Matthew Heineman On His Oscar, Emmy-winning Doc ‘Cartel Land’

Cartel Land director Matthew Heineman talks about the dangers of filming a documentary about a Mexican drug cartel.

Cartel Land is a tense documentary that has you on the edge of your seat. Director Matthew Heineman takes you inside the Mexican drug war and introduces you to the drug lords that rule it. The documentary won both cinematography and directing awards when it screened at Sundance. It went on to be nominated for Best Documentary at the Oscars and now won an Emmy. I caught up with Heineman to talk about the risks of going into Cartel Land.

Cartel Land came out last year, then you were nominated for the Oscar, and now here you are nominated for an Emmy.

It’s been a crazy ride. I’m deeply humbled and never would have expected to be where I am now.

When did Cartel Land begin for you?

It started in June 2013, that’s when I started shooting it. I first heard about it in February of that year. I was reading about the U.S. side of the story, and I spent time gaining access to the vigilantes on the U.S. side of the border. I filmed there for 4 to 5 months. My father sent me an article about the autodefensas in Michoacan, Mexico. When I read that article, that’s when I knew I wanted to do a parallel portrait of vigilantes on both sides of the border. Two weeks after that I was in Mexico filming.

How did you get funding for the film and how did Kathyrn Bigelow get involved?

Like most documentaries, I could bore you with the long details, but I went out, shot the first shoot on my own and put some footage together. I showed it to a producer in New York, Tom Yellin, who started C-funding me. Eventually we got Molly Thompson and off we went. Kathryn didn’t come on until after Sundance. Someone sent her the link, we got together and met. I take a lot of inspiration from her work. So through those conversations, I asked if she wanted to come on board to help raise the visibility of the film, and she was willing to do so.

There are some truly scary moments in that documentary where even the viewer fears for you.

I’m not a war reporter, I’ve never been in any situation before. The shoot-outs, the meth labs, the torture chambers are all scenarios I never dreamt I’d be in. It’s an absolutely terrifying journey for a year, one that I wasn’t necessarily prepared for, and that took on a life of its own. I thought it was going to be a simple story, at least the Mexican side. A story of good versus evil and of everyday citizens rising up to fight against an evil cartel. Slowly over time I realized these stories were far more complicated and these lines were blurry. As these lines blurred and things got complicated, I became obsessed with who these guys were. I spent two weeks of every month for nine months in Mexico.

How do you watch someone having their daughter being taken from them? How do you watch those meth lab scenes? What’s that like for you as a journalist?

People often ask me how did I get that scene. There are several different answers. I poach the subjects with a level of respect. I told the folks in Mexico and Arizona that I had no pre-conceived notions, no goal, and I really wanted the story to evolve naturally. I really wanted to let the story play out. I spent a lot of time down there, almost nine months. In that time, I gained their trust. When you spend that much time with them, you develop a rapport. They’re risking their lives to fight for what they believe in.

With that scene, that never would have happened if I had knocked on the door and asked, “Can I hang out with you?” I was nine months into filming, we’re at the autodefensas base and they start jamming magazines into their guns, get into their cars. I asked where they were going, and they said they were going to get Starbucks. I barely speak Spanish. We literally weren’t speaking the same language, but we all knew they weren’t really going to get Starbucks. They let me go with them, and little did I know that we’d soon be in the middle of a shoot-out, getting shot at, falling out of the car, and going on a witch hunt through town.

That terribly devastating scene was deeply troubling to film. I was a foot away from them, and to see that unfold, as he’s being interrogated at gunpoint. As a human being, all I wanted to do was grab that gun and stop the madness, but my job is not there to police or change the course of events. My duty was to document what I was seeing, and to get in the torture chamber and the meth lab. It was just a matter of getting those doors open to be able to get in there.

How do you manage to stay safe and ensure your crew stayed safe?

It was a tiny crew. It was incredibly dangerous, and the key was never to be complacent and always have your antennas up. The first day of filming, I was scared shitless. Over time that changed, but not being complacent was the key. Even driving in Mexico with the doctor was scary because he had a bullseye on the back of his head.

Did you receive any threats?

There were countless moments, people tried taking the camera, men had masks on, but nothing terribly bad happened. I think we’re talking about the dangers that I had. The real danger was in the tragedy of the people in Michoacan living in a society where government has failed and where citizens are forced to take situations into their own hands. That’s also what drove me to make this: the tragedy that I was witnessing. The real losers are the people living on the ground who live in this lawless land, and the lines between government and cartel so blurry. That’s what makes living there and filming there so scary.

There’s a woman in the first act of the film when the autodefensas takes over the town, and they surround the army to get their guns back. Her anger was representative of so many things. Her entire family was killed by the cartel. She was too scared to go to the police because she thought the police would rat her out to the cartel, were the cartel, or were being paid by the cartel. All the things we take for granted, they don’t have.

We’ve got shows like Narcos, but the news here doesn’t tell us about the war on the cartels?

That’s exactly why I wanted to make this. We’re obsessed with terror around the world, and here’s terror on our doorsteps that we’re connected to and we’re responsible for. We’re funding this war through our voracious appetite for drugs. As long as there’s a demand for drugs, there will be a supply coming from South America and Mexico and, with that, the violence. Since 2007 over 100,000 people have been killed in the Mexican drug wars. Over 20,000 people have disappeared. Those are staggering numbers, and it’s right on our doorstep. One goal was to highlight this and show how it’s affecting people on the ground.

You did that in the sense that it’s really terrifying to watch. Aside from what you capture in the documentary, what challenges did you face?

There were so many. From a creative standpoint, it was one of the hardest films I’ve ever made just because the story kept changing. I was always on quicksand not knowing what was right and wrong. Every single day, month, the story evolved. Trying to make sense of it and trying to tell the story in a compelling and human way was the biggest challenge. On the end of it, I could be on a mission and look to my left or right, I could be with people and not know if I was with the cartel or the people fighting the cartel. From where I started that was a massive arc. When you’re on the ground trying to make sense of that, it was difficult.

