episode Eighteen)

Highlights: Diane argues for gay marriage in a think tank exercise and a mock trial, allowing her to give many speeches and display grandstanding moments of heroism.

Why she could win: For the show’s six-year run, there has not been an Emmy voting cycle where Baranski was in contention for her work on The Good Wife, and with each passing season her material becomes more aggressive. “Loser Edit” is the best of the six episodes she has ever submitted for playing Diane Lockhart. Baranski is practically the lead of “Loser Edit,” with even Alicia’s storyline appearing secondary to Diane’s plot. Whenever Diane is on screen, Baranski incessantly engaged and drives the conversation surrounding the political issue. She makes us feel the passion in Diane’s defense of gay marriage, a topical plot since the Supreme Court legalized gay marriage nationwide, to the room full of conservatives. She delivers a few beautifully flowing speeches about the law and how personal and fair it has to be. Baranski, who last won an Emmy over 20 years ago and would benefit from a more popular-vote swaying Academy, could be the spoiler of this category with her moving performance composed of subtlety. Also working in her favor: an actress from The Good Wife has won every year since the show began, and Baranski is the only hope this year to keep the (probably inadvertent) tradition alive.

Why she could lose: Diane is not the type of character that lends itself to hysterical moments of crying and yelling, the type character behavior Emmy trophies gravitate towards. Baranski doesn’t invade the viewer’s personal space with her acting like some of the other nominees do, so voters could feel less emotionally compelled to vote her. Also working against Baranski is the fact that being overdue at the Emmys does not hold as much weight as being overdue at the Oscars. Many people theorize her annual Emmy adulation is a result of respect for a veteran actress, not necessarily because she’s undeniably fantastic in the role.

drogon-daenerys-season-5

Performer: Emilia Clarke as Daenerys Targaryen in Game of Thrones

Episode: “The Dance of Dragons” (Season Five, Episode Nine)

Highlights: Daenerys dominates the last third of “The Dance with Dragons,” including an epic action sequence, which includes intimate moments she shares with her wounded dragon, Drogon, in a fighting arena.

Why she could win: Game of Thrones actors often cannot make it to the finish line at the Emmys because of a lacking screentime in their submissions. In Clarke’s favor is an extensive presence in a segment the end of the episode, and voters will also see her performance in her co-star Lena Headey’s submitted episode, “Mother’s Mercy.” The Game of Thrones craze currently floating in the air benefits her as well; the show received 24 nominations from the Television Academy this year.

Why she could lose: Unfortunately for Clarke, most of her work in this episode is purely physical and spectacle, nothing grounded in heavy emotion and melodrama. She barely has any lines of dialogue for being on screen for 15 minutes, which is a huge problem for an actor trying to win an Emmy. Even though she was nominated before, Clarke was severely underestimated by most pundits for a nomination this year and was most likely swept into the category as a result of the enormous consensus support for the series this past season.

AnnaDAS5

Performer: Joanne Froggatt as Anna Bates in Downton Abbey

Episode: “Episode Eight” (Season Five, Episode Eight)

Highlights: This episode shows Anna first being placed in a police lineup, identified, and subsequently arrested for murder.

Why she could win: The arc of Froggatt’s episode—Anna being hauled away in handcuffs—is inherently sympathetic, which is something voters are drawn to when making their picks in the acting categories. With Maggie Smith’s shocking omission from the category, Froggatt is left as the sole actor representing the Emmy favorite, Downton Abbey. The huge fanbase for her show within the Academy could rally behind Froggatt. After all, she was overlooked last year with her devastating rape storyline in order to reward Anna Gunn’s seismic submission for the final season of Breaking Bad.

Why she could lose: Froggatt is a returning nominee, but her submission this year pales in comparison to the terrific highs she achieved last year. Though she’s physically present throughout the 67-minute show, her presence is barely felt because of her mostly brief scenes—only three of Froggatt’s scenes that last longer than a minute and half. The material she’s given does not allow her to be as effective as other women nominated in this category.

Joan

Performer: Christina Hendricks as Joan Harris in Mad Men

Episode: “Lost Horizon” (Season Seven, Episode Twelve)

Highlights: In the series pinnacle moment for her, Joan takes a stand against sexism in the 1970’s workplace and eventually leaves her position at the advertising agency of which she was once a partner.