How did they gain your trust?

That’s one thing I’m very lucky. The ones who aren’t are the journalists who were killed. There’s no question that by having a blue passport and being a gringo I had some level of protection. At the end of the day, if you’re in the middle of a shoot-out, the bullets aren’t concerned with the color of your skin.
For me, there were adrenaline filled moments. The interview I did with Milagros, and she witnessed him being chopped up to pieces and being burned to death. To see her body, it was as if her entire soul had been sucked out of her. The hollowness in her eyes stuck with me more than anything else.

 

Getting Down with Sophomore Slumps

Episode 92: Megan takes control as the Cooler gang tackle potential sophomore slumps for summer shows.

This week, we talk about the sophomore seasons of a slew of summer shows (say that three times fast) and whether they’re ready for junior year or need to revisit their freshman seasons for focus. Are you watching Mr. RobotDifficult PeopleCasual, or Fear the Walking Dead? Do you think these shows are avoiding sophomore slumps? We’re actually loving some of these second seasons. Join in the conversation and let us know what you think in the comments section.

We also talk about the most expensive show in TV history, Netflix’s The Get Down. We offer our review of the show and discuss whether all of the money was worth it. Plus, we also look at Emmy predictions for the Guest Comedy and Drama acting categories.

Finally, we close with the Flash Forward of what television most excites us in the upcoming week. Thanks for listening!

02:44 – Sophomore Slumps
47:23 – The Get Down
1:10:03 – Flash Forward

HBO Drops Full ‘Westworld’ Trailer

HBO unveiled two versions of the full Westworld trailer today: one “Mature” and one fit for general audiences. Honestly, I don’t see much difference in the two, so I’m only including the “Mature” one below. Personally, I could not be more excited for this newest HBO series. The visuals on display here are fascinating, and, as I’ve mentioned before, the cast is outstanding. Anthony Hopkins, Ed Harris, James Marsden, Thandi Newton, Jeffrey Wright, and Evan Rachel Wood star in this latest big-budget and hopefully high quality series.

Westworld drops October 2 at 9pm ET on HBO.

Aziz Ansari: Will He Become ‘Master’ of Emmy?

Aziz Ansari talks about the process of making his Emmy-nominated directorial debut in Master of None

I’m a huge fan of Aziz Ansari in all realms, so I probably embarrassed myself as I chatted with him. He possesses a manic, lovable energy on stage during his stand-up comedy, and his work on Netflix’s Master of None proved that he was more than just a funny guy. As the co-creator and writer, Ansari hit it out of the park with 10 mini movies about navigating your early 30’s in New York City. It feels both relaxed and thoughtful while maintaining a loose and funny tone. Aziz Ansari is one of the most successful comedians to transfer to a leading man on his own show.

When I spoke with him, Aziz surprised me with his soft tone. We talked briefly about the collaborative nature of the show, and I found out that his dad (breakout Shoukath Ansari who should have been nominated as Guest Actor in a Comedy Series) can’t wait to return as Dev’s father. Sometimes people think that comedians are supposed to make them laugh at all times, but Ansari proved again to be a defier of expectations.

I’m a huge fan of Master of None, and I’m a huge fan of you in general so I’m super excited to chat with you.

Oh wow. Thank you very much.

You wear three hats for Master of None. You’re the writer, director, star and co-creator of the show. Does it feel like you’re a captain of the ship?

Yeah, in a sense. It’s such a big team effort. Alan (Yang, co-creator of Master) has been with me through the whole thing, and Eric Wareheim (who plays Dev’s toweringly tall buddy Arnold) is a huge part of the show as well. Of course, he directed four of the episodes as well. You know, it’s so many people who worked so very hard on every aspect of the show, I try to help with everything that I can. Alan and I are pretty specific about everything from even the fonts in the titles and everything. But for each individual thing, there’s amazing people that help us get there. I would never want to take away from the remarkable team that we have.

I’m sure everyone tells you that they love your dad on the show. How was his reaction to when he read episode “Parents?”

He was like, “Whoa! So this is our story?” and I was like, “Yeah.”

Does he want to do more in Season 2? Is he really excited to come back?

Oh yeah! Now he’s pitching me ideas. My mom is trying to get out of doing Season 2. It’s pretty ridiculous.

I read recently that you’re really taking your time with developing Season 2. I really admire that you guys want to do it the right way and not just throw something out there.

Yeah, I think we never wanted to just make a Season 2 because we were on a schedule where it was like, “All right, it’s time to make the show!” We wanted enough of a breather to sort of refresh ourselves and have new ideas that we were just as excited about as the first season. We were trying to avoid the feeling of being rushed. We were very fortunate with how everything came out with the first season.

You’re nominated for directing and writing “Parents” (it’s also the episode submitted for Ansari’s personal acting category). Did you always have your eye on directing? 

I had always wanted to. A lot of mentors in my career always said, “You need to direct, you need to direct!” And at the time I wasn’t sure. It’s so much that I did it on Master of None instead of Parks and Recreation. On Master of None, as a writer and it being my show, I know I’d have a hand in it as far as how I imagine these scenes and everything. I knew exactly how I wanted it to look, so we assembled a great team to help us execute it. I think Alan and I had a very specific vision of how we wanted it to feel and we knew what we wanted the tone of it to be. That made it much easier.

Dev is obviously based a lot on your life. Would you say he’s a mere sketch of you?

There’s a long tradition of comedians playing some version of themselves. Some delve into their lives and exaggerate things or whatever. I don’t really know if I could make a list of the similarities and differences between us. There’s definitely some overlap.

One of my favorite things is that Dev is a huge foodie. New York City is a great place for that.

Alan, Eric and I, as well as a huge chunk of our crew, very much enjoy good food. I actually despise the word foodie. (Laughs) The restaurants we chose for the show and all the bars and everything are places that you can go. They were picked deliberately. The arc of the first season has that big element of food that plays into the finale.

If Dev was forced to eat one particular pasta for the rest of his life, would he ever be able to make that sort of decision?

Oh, no. If you’re familiar with the first season, you’d know that Dev would have to think about that for a long, long time.

You’ve been to the Emmys before. Are you anticipating the ceremony this time around?

I’ve gone before. It’s fun. You get to see your friends. It’s totally fun.

I’m actually in the process of reading your book, Modern Romance.  I was surprised that it was more of a sociology book, and the data is one of the most fascinating things about it. Would you be open to high schools or colleges adding that to their curriculum?

I think that’s happened already. Some college courses use it in their classes.

ClaireYou have a really great chemistry with Claire Danes in the episode “The Other Man.” Was she really down to do some more comedic stuff?

We knew that that’d be a really good part for somebody. I knew her personally, so I emailed her and she said she’d been wanting to do some comedy for a while. She thought it’d be really fun. We had a blast, and she was really fun to work with.

I just re-watched that episode last night. You guys are great together.

She’s such a pro and such an incredible actress, so it was great to work with her on that.

If there was an actual version of The Sickening (the sci-fi movie that is supposed to be Dev’s big break in Master), would you go out for it?

(Laughs) I don’t know. I mean, I guess it ends up being a pretty good movie.

I would love to see you in a big budget action movie like that.

Hopefully, after Master of None, I just continue to write and direct my own stuff, and I don’t have to follow Dev’s career.

Emmy Tracker: Comedy Déjà Vu?

Lead Actress in a Comedy Series

On September 18, Julia Louis-Dreyfus should further the record for the most consecutive Emmys for a single performance with her fifth Emmy for playing Veep‘s Selina Meyer. With 21 career nominations, she is one of the most beloved actors working in television today, and because of her popularity she’s probably the biggest acting lock of the night. She submitted “Mother” as her episode of the year, but it really doesn’t matter because almost any episode of the season would have shown off her incredible talent including “Congressional Ball” and “Inauguration.” The argument could be made that a lot of voters might think that JLD has enough Emmys and might want to spread the wealth, but with Veep growing in acting nominations as well as being on a path to a second series win that scenario grows increasingly unlikely.

Almost none of the other nominees seem to have the momentum to upset Louis-Dreyfus’s fifth consecutive win. Laurie Metcalf is clearly popular amongst her peers with three nominations this year alone, but Getting On is a little show that a lot of voters probably aren’t paying attention to. Lily Tomlin may be the only comedian in the group more revered than Julia Louis-Dreyfus, but as hard as Netflix pushed Grace and Frankie most Emmy voters don’t find the show to be award worthy. Amy Schumer probably doesn’t have the momentum to win when her show didn’t garner anywhere near the same amount of online coverage and support as compared to last year’s buzzy season. Leading up to the nominations, Ellie Kemper seemed to be rising in popularity because of her first SAG nomination, but after Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt severely underperformed in nominations this year the conversation around her dark horse status seemed to disappear.

To upset someone like JLD and her character Selena Meyer voters will probably be looking for the exact opposite type of performance: Tracee Ellis Ross in black-ish. Tracee Ellis Ross is infectiously likable, and Rainbow Johnson’s humor comes from being incredibly relatable, the exact opposite of Selena Meyer.  On top of giving an award-worthy performance, Tracee Ellis Ross is a beloved TV actress receiving her first Emmy nomination after over 15 years in the industry. A lot of voters might see her on the ballot, reflect on all her work throughout the years, and decide to award someone new. It’s similar to how Regina King finally won her first Emmy after decades of work in front of and behind the camera.

Current Ranking

Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Veep

Tracee Ellis Ross, black-ish

Ellie Kemper, Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt

Amy Schumer, Inside Amy Schumer

Lily Tomlin, Grace & Frankie

Laurie Metcalf, Getting On

Comedy
(Photo: ABC)

Lead Actor in a Comedy Series  

Like many of the other lead acting races this year, Lead Actor in a Comedy Series seems to be a shoo-in for last year’s winner, Jeffrey Tambor. He is the reigning winner not only at the Emmys but also the SAG awards, and the acting branch embraced the second season of Transparent even more so than the first. The Emmys haven’t always been accepting of dramedies in the comedy races, but Tambor’s iconic Maura Pfefferman easily stands out on a ballot compared to the other nominees.

The other contenders just don’t have the excitement behind them to rally the acting branch. Thomas Middleditch finally broke through the disconnect between the acting branch and Silicon Valley, but his introverted performance does not stand out next to a character like Maura Pfefferman. William H. Macy won over his peers before at the SAG awards, but Shameless never clicked with Emmy voters (besides a rogue guest win for Joan Cusack). Will Forte couldn’t win last year when critics and fans actually cared about The Last Man on Earth, and now that the show has forgotten its premise most voters aren’t going to turn to it now. Anthony Anderson is a likable presence that has been working in Hollywood for over 20 years, but voters will probably have a hard time justifying marking off their ballot for him when compared to iconic performances and auteur-like shows.

Aziz Ansari has been on Emmy voters’ radar since the beginning of Parks and Recreation, but his string of nominations this year is the first time voters have actually decided to recognize his work. As someone who co-wrote and directed his show as well as starring as a fictionalized version of himself, voters could find themselves in awe of a creative endeavor like Master of None. Even if some voters aren’t fans of Ansari, they could be swayed by “Parents,” one of the best episodes of television this past year from any program.  Performances like these haven’t always done well in the past, but with a new popular vote system (and Louie on hiatus) Ansari probably has the best chance at standing out against someone like Jeffrey Tambor, even if his win would be one of most surprising (and most welcome) surprises of the night.