Why she could win: Hendricks was widely seen as the MVP of Mad Men’s final string of episodes, mostly due to Joan’s feminist nerve as she enters the world of a bigger corporation. Voters will root for Joan the more than any other character in this year’s Drama Supporting Actress category as they see the unfair treatment she endures as a woman in the workforce in the early ‘70s. Hendricks gets to play some memorable scenes in “Lost Horizon,” specifically ones that shine a light on the boldness Joan has when firing back at the men trying to dismiss her occupational complaints. This episode marks more of a tragic ending for Joan, who surrenders to the payoff and leaves the advertising agency quietly. This Hendricks’s sixth Emmy nomination for the role without ever winning. Unlike the Oscars, having an “overdue factor” doesn’t influence voters as much (and if any supporting actress benefits from being “overdue” this year, it’s most likely Baranski, who has been nominated nine times since she won her last Emmy), but the growing nostalgia for Mad Men could make Hendricks a more appealing contender this year.

Why she could lose: Dozens of Mad Men actors have helped fill the Emmy ballots over the eight years, but never has an actor won, which is most likely due to the voting system not being compatible with the type of nuanced acting style Mad Men required. Emmy voters love to reward emotional fireworks like crying and powerful speeches, and though “Lost Horizon” is one of her better episodes in a “fireworks” sense, it still has the problems that all of Hendricks’s other submissions had in being too timid and not as vigorously expressive as her competition.

Cersei

Performer: Lena Headey as Cersei Lannister in Game of Thrones

Episode: “Mother’s Mercy” (Season Five, Episode Ten)

Highlights: After being held in prison for a period of time, Cersei confesses her sins to the High Sparrow and accepts the following punishment in order to be released: walking completely naked through an angry mob of townspeople, who verbally and physically shame her.

Why she could win: Game of Thrones topped the list for receiving the most nominations of any show this year, so not only is the Academy is approving of the fifth season, but there is the rare precedent for actors winning from the fantasy genre: Peter Dinklage won the Supporting Actor Emmy in 2011 for Game of Thrones. More importantly, Headey’s submission is easily the most immediately impactful of the category. She’s likely to startle voters with her vulnerability in her confession scene, her helplessness when having her head forcibly shaved, and her disturbing agony in the Walk of Shame sequence. It’s the caliber of an acting showcase that undeniably shakes the viewer into horror. The goal of an actor submitting tapes is to leave an unforgettable mark on the voters mind in their episode, and it’s doubtful that anyone will forget Headey’s 10 minutes of walking nude through a crowd of extras, who are degrade her by yelling, “Whore!” and “Shame!”

Why she could lose: While it seems as if she could be a lock for the win, Headey has a major obstacle between her and the trophy: a body double was used for the majority of the Walk of Shame scene, confirmed by Headey herself. (The belief is Headey opted to use the body double after receiving news of her pregnancy.) The Academy could agree with some viewers who have commented about the awkward CGI used to put Headey’s face on the body double in the finished scene. In fact, most of the scene is framed in longer shots; there are very few instances in the where Headey’s acting is the pure driving force of the scene’s impact. The directing and action around the character are arguably the reasons why the scene is so traumatic. In addition, Headey has no screentime in the first 40 minutes of “Mother’s Mercy,” and is not offered the opportunity to portray any other emotions apart from suffering.

X-Files Flashback: ‘Sleepless’

Season 2, Episode 4
Director: Rob Bowman
Writer: Howard Gordon

…we’re not in Seattle anymore.

The “Sleepless” episode of The X-Files typifies what we can expect of Season Two. Mulder is pulled into a case with tinges of the paranormal, Scully performs the autopsy and has a few deeper emotional moments with him over the phone (again, hiding her pregnancy), and the government continues to intervene both positively and negatively into Mulder and Scully’s search for the truth. So, in that regard, “Sleepless” offers nothing new exactly save a fantastically creepy performance from Tony Todd of Candyman fame.

Now, to understand my appreciation for the episode, you have to understand that I consider Candyman one of the more terrifying films of the 90s mostly due to Todd’s accomplished central performance. It gave me great joy to see Todd pop up here in The X-Files, a vehicle perfectly suited to his sensibilities. Unfortunately, his character does not last longer than this single episode. I wish that Chris Carter had somehow found a way to extend his presence on the show. He’s that good at chilling you with a single glance.