Current Ranking

Jeffrey Tambor, Transparent

Aziz Ansari, Master of None

William H. Macy, Shameless

Anthony Anderson, black-ish

Thomas Middleditch, Silicon Valley

Will Forte, The Last Man on Earth

Comedy
(Photo: Netflix)

 

Outstanding Comedy Series 

When the Television Academy opened up voting to more members last year, popular voters chose Veep across the board as their favorite comedy of the year. The fourth season won two acting races, a writing award, a casting award, on top of the biggest comedy race of the night, Oustanding Comedy Series. Veep became only the second non-broadcast comedy to win the award, and the show is more popular than ever (16 nominations, 17 if you count the disqualified MacNicol). Before Season 5 premiered, there were whispered apprehensions on whether the show would retain its quality after the showrunner switched from Armando Ianucci to David Mandel. All of those suspicions were put to rest once the season actually premiered.

To win a best program Emmy, a show needs to have deep support across multiple branches. Only two other shows demonstrate the potential to excite the entire Television Academy: Transparent (10 nominations) and Silicon Valley (11 nominations). The tech startup comedy might not seem like an obvious Emmy contender, but over three seasons the show has racked up support with a lot of below-the-line branches. This year, it even gained its first acting nominee. The show’s one detractor is that the third season wasn’t that entertaining, and even if it has its fans it likely won’t excite more voters than a show like Veep. Transparent has the advantage of being probably the most emotionally stirring of the seven nominees and even comes across as cutting edge for its subject matter and being a streaming show. The show was probably very close to winning last year and even had won more awards than Veep leading up to the final award but voters have been notoriously weary of dramedies competing as comedies.

The rest of the nominees have a fraction of the cross-branch support that the three frontrunners have. Modern Family, Master of None, and Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt all have four nominations this year while black-ish is only nominated three times. In fact Modern Family is the only nominee of the four that can boast any sort of craft support with a sole sound mixing nomination. Veep has more nominees than the four bottom shows combined, and that says a lot about the overall support behind HBO’s political satire and is the biggest signifier that the Television Academy will re-elect Veep.

Current Ranking

Veep (HBO)

Transparent (Amazon)

Silicon Valley (HBO)

black-ish (ABC)

Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt (Netflix)

Master of None (Netflix)

Modern Family (HBO)

Emmy Nominee Lesli Linka Glatter On Directing ‘Homeland’

Lesli Linka Glatter talks about her Emmy-nominated direction of Showtime’s Homeland

Lesli Linka Glatter almost didn’t become a director. She had a sliding doors situation and, had she gone into a different coffee shop, she might still be a dancer or choreographer. A chance meeting with a stranger in Tokyo would change all that. Today, her resume spans over 20 years of work in film and television. She has worked on such shows as Mad Men, The West Wing, and E.R.

Glatter joined Homeland in Season 2 and has since continued to shoot tense, exciting, thrilling episodes of the show. Her continued excellent direction led to another Emmy nomination this year. It is her fourth nomination for direction of a drama series. I recently caught up with Lesli Linka Glatter in the midst of a location scout to talk Homeland and the whole Emmy scene.

Lesli Linka GlatterYou definitely keep it fresh and exciting, and the viewer never knows what you’re going to do next.

That’s really good to hear.

Your journey is something notable. You started off as a dancer, and here you are, Emmy-nominated director.

It’s been an incredible journey, exactly that. One of the things that amazes me is that nobody has the same path to doing what we do. Everyone’s path and journey are completely unique because we all come from whatever set of experiences we have and you bring it to the mix. It’s extraordinary.

That’s so true, and you see that when speaking to filmmakers and, as you say, that journey is never the same twice.

I ended up because I was a modern dancer, a choreographer and I spent all of my twenties overseas. I was in London and Paris, and then I got a grant to teach dance and choreography in the Far East. Had I not lived in Tokyo, Japan, and made a choice between which coffee shop to go into, one on the right or one on the left, I would have never directed. The story that I was told that became my first film was something that was told to me by an older Japanese gentleman. I had met him by chance, so had I gone into the coffee shop on the on the left, I would still probably be choreographing which is extraordinary because I love storytelling. I love what I’m doing. I love that I get to collaborate with an extraordinary group of artists who all have a point of view on a story that makes it singular, we’re all on the same page, telling a story. Again, we’re just beginning with Homeland Season 6. We have all this different input coming in, and a very compelling story to tell. You never get tired or bored because it always keeps you on the edge.

You came into Homeland on Season 2. What was that like coming in at that point?

When [Homeland producers] called me, I was already on another show as an executive producer and director. I was unavailable. When I saw the season airing, I thought, “Oh my God! This is amazing.” We’re all in storytelling and we can almost always figure it out. Was he a terrorist? Was he not a terrorist? Was she saying something that was absolutely true? Or was she crazy? What was going? I would end an episode being sure that it was going to go a certain way, but sure enough, they’d taken a detour.

I loved that about the story. When I was able to come in and direct the show, I ended up getting an extraordinary script. It was called “Q & A.” It was 40 pages in an interrogation room. When I read it, I freaked out and thought, “What am I going to do? How am I going to do it?” Then I realized I’d be in the room for 40 pages with the fearless Claire Danes and the amazing Damian Lewis with the scene that took twists and turns. Here you have a guy that has been held captive for eight years. How are you going to turn him? What are the turns that he has to make to open up? What does she need to do to get him to talk? Those were extraordinary things to be dealing with. That’s what I walked into, was this amazing piece of writing, and these incredible actors.

What’s also extraordinary is the mark you’ve made on the show. You own it.

Well, thank you. Luckily, I work with a great group of artists. Alex Gansa is an amazing collaborator who creates a great working environment where he encourages everyone to bring their A-game. Truly the best idea wins. When we went from the end of the third season, it had to be a completely new show, a reinvention. What was the show going to be? To be involved with that is incredible.

TV has time constraints. It’s not like you have a two hours to tell your story. How do you manage to pack tension into an hour and still tell your story?

On Homeland, we go through a lot of story which is the style of the show and really exciting on the storytelling level. One of the things for me having done both, because we have episode restraints, we shoot an episode in nine or ten shooting days, which is really short given we’re making an hour show. It’s very challenging so you really have to know what your story is about. If you only have that amount of time to shoot in, you have to know how to divide your day up. If you don’t know what your story is about, you’re not going to know where to spend your time.

You were filming under the Reichstag when the Paris bombings happened, and you changed the story. What made you feel compelled to change?

It was horrifying. We were telling the story about a terrorist attack in a European city. Getting up that morning and going to the subway, we gathered everyone together, and it was very difficult. Yes, there were adjustments made because how could you not? One of our directors, Michael Offer lived close to where the shootings took place and he would have to pass the corner where there were bullet holes. My assistant’s sister was sitting in one of the restaurants, so it felt very close. One feels a lot of responsibility with that. We are telling a story, but it’s a story that is based on a certain amount of research on the world we’re living in.

Let’s talk about the finale with Quinn and Allison. The things we never saw coming. It was quite a way to end the season.

[Laughs] Homeland has a very large graveyard and with every one we kill off there’s always a lot of sadness. Quinn is with the military of sorts. What happens to these guys that serve and try to protect us when something happens is a great thing to explore?

I can’t say a word, but Quinn is not dead.

Going back, you’ve done features. Now and Then I loved. Would you go back to feature film?

Oh sure. For me, it’s all about the material. I made a choice that I’m going to do TV. I had four movies fall apart before shooting, but what came my way was amazing writing in TV. How lucky am I that I get to do this? From Mad Men to Justified, these are great shows that tell complicated stories. I’d be thrilled to go do a movie. I’m chasing the material and not the format. If the best material comes to me, then that’s where it’s going to be.

On the subject of Mad Men, that was great. (Leslie directed “Guy Walks Into Advertising Agency”)

That was either going to be a disaster or something great because you had the lawnmower coming into the agency cutting off someone’s foot, but it turned out great. I love being challenged with these difficult stories, and how you find the balance. Homeland is about being authentically real, emotionally as well as storytelling.

What were you doing the day of the nominations?

I was on a scout in New York. I had no idea. I was blown away and thrilled for the show as it honors everyone. Dave Klein was with his daughter in the middle of Idaho with no cell service, so he didn’t know. It was such a wonderful celebration.

What’s the lasting appeal of the show?

That’s a great question. I think the appeal for me, personally, is that it looks at both sides. It doesn’t say this is how you should think or feel. It allows you to make decisions. Last year, Nina Hoss was questioning Laura, and they’re talking about the privacy issues. They’re on opposite sides of the issue, and they’re both correct. For me to try to do that and present all different sides of the issues is very exciting. Also, we have very compelling, multi-faceted characters. Carrie is so complicated, to be able to have that richly layered character, to Rupert who brought so much to Quinn. On so many levels, you get to dig deep.

Need a ‘Drag Race’ Refresher? Look No Further!

RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars
(Photo: Logo)
RuPaul’s Drag Race is a favorite among a few of the AwardsDailyTV writing crew. Megan and I basically plan our entire year around the premiere and duration around the seasonal reality show, but this year we are treated to a second race. RuPaul’s Drag Race All Stars starts its second season on Thursday night, and the anticipation is definitely revved up. In case you have somehow missed the first 8 seasons of RPDR, I am here to provide a crash course of all the contestants so you can become a superfan and join in on all the gaggery. Buckle up, hunty!

Adore

Queen: Adore Delano
Season: 6
Placement: Top 3
Most Known For: Pre-Drag Race, Adore was a contestant on season 7 of American Idol; performing a freakishly accurate Anna Nicole Smith dung Snatch Game; having the best hog body in Drag Race herstory.
Catchphrase: “Party!”
Post RPDR: She has released two albums since graduating, Till Death Do Us Party in 2014 and After Party in 2016
Number of Main Challenges Won: 3
Most Memorable Lip Sync: “Vibeology” by Paula Abdul; Adore sent Trinity K. Bonet home


RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars

Queen: Alaska Thunderfuck 5000
Season: 5
Placement: Top 3
Most Known For: Alaska was previously in a relationship with season 4 winner, Sharon Needles; the fiercest funky chicken dance you ever did see; can dress a family of 12 in a Party City tablecloth
Catchphrase: “HIIIIEEEE!!!”
Post RPDR: Alaska released her own album titled Anus; along with Drag Race contestants Willam and Courtney Act, Alaska was a model for American Apparel
Number of Main Challenges Won: 2
Most Memorable Lip Sync: Alaska is one of the only queens to never land in the bottom two. Werk, Pittsburgh queen

RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars

 

Queen: Alyssa Edwards
Season: 5
Placement: 6th place
Most Known For: Dancer extraodinaire; never being able to fully walk by a mirror; feud with Coco Montrese (but more on that later…)
Catchphrase: *mouth pop* (that I am still mad I can’t do!)
Post RPDR: Alyssa stars on her own vlog, “Alyssa Edwards’ Secret for WOWPresents
Number of Main Challenges Won: 1
Most Memorable Lip Sync: Well, damn, she was in the bottom two enough (SHADE!), but her best was against Roxxxy Andrews

RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars

 

Queen: Coco Montrese
Season: 5
Placement: 5th place
Most Known For: Feud with Alyssa Edwards; Janet Jackson impersonator in Vegas; accidental Doritos spokeswoman
Catchphrase: “I’M NOT JOKING BITCH!”
Number of Main Challenges Won: 1
Most Memorable Lip Sync: “Cold Hearted” by Paula Abdul where she sent Alyssa packing. Points for using those orange sleeves!