The prologue shows an elderly man waking in his luxury New York apartment to the sound of a raging inferno outside. He calls 9-1-1 and pulls a fire extinguisher out of the closet, but it has little effect on the roaring flames. When firefighters reach the floor, there are no flames, and, after breaking into his apartment, they discover his dead body. A later autopsy reveals symptoms of internal organs that actually burned to death, yet there was neither evidence of fire damage within the apartment nor burns on the body. Mulder’s investigation reveals that the victim worked with the government on top-secret sleep-related project for Vietnam soldiers. The theory was that a soldier’s worst enemy was sleep, so they effectively negated the body’s need for sleep by removing a portion of the brain and supplementing other functions with medication.

Turns out, that didn’t really work for the soldiers as, according to details provided by Augustus “Preacher” Cole (Todd) and other remaining soldiers, they began to go a little crazy in the jungle, eventually attacking innocent children. Preacher is now on a mission to kill all who were involved with the mission, including a fellow soldier, using his telepathic ability to project deadly events on his victims. Saddled with a new partner (Alex Krycek, played by Nicholas Lea), Mulder eventually tracks Preacher down in an desolate area of the subway where he pleads for death – the eternal sleep. Mulder’s partner Krycek is fooled into believing Preacher has a gun and shoots him dead. Later, Krycek is seen to have been working with the Smoking Man and others in an attempt to further derail not only Mulder’s investigations but also his relationship with Scully. Absence has made the heart grow fonder, and this causes the government significant distress.

There really isn’t much to say about “Sleepless.” It’s a decent episode that was, as I’ve mentioned, significantly elevated by Tony Todd’s central performance. Nicholas Lea is also good in the role of Mulder’s new partner who evolves from wide-eyed Mulder fanboy into a covert agent working for the opposition. It will be fun watching their dynamic continue as the series progresses. I also liked some of the camerawork and atmospheric detail of the episode. Shadows and light are especially well used here, particularly in the scenes that evoke Preacher’s psychic torture of his victims (something I’m not 100% sure I exactly understood how he accomplished). As with any medium, sometimes the right actors can elevate any material beyond its pulpy origins. This is certainly true of “Sleepless.”

The Best Show to Pair ‘UnREAL’ with Isn’t ‘The Bachelorette’

UnREAL is the sudsy guilty-pleasure of the summer.

It follows the cast and crew behind the scenes of a reality dating show called Everlasting, so it’s supposed to be the reality behind the “reality,” when really it’s pure fiction. Yet, it plays out more realistically than anything you’ll see on Bravo this season.  While UnREAL premiered to low ratings, it’s maintained buzz over the summer, especially with ABC airing its latest season of The Bachelorette on the same night. Bachelorette fans will switch over to the Lifetime show directly following the dating drama.

But while some fans like to consume The Bachelorette and UnREAL together like cheese and wine, I prefer to drink the latter with another show: LOST.

Granted, I will never watch LOST again after its lackluster finale (and final two seasons), but when I watch UnREAL, I think fondly of the early mystique of the island and wondering why these characters are here.

It’s kind of a stretch, but if you think about it, the two shows share strange resemblances to each other. Each show consists of people who’ve done bad things to get where they are. They’re both stuck in a confined location that they all want to get out of. And strange things happen like frolicking polar bears and white ladies dangling from the roof.

I like to watch UnREAL with the idea that everyone is in purgatory and that they are all trying to find their way out, which is essentially the plot of LOST (although they were in emotional purgatory for seasons 1 through 5 and literal purgatory in season 6).

From the very beginning, there’s something eerie and disturbing about UnREAL. We meet Constance Zimmer’s Quinn, who may as well be Christof from The Truman Show, calling the shots and anticipating America’s every racist move (you can’t have a black girl come out of the limo first!). She goes through the motions like she’s done this a million times. She’s like Desmond hitting the button every 108 minutes.

Then, there’s the producer Rachel (Shiri Appleby). She made a drunken scene at the end of last season, alienating everyone (including her boyfriend) and putting her on probation. But she’s back. . .because. .there’s no place else for her to go. She’s Jack Shephard. She desperately wants to go back to the island she couldn’t wait to get away from. And like Jack, she makes questionable decisions, like inviting one of the contestant’s abusive husbands for a confrontation on the show.

No one on UnREAL is likable. Everyone has their sins, and they run deep. The Bachelor himself Adam Cromwell (Freddie Stroma) whores himself out in an effort to get investors for his vineyard. Shia (Aline Elasmar) messes with one of the contestant’s bipolar medication to get bitch-tastic moments for the camera. Even the measly production assistant intern Madison (Genevieve Buechner) gives her married boss Chet (Craig Bierko) a BJ just because she feels like she has to.

Yet, unlike LOST, we don’t get flashbacks of these characters. We don’t learn the drive behind their actions. In fact, we don’t even see what these characters’ home lives are like, which actually makes for more effectively grim storytelling. These people are just… here. They don’t have a life outside of the show, so it makes it seem like they are all minions to the cause with Quinn leading with a pitchfork.

I doubt that UnREAL will end with everyone meeting at a church and going to Heaven together, and I prefer it that way. UnREAL is darker and more twisted. And if Quinn has her way, no one will ever escape.

Water Cooler Podcast: Episode 35 – Wet Hot American Cait

This week on Awards Daily TV’s Water Cooler podcast, Megan, Clarence, and Joey gather around the Cooler to discuss the premiere of Caitlyn Jenner’s reality series I Am Cait which does manage to rise above its E!-level trappings to offer something meaningful about the transgender community. Even Megan and Clarence are able to overlook their Kardashian bias to appreciate aspects of the show. Next, we discuss Netflix’s Wet Hot American Summer: First Day of Camp, the prequel series to the cult-classic 2001 film. Even though this was one of our most anticipated series of the summer, the reactions from the Water Cooler gang run the gamut.

Just as a reminder, in a few weeks, we will be kicking off another Water Cooler flashback with Arrested Development Season Four. Make sure you’ve caught up to it on Netflix so you too can follow along at home.

2:07 – I Am Cait
20:14 – Wet Hot American Summer: First Day of Camp

X-Files Flashback: ‘Blood’

Season 2, Episode 3
Director: David Nutter
Writer: Glen Morgan, James Wong

“Blood,” the third episode of The X-Files‘s second season, clearly identifies how significant an influence the writings of Stephen King had on the series. I’m not specifically referring to particular monsters or random madmen. No, to know King’s early writings is to understand the source of his horror: the corruption of the ordinary. His horror stems from ordinary people or items – a meek high school girl, a hapless father, a clown – that are twisted into objects of terror. Horror, typically, doesn’t stem from the extraordinary. It comes in the guise of the banal, and few episodes of The X-Files understands that as well as “Blood.”

We begin with a mild-mannered postal employee Ed Funsch (character actor William Sanderson, Newhart, doing some really tremendous work) receiving the bad news that, due to the usual layoffs and cutbacks, he’s going to lose his job. After returning to his station, the machinery in front of him begins to spout out ominous instructions: “Kill. Kill. Kill ‘Em All.” And he’s not the only one. Several people experience similar messages conveyed through electronics during situations in which they are faced with their greatest fear – claustrophobia, rape, and blood. Many of these individuals kill unwitting bystanders, and local law enforcement requests the assistance of Mulder in investigating the crimes. With the aid of the ever-autopsying Scully, Mulder determines that an advanced chemical sprayed at night to control the insect population around the town’s orchards. This chemical contains components which could cause hallucinations and heighten fear, if properly triggered. Finally, after multiple influence attempts, Ed finally cracks and takes to a nearby bell tower on a college campus. He opens fire on the crowd but is eventually overcome by Mulder. At the end of the episode, Mulder, who was accidentally doused with the chemical, receives a message on his cell phone saying, “All done. Bye bye!” Thus, we never discover the source of the trigger messages.