Detox

 

Queen: Detox
Season: 5
Placement: 4th place
Most Known For: Serving F-A-C-E and high fashion on the runway; silicon poster woman
Catchphrase: “I’ve had it! Officially!”
Number of Main Challenges Won: 1
Most Memorable Lip Sync: Detox is well known for her spastic jawline during lip syncs, but her best was when she sent Lineysha Sparx near the beginning of the season.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IblxaZzLS_0

Ginger

 

Queen: Ginger Minj
Season: 7
Placement: Top 3
Most Known For: Being a glamour toad; having her basement flooded on multiple occasions; …probably the true heir of the season 7 crown…too soon?
Catchphrase: “I’m sweet, petite, and ready to eat.” “I’m a cross dresser for Christ.”
Number of Main Challenges Won: 3
Most Memorable Lip Sync: Ginger didn’t lip sync much, but she did have to face off against Trixie Mattel dressed as both man and woman.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leBlpY-g9dk&list=RDleBlpY-g9dk

Katya

 

Queen: Katya
Season: 7
Placement: 5th and winner of Miss Congeniality
Most Known For: Being completely and utterly unpredictable; can spread her legs quicker than any other contestant; having the best laugh
Catchphrase: Katya doesn’t necessarily have a catchphrase as much as she has random quips; “I don’t jump for joy. I frolic in doubt.” “I am my own worst enema.” “I’m not young. I’m just ignorant.”
Post RPDR: Katya is working on a one-woman show titled, “Love Stories from my Vagina” but she can also be found on WOWPresents vlog “UNHhhh” with Trixie Mattel.
Number of Main Challenges Won: 2
Most Memorable Lip Sync: I don’t want to talk about when she got eliminated, because I will get too emotional…but she did sent Sasha Belle home.

Phi Phi

 

Queen: Phi Phi O’Hara
Season: 4
Placement: Top 3
Most Known For: Being the first true bitch in Drag Race herstory? Making everyone in Pittsburgh angry when she yelled at Sharon Needles; being unbelievably hot out of drag
Catchphrase: “Go back to Party City where you belong!”
Post RPDR: Phi Phi is currently publishing “365 Days of Drag” on her Instagram (her drag has obviously evolved from spray tan, Trump chic), and everyone should be impressed by her jaw-dropping cosplay
Number of Main Challenges Won: 2
Most Memorable Lip Sync: Phi Phi and Sharon Needles faced off in one of the most spastic lip syncs of all time but the entire thing was moot since Willam was disqualified.

 

Roxxxy

 

Queen: Roxxxy Andrews
Season: 5
Placement: Top 3
Most Known For: Being juicy and not apologizing for it; mispronouncing “sequins” and defending it; having a wig underneath a wig…case closed.
Catchphrase: “Where my people at?!”
Number of Main Challenges Won: 3
Most Memorable Lip Sync: She. Had. A. Wig. Underneath. Her. Wig.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGIImEQSfVg

Tatianna

 

Queen: Tatianna
Season: 2
Placement: 4th
Most Known For: Pulling off an eerily good Britney Spears illusion and winning the first Snatch Game; sexiness for days; single handedly responsible for gay men questioning their sexuality
Catchphrase: “Thank you.”
Number of Main Challenges Won: 1
Most Memorable Lip Sync: Tatianna managed to send fan favorite Jessica Wild packing even though she was dressed like a sexy prisoner

Who are you rooting for this season? Are you thrilled that Ro-Laska-Tox is reuniting? Are you secretly hoping that Alyssa and Coco reignite their feud? If you need something to do while you watch the premiere, head over to Chad Sell’s website to download some coloring sheets of each queen!

Ben Mendelsohn Leaps From ‘Animal Kingdom’ To ‘Bloodline’

Ben Mendelsohn talks to AwardsDaily TV about his second Bloodline Emmy nomination.

One of the most recognizable faces in film and on TV, Ben Mendelsohn came to many viewers’ attention late through the success of the powerful Australian film Animal Kingdom. The 2010 Australian crime thriller also catapulted Joel Edgerton and Jacki Weaver (Oscar nominee) career-wise. With Bloodline Season 2, Mendelsohn returns to the role that garnered his first Emmy nomination and won a second Emmy nomination. That’s no small feat given that his character, Danny Rayburn, died in the Season 1 pilot.

I know a little bit about your career and will hit Bloodline in a second. But going back, when and how was the acting bug first discovered for you? When did you know you wanted to be an actor? 

It was pretty much after I got my first real job, which was The Henderson Kids. I did [some acting] at school and stuff, and liked that, but it was when I actually got my first job. After I had an experience of it, that’s when I wanted to keep going.

And what for you are the highlights in Australian TV looking back? 

I think The Henderson Kids is the highlight of the television stuff. There were shows that were failures that I really enjoyed and got to learn, I guess, a bit more about how to do it. After that, the highlight for me was the My Voice Broke which once was a television thing then became a film. Then after that I started doing a lot of films.

Yeah, I know a lot of people won’t have heard of your old films. I know My Voice Broke and The Big Steal

They were forever ago now, decades ago. And people would not have been familiar with me until recently.

You were making it quite big then though, scoring quite high. What were your aspirations then? Where you wanting to do American films, or where you happy where you were? 

I wanted to be able to keep going. I was a little bit concerned what I see happening a bit, people would be everywhere for like a year, and then be completely gone. That things were going very well and just hoping they would last, that was my main concern. It was not until much later that I started thinking about getting work in America or in the U.K. I would come and try to get work there. But without actually moving there and being there, it was tougher than I expected it was going to be. I did a film in that period called Spotswood with Tony Hopkins. So it didn’t feel like it would necessarily be a great distance to be going forward or upwards.

We have to talk about Animal Kingdom, then. I don’t know if you are sick of talking about it. 

No, no, I am not at all. There is no doubt without Animal Kingdom it is very hard to see anything that has come up happening. Animal Kingdom was one of the most important things I have ever done. None of the other stuff happens without Animal Kingdom. Bloodline doesn’t happen without Animal Kingdom. And a lot of other stuff as well, so it was incredibly important. I did not have any expectations in anything really, but it [Animal Kingdom] really grabbed people’s attention.

It was a great performance. And you made that yourself with that performance, the character as well. I remember watching it and as soon as your character entered the film you knew there was going to be a lot of trouble. It was such a good performance. I know Jacki Weaver got a lot of the plaudits and the Oscar nomination. Not sure where your Oscar nomination was. 