I reference Stephen King as a base for exploring the episode given the multiple instances of deadly violence erupting from everyday people. The theme runs through some of his greatest work such as The Shining and, most directly correlated to “Blood,” Needful Things. The horror here stems from the unexpected outbursts that lead to murder. When are they coming? Who will attack? Why are they killing? What is causing this? No answers are given, which contributes to the overall sense of dread baked into the episode. Another interesting aspect of the episode to consider is the location of the opening and closing scenes which are direct references to true-life crimes. Poor Ed is initially seen in a Post Office sorting facility, and the phrase “going postal” didn’t come to fruition in the early 90s all on its own. Then, Ed finally snaps and begins shooting from a bell tower that very strongly resembles Charles Whitman’s bloody rampage at the University of Texas in 1966. These are both true-life examples of the mundane evolving into acts of horror something that “Blood” shows us again and again.

You do wonder, if this episode were made today, would there be a scene invoking a murder within a school yard or a movie theater. None of the crimes in “Blood” happen in extraordinary ways – somewhat of a departure from the crimes most commonly associated with The X-Files – but that’s the point of it all. “Blood” hypothesizes that anyone can kill given a warped sense of motivation. He’s going to rape you. They’re coming to get you. There’s not enough air. The true horror which still stands today is not knowing the real reason why these things happen.

Review: Netflix’s ‘Wet Hot American Summer: First Day of Camp’

I often think of Hollywood as like cliques in high school.

There’s the A-list/popular group (think: Brad Pitt, Angelina Jolie), the B-list group (Vince Vaughn, Kate Hudson), the stoners (James Franco, Seth Rogen, and the gang), and the class clowns, which includes pretty much everyone in Wet Hot American Summer. And of all these groups, I’d want to hang out with the Wet Hot crowd.

Fifteen years ago in Wet Hot American Summer, director David Wain managed to assemble a ragtag team of up-and-comers who would become some of the most influential actors and actresses working in movies and television today. So while there’s a lot of anticipation with the Netflix series prequel First Day of Camp, there’s also a lot of star power going into it, which enhances the expectations exponentially.

I thoroughly enjoyed all eight episodes of WHAC:FDOC. It was great seeing the gang back together to battle government conspiracy and Camp Tigerclaw. But the series is not as edgy or absurd as what has become a cult classic. For example, instead of letting Lindsay (Elizabeth Banks) simply be a stupid teenage counselor who smells like burgers and just wants to make out, the Netflix series gives her a backstory: She’s a 24-year-old Rock and Roll World reporter who sneaks into camp to cover the “world” aspect of the rag. This storyline feels like it was written only because Wain realized he has Hunger Games’ Elizabeth Banks in his movie now (although the Academy Award nominee Bradley Cooper gets minimal lines and phones in his role).

Many of the characters are still true to the original. Christopher Meloni’s Gene is a stand-out as a crazed Vietnam vet/chef, and we learn a bit more about his origin story. Even David Wain’s Israeli soccer instructor Yaron is a welcome new character, as the foil to Gerald Cooperberg (Michael Showalter). The series also channels a bit of Hamlet 2 by putting on a musical called Electro City, which stars Andy (Paul Rudd) and Katie (Marguerite Moreau) and includes a prison electrocution scene.

As much as it’s a miracle that all of the actors came back to reprise their roles in a film that was deemed a failure, it’s an even bigger miracle how little most of them have aged in 15 years (though Michael Showalter has changed the most, which makes his role as a teenager even more hilarious). Whereas Arrested Development’s Netflix series clearly seemed like a piecemeal creation, with most actors not together for scenes, this series works better in pairing off characters and making it still seem like everyone was at camp.

But what’s lacking most in this series is the goofy crassness of the original. At times, this series is a straightforward summer camp story, especially with the love-lorn Kevin (David Bloom). Granted, there’s a storyline about toxic waste turning someone into a can of vegetables, but this series is missing the little lines and ticks that made the first one so quoteworthy. No one’s humping a fridge or fondling sweaters. And the final episode includes a showdown that the first film would have deemed kind of trite.

Podcast Preview: Wet Hot American Cait

Monday on Awards Daily TV’s Water Cooler podcast, Megan, Clarence, and Joey gather around the cooler to discuss the premiere of Caitlyn Jenner’s reality series I Am Cait. Is this a Kardashian-level reality cash-in or is this something deeper? We also discuss how the series impacts other representations of transgender Americans on television.