Well, thank you very much. Look, it is well and right that Jacki got the attention and the love for what she did. That film has been pretty awesome for anyone that did it, and they have done incredibly well. It has been awesome for me. I felt pretty good about it. I was very fortunate that I got the opportunity. David Michôd’s fantastic characterizations were really vivid. And really fucking scary at times. He is a terrifying person. You get those films, there are plenty of them in the U.K., and certainly a lot of them in Australia. I had a lot of unsupervised time around some pretty dodgy Melbourne suburban jail types, so I have seen those people in my life. They make a real impression on you.

So that transition from Animal Kingdom opened a lot of doors. Did it play any part on your personal life, not just your career, what with moving back and forth, family, and stuff like that? 

It did good things all around. You move around a lot doing this game generally. You are very lucky if you are. Means you are working. It is something you get used to very early on. It has been only good.

Let’s move on to Bloodline, the Netflix original show. Do you feel you were born to play Danny Rayburn? Is it a role you looked for or did someone approach you? 

No, the creators came to me when they were getting it together. They spoke to me pretty early on in the proceedings. I did not know who was going to be in it at this stage, who those guys were. Then I was delighted when I heard Sissy Spacek and Sam Shepherd were in it. That was a pretty big day.

Ben Mendelsohn

Yeah, that’s a bonus. What I like about you, [Danny] is quite menacing. He is a bit of a bad guy. What I like is you can almost tell you are enjoying playing the role without giving that away – if that makes sense. You really fit the character. 

Oh thank you. I think he is enjoyable to play. Most characters are fun to play, but Danny is pretty special. You perhaps only get one shot at someone like him in your life. I am glad it has happened.

How did you approach the second season of Bloodline differently given that you were playing your brother’s guilty conscience on one hand plus the flashbacks with your son. You must have had to approach that differently. 

You do think about it, you try a few spins on things. I did not have a concrete idea about them, the idea you are playing someone that is part of someone else in terms of John. He was kind of his guilty conscience, someone else’s feeling of that guy. I think you just try stuff. It was freer to try different things, but you do that anyway. It added more of a kind of dream-like quality. It was quite disconnected. And the backstory stuff was kind of a hopeful time, the beginnings of Danny’s real struggle with the things that are going to come home to roost for him. In that sense it is more familiar territory as the first season. It was a variation on the same thing.

When you read the first season script, what happened? Did you read it and think, “Oh well that’s me. Done?” or did you know what would happen? 

No, I knew from the first time I met those guys. It would be weird going into a series like that, not knowing they were going to kill the brother. Season 1 is really just the prologue for Bloodline. What they open up next season is when you will really see what they are intending. Danny is just a prologue for what is going to come. Season 2 is really just starting to take off, hitting speed now. By the time you get to, touch wood, Season 3 and 4, they will be up where they have been planning to be. So you have only just got the start of it, and I knew the whole time.

So two Emmy nominations now, so congratulations for both. 

Thank you.

Well deserved, I think. Last year, I honestly thought, and I am not just saying this, that you might win it. It was between you and Jonathan Banks (Better Call Saul), and neither of you won. The Emmy voters are a fickle bunch. 

I know.

So do you pay much attention to awards buzz? 

You are always aware of them. You do what you do on a set, and it is all very nice to be acknowledged. But it does not affect what you do. It is not like the FA Cup. You are not doing it for silverware. It is nice, but it is not what you do it for.

What is next for you then? A feel-good family drama? A superhero movie? What do you want to do next? 

I think I will be doing a [Steven] Spielberg film. Which should be very much your big summer movie type affair. And that looks pretty exciting. And perhaps something a little closer to home in the U.K. that is. We will see. The ball is rolling fine.

Since Animal Kingdom I am a fan. Congratulations on the Emmys and the career. Look forward to seeing what you do next. Just keep us watching. That is all I ask. 

Thank you mate. Thank you very, very much. That is the game, just try to be interesting in whatever it is. So thank you, I appreciate that.

Ben Mendelsohn is joined by co-star Kyle Chandler as acting nominees in this year’s Emmys. Bloodline is available to stream on Netflix.

Production Designer James Pearse Connelly Helps ‘The Voice’ Sing

Emmy-winning production designer James Pearse Connelly describes his inspiration for The Voice Season 10’s Emmy-nominated style

On the day of our interview, Emmy-winner James Pearse Connelly received the kind of early morning phone call that only happens in Hollywood.

“Hey, we need to shoot Christmas tomorrow!,” Connelly laughed. “What can you do to make it throw up Christmas? Well, first off, it’s never throw up. Second, it’s always a running scramble. Somebody go get a frickin’ Santa!”

James Pearse Connelly

Such goes the life of a highly sought-after production designer.

Now serving as a governor for production design at the Television Academy, James Pearse Connelly won his first Emmy back in 2009 as an art director on the 2008 MTV Music Video Awards. Subsequent Emmy nominations came from NBC’s The Voice with Season 10 brining Connelly his latest nod. Connelly and his creative design services company J.P. Connelly boast a robust resume that includes television, film, and live events, but it’s his work on unscripted (reality) television programming that has Emmy standing at attention.

On finding his way to production design

With an art teacher mother and architect father, James Pearse Connelly’s childhood was surrounded by art and variations of design. After exploring other disciplines outside of art, he returned to the world when he found his niche in the drama club, working primarily backstage. That experience led to a stage design program at Rutgers University where the infamous lightbulb moment happened.

“I remember thinking that very first day, ‘You mean all I have to do is read a play, understand it, and make a diorama box about it?’ Like, that’s totally me,” Connelly said. “And I’m literally still doing it.”

After graduation, the massive impact of September 11, 2001, limited the possibilities of starting a new career in New York City. Connelly then relocated to California where he “caught the reality unscripted wave.” Opportunity after opportunity began to present themselves, and James Pearse Connelly built a career out of reimagining those diorama boxes time after time.

On giving The Voice a new tone

While Connelly and his team keep things fresh by working on a variety of projects, his interpretation of the role of design in an unscripted television series keeps him coming back to the genre.

“To me, in an unscripted show, the environment becomes the script,” Connelly said. “I think that behavior is really determined by an environment plus personality. Once you mash those two together, you get a lot of television behavior. I can really effect what’s not just on camera – the pretty lamp – but also what really is the driving personality on camera sometimes and give motivation for that.”

James Pearse Connelly
(Photo: NBC)

Connelly finds working on NBC’s The Voice particularly exciting because the creative team embraces and advocates change year after year. The partnership proved successful as Connelly merited four Emmy nominations for his work on the show since 2013. Season 10 provided the most significant challenge as Connelly needed to reinvent the entry and build-up to the primary audition. To achieve that, Connelly called back to a day on the Universal Studios Hollywood backlot where he put himself in a Voice contestant’s awestruck shoes.

“I wondered what it must be like for these artists to drive through the Universal gates to see this stage and this television production wonderland everywhere, and so I really wanted to capture that,” Connelly said. “The next day, I took a GoPro with an associate of mine, and we shot just as much as we could to get all the rich texture of production around the lot… That authentic journey is really mine, and now everybody gets to experience it.”

James Pearse Connelly
(Photo: NBC)
James Pearse Connelly
(Photo: NBC)

Making the Case: Better Call Saul

In an on-going series, Clarence Moye makes the Emmy® case for Better Call Saul to win the Outstanding Drama Series Emmy. As the Emmy voting period winds down, the writers of AwardsDaily TV will pour out their hearts and minds to try and convince Emmy voters to follow their expert opinions.

AMC’s Better Call Saul

Metacritic: 85
Rotten Tomatoes: 97%
Number of Nominations: 7
Major Nominations: Drama Series, Lead Actor (Bob Odenkirk), Supporting Actor (Jonathan Banks)

Better Call Saul represents television’s current greatest underdog story. It’s fitting that the sophomore season of AMC’s hit continues to face HBO’s juggernaut Game of Thrones in the Drama Series race. All evidence points to a Game of Thrones win, and you can hardly argue with what feels inevitable. Still, it’s not difficult to imagine a Better Call Saul Game of Thrones duel as the Emmy incarnation of the series’ persistent Jimmy McGill / Hamlin, Hamlin & McGill rivalry. Everyone loves an underdog, right?

The second season of Better Call Saul provides an overall enrichment of its successful first season. I’m convinced that’s because the series learned to embrace the capabilities of their incredibly talented cast. Case in point, the evolution of Rhea Seehorn’s Kim Wexler from onlooker supporting player in Season 1 to an adventurous and risk-taking force to be reckoned with in Season 2 provides some of the most rewarding television in all of 2016. Tell me you can’t immediately recall her desperate cold-calling scene (brilliantly photographed through a series of Post-It Notes). Tell me you didn’t cheer when she snagged the longest of long shots in actually winning new business. Don’t pretend you weren’t intrigued by her overstepping the moral and legal limits with Jimmy McGill (Bob Odenkirk) as they con deserving marks together. Kim Wexler’s growth as a character and Rhea Seehorn’s growth as an actress was the single most thrilling aspect of Better Call Saul Season 2. That she wasn’t Emmy nominated for her brilliant performance… Shame. Shame. Shame.

Forgive me from borrowing from that “other show.”

Better Call Saul
(Photo: AMC)

But Wexler’s ascension in Season 2 hardly proves the only memorable moments. The complexity of Jimmy’s relationship with brother Chuck (Michael McKean) escalated to near-unbearable heights by season’s end. Those who complain the series takes too long to unravel its plot points (a.k.a. “It’s too slow”) probably don’t appreciate the fine art of character building. It takes time to carefully lay the groundwork for “Big Moments.” We needed to feel Chuck’s desperation at remaining relevant as brother Jimmy seemed to be pulling it together. We needed to feel Chuck’s confusion and panic as Jimmy sabotaged Chuck’s legal case to win minor legal battles of his own. The season may have ended with a much-dreaded cliffhanger, but, to me, the earlier scene between Jimmy and Kim in Chuck’s darkened home provided more thrills. After stretching the boundaries of her morality, Kim Wexler ignores Chuck’s seemingly paranoid, but entirely accurate, theory on Jimmy’s sabotage. She sides with Jimmy over Chuck. She chooses the morally vague path. It’s as cataclysmic an event as the Red Keep explosion at the end of Game of Thrones.

Oh, there I go talking about “that show” again.

Better Call Saul Season 1 was a fine, accomplished season. It gave Bob Odenkirk an amazing opportunity to recast his famous Breaking Bad character Saul Goodman in a new, less experienced light. It realized a lot of fun moments in the process. However, Season 2 provides a deeper, more complex, more resonant, more rewarding experience because it finally starts expanding the world beyond Jimmy McGill. Sure, he’s still the star of the show, but now we’re becoming familiar with a broader array of characters. Vince Gilligan gives the great Odenkirk more colorful palate of characters off which to play in Season 2. And what a thrill that is to behold.

It’s time to put away the Breaking Bad comparisons and accept Better Call Saul on its own terms. It’s such a tonally different show that comparisons feel arbitrary. Maybe that’s why the Television Academy feels behind the curve in recognizing its greatness. They can’t let go of Walter White. It’s their loss, though. As brilliant as Breaking Bad was, it’s time to embrace something new and challenging in its own unique way. Better Call Saul ranks as the kind of show that grows in esteem over time. It holds its cards close to the vest and makes you work to appreciate how incredibly well attuned it really is. The writing, the direction, and the breathtaking cinematography (all of which were criminally ignored this year by the Television Academy) are all hallmarks of a great show. Better Call Saul more than lives up to the reputation of its predecessor, and it deserves equal footing, award-wise.

Again, the Game of Thrones coronation feels inevitable. I can hardly argue with that myself given the vast scope, the emotional trauma, and the legitimate shock value registered by that classic series. Yet, human nature inspires us to root for the underdog on occasion. Better Call Saul is one such underdog worthy of a thousand Emmys. Let it not be buried in the shadow of similar greatness.