Next, we discuss Netflix’s Wet Hot American Summer: First Day of Camp, the prequel series to the cult-classic 2001 film. Does the series do the film justice or does it damage the reputation of the original by adding celebrity cameos to the original’s lower wattage appeal?

Join us for these topics and more on Monday’s podcast!

WHAS

X-Files Flashback: ‘The Host’

Season 2, Episode 2
Director: Daniel Sackheim
Writer: Chris Carter

The trouble with iconic episodes of a show is that, when viewed through the prism of preceding hype, they seldom match their reputation. That phenomena, I must say, is exactly not what I experienced with The X-Files‘s “The Host” episode – the debut of the “Flukeman.” Everything you’ve heard about the episode is 100 percent true. It is thrilling. It is engrossing. And it is super, super, super gross.  As such, this is one of the very best episodes of The X-Files thus far.

The prologue begins on a Russian tanker.  A junior level seaman is forced to deal with an onboard sewage problem. As he reaches into a giant vat of waste, he is pulled in kicking and screaming. Other seamen try to help, but it is too late. The young man is lost, only to wash up in a New Jersey sewer weeks later. In that same sewer, another man is attacked, but this time he is saved yet has a massive wound resembling a strange bite mark on his back. He checks out OK but complains of a strange taste. Later, he vomits a small worm – a fluke – and is found dead in his apartment. Hungry?

The culprit of all this, as Mulder and Scully eventually discover, is the Flukeman, a human-fluke hybrid who implants larvae in its victims as its method of reproducing. They initially trap the Flukeman in a New Jersey sewer, but he escapes, killing another man. The episode concludes with Mulder swimming in an offshoot of the New Jersey sewer system and cutting the Flukeman in half. The closing shot includes a Flukeman floating to the top of the water, eyes open.

The concept of the Flukeman is vividly rendered and one of the more ingenious creations of the series. It is discovered later in the episode that he is a result of fallout from the Chernobyl disaster, and, later in a comic series dedicated to the creature, it is revealed that Flukeman is a human mutated by radiated water and garden variety flukes. Whatever the origins, the creature is terrifying – perhaps not quite the equal of Season One’s Tooms but most assuredly a close second. The episode feeds off of our natural disgust of sewage and the innate fear of what resides within the sewers. It nicely uses this fear to build suspense and deep tension within the audience accentuated by the claustrophobic sets and cinematography. Plus, the creature of the episode is another ingeniously reasoned creation where its survival is the main avenue that causes other humans problems. This isn’t a creature who randomly kills – it attacks for survival, for reproduction. That motivation taps into deep horror genre tropes brilliantly.

Aside from the horror of the antagonist, the episode is also notable for continuing the thread of the disillusioned Mulder with the purpose of the X-files in his life. He grows closer to Scully, and, after he confesses contemplating quitting the FBI, she expresses (in her Scully way of course) that she would miss him professionally and personally. Scully’s demeanor this season, thus far, has definitely pushed their relationship in the romantic direction without explicitly stating as much. Perhaps that’s due to Gillian Anderson’s real-life pregnancy during this period, forcing her to wear bulky trench coats and remain office-bound. Additionally, Mulder is encouraged to continue pursuing X-files-like cases by a mysterious man within the FBI who continues to contact him, giving him vague statements of support. The X-files may have been disbanded, but “The Host” confirms for us that someone wishes them reinstated.

Overall, “The Host” is an excellent episode that blends focused, gruesome horror with enough plot momentum to move the mythology of the series forward. It doesn’t deal with aliens, but not all episodes really have to dip into that. Instead, it develops a new, unique creature and underlays that story with small hints and details about the future of the series. Representing the horrors man has on its environment, the Flukeman is a star of The X-Files, and “The Host” goes down in X-Files history as one of its most deranged and disturbed episodes.

Still, it’s no “Home…”

X-Files Flashback: ‘Little Green Men’

Season 2, Episode 1
Director: David Nutter
Writer: Glen Morgan, James Wong

I’m told the X-Files faithful don’t much like “Little Green Men,” the first episode of the second season. I’m not completely certain why. I think it’s a thrilling hour of television and shows all the earmarks of a show learning from its first season successes and failures and building upon them. It gracefully transports the audience from a place of despair (the dissolution of the X-files in the Season One finale) and brings us back to believing as we follow Mulder’s personal trajectory.

“Little Green Men” opens with a purposefully stuffy prologue akin to a science class filmstrip circa 1978. It digs into the history of NASA’s Voyager and the attempts made to contact extraterrestrial beings through a golden record filled with evidence of humanity’s glory. One of the listening stations in Puerto Rico, Duchovny explains with his deadpan narration, was shuttered due to government intervention. As the camera breaks through the wall and enters the facility, we see a series of long-dormant machines, all linked together to listen for a return call from E.T. Suddenly, the machines spring to life, and the message sent recorded on the golden record begins to play back to us.

Mulder and Scully, however, now lack the support of the X-files case load. Mulder is wasting away on never-ending stakeouts while Scully gives medical instruction in an autopsy lab. Both are changed people. Mulder, a shell of his former self, is full of self-doubt. He replays the incident of his sister Samantha’s kidnapping – the first time we see the full event – but doubts the validity of the memory and of his own sanity. Scully, on the other hand, has lost her hard, scientific edge. She wallows in the emotion of a motion, in this case the dissection of a human head. Events begin to unfold as Mulder’s secret government connection, a senator who has supported him for years, tells him of the Puerto Rican facility and of the recently received message.

Mulder escapes to Puerto Rico and there finds the evidence he seeks in terms of print-outs. He also finds a local man cowering in the bathroom of the research station. Speaking no English, the man draws a picture of a little green man on the wall of the facility. As Mulder reviews the machines, dramatic weather conditions begin to manifest outside causing the local to fear for his life and flee into the jungle. When Mulder attempts to bring him back, he finds the man’s corpse huddled beneath a tree, apparently dead from shock. Meanwhile, Scully does her best to evade detection and find Mulder on his Puerto Rican jaunt.

At the end of the episode, Mulder has another close encounter with an alien presence similar to the events surrounding his sister’s kidnapping. Rendered unconscious from the experience, Mulder is awakened by Scully who finally tracked him down to Puerto Rico. Just as they begin to investigate and collect evidence, a secret military operation begins to approach with directions to kill anyone in their way. Mulder and Scully manage to flee the scene with capture (or worse). Back in Washington, DC, Mulder is scolded by Assistant Director Skinner but, against the wishes of The Smoking Man, is returned to active duty on his surveillance case. The final scene shows Mulder attempting to make sense out of the seemingly black recording he took from the scene in Puerto Rico.

“Little Green Men” is a graceful blend of the best elements of the series: solid special effects, a tangible sense of threat/danger – often at the hands of our own government, and multiple alien interactions. The episode is densely plotting and atmospheric, but it’s never confusing or meandering. They have a long story to tell, and it’s relayed in a tight narrative. Layered over this is the still close relationship between Mulder and Scully. Even though the X-files are closed, they still maintain contact and their special bond. The trajectory of both characters within the episode take them in fascinating new directions – here is Mulder with a renewed sense of purpose and another encounter to reassure him that “the truth is out there.” Scully, meanwhile, went from a source of doubt and cynicism last year to one of emotion and belief. They even are allowed to share gentle, touching moments which clearly stokes the hint of passion between them. Plus, we actually get to see two “little” green men in the episode when the research station seems to become something of a Close Encounters homage. These events coupled with the ever mounting suspicion from the clandestine government conspiracy are more than enough to warrant a full-bodied recommendation of “Little Green Men.”

Upcoming: U2 Concert Specials and a Live Exorcism

Two wildly different television specials will air in the fall under an undoubtedly huge amount of publicity.

First, Destination America has announced the airing of the first live televised exorcism on October 30 – well timed for Halloween. Titled more like a musical than a horror event, Exorcism: Live! will be filmed at what is billed as “the original Exorcist House” near St. Louis where infamous exorcisms were allegedly performed on Roland Doe. Remember that this is not the first exorcism seen on television: Barbara Walters aired a filmed exorcism during a 20/20 special in 1991.

In lighter yet no less intense news, HBO will premiere two U2 concert specials in November. Airing first will be a behind-the-scenes documentary on November 7. That will lead into U2’s televised Parisian concert in Bercy Arena on November 14.

No word if any of the above-mentioned specials will feature pea-soup vomiting.