Paul Haggis On ‘Show Me a Hero’ and the Oscar-winning ‘Crash’

ADTV talks to Oscar-winner Paul Haggis about his HBO miniseries Show Me a Hero

Speaking to Paul Haggis, a man who has been behind the camera and keyboard in both the film and TV industry for decades, proves there is often more to filmmakers than meets the eye. I discovered he is a perfectly pleasant guy and, as we’ve witnessed on a few occasions, does not shy away from expressing his personal opinion.

I spoke to Paul Haggis while he was in Canada visiting family. We discussed not only his HBO television miniseries Show Me a Hero, but we also dug into his background with Scientology, the rise of his TV career, and of course the homophobia theories surrounding his film Crash defeating Brokeback Mountain for Best Picture in 2006.

AwardsDaily TV: Hello Paul Haggis. It’s not often you get to speak to back-to-back Oscar winning Best Picture writers. That’s pretty rare.

Paul Haggis: [Laughs] I was very blessed to have good material.

ADTV: Let’s break the ice a little bit then. So you’re the audience now. Think about the last year. Which films and TV shows have impressed you the most? Do you have time for anything?

PH: Oh yeah. My daughter got me into watching Bloodline, which I quite love. On the second season of that, it started very slowly, but I really love it. And I finally started up on Game of Thrones. I knew I would enjoy it too much so I avoided it for many years. I just knew it would take up too much of my life. So I am just now on the second season and devouring it. It’s nice to be so far behind everyone else.

ADTV: What would you say is one of your proudest moments outside of your TV and film work?

PH: There’s what I do in Haiti. I’ve been doing that for nine years. I really love that – the Artist for Peace and Justice. We head down there again this week, taking a great big group of people down because were celebrating the very first graduating class of our high school. So we got 2,700 kids, and we are graduating 300 of them this year for the first time. The amazing thing is it is the only high school for the kids in slums. I am very proud of that accomplishment. And of course the Artists institute, with film school and audio engineering school. That makes me very proud. You stand on that ground we bought, you know, with Olivia Wilde and Ben Stiller. We all went down there and did it. You stand there now and watch two 2,600 kids run past. [Laughs] It’s pretty extraordinary. I can’t help but smile.

Paul Haggis
Photo courtesy of Paul Schiraldi – HBO

ADTV: Now, I am not going to delve too deep into Scientology.

PH: Yeah, it’s been done.

ADTV: The question I will ask, did you receive any kind of blow-back from Going Clear in relation to future projects like the one you have just done, Show Me a Hero?

PH: No. Everything they do is gossip and rumor and stuff online, anonymous things they post to try and influence people. Like my work is not very good or whatever. Not just me but loads of people, especially celebrities or minor celebrities that end up leaving. They try to trash their reputation, but I don’t give a damn what people think of me. [Laughs]

ADTV: Say someone who doesn’t know you asks you “What do you do for a living?” What do you respond with? Writer? Director? Producer?

PH: I tell them I am in the film business.

ADTV: You don’t see yourself as one thing more than another?

PH: No, I love writing. I love directing. I especially love whatever I am not doing at that particular time. If I am writing I would dearly love to be directing. If I am directing, I would much rather be writing. But that’s just because I am a contrarian and a miserable sop. [Laughs] In this case with Show Me a Hero, I just directed and produced. I did none of the writing, which was just fabulous for me. That’s the first time I have ever done that. It was such a relief. You get an actor come to you with a question, and you say, “Oh that’s a really good question. Why don’t you talk to David about that?” [Laughs] It’s wonderful to have people to collaborate with. [Producers] David [Simon] and Nina [Kostroff-Noble] were such wonderful collaborators. We all made each other uneasy, and that’s the best thing for artists.

ADTV: So thinking about TV. You’ve worked on popular shows like Due South and L.A. Law, shows I watched when I was a teenager. And you have already grabbed two Emmys for writing and producing Thirtysomething. What do you remember about the success of that show? And that time.

PH: Oh yeah, I was in my early thirties and working with two terrific filmmakers in Marshal Herskovitz and Ed Zwick. I’d only written comedy, I had never written drama in my life, other than some failed screenplays I had attempted. They were so generous to me. They really allowed me to find my voice and prodded me to look inside and find dilemmas, find questions, that I could not answer myself. That went with me through my career, so I am eternally grateful to them.

ADTV: Earlier this year I know Oscar Isaac won the Golden Globe for his performance as Nick Wasicsko in Show Me a Hero. Are you feeling the award buzz for this show going into Emmy voting?

PH: I don’t really pay much attention to the Golden Globes to be honest. It’s more of a show than anything else. They are lovely, but I don’t really take to awards shows. I got one, really like them. I know it is a shitty thing to say this, but I don’t take them that seriously. I think when you get rewarded from your peers you take them more seriously, like the Emmys or the Oscars. Though you get the serious press like the New York Film Critics, I have never got one but I appreciate it. Even the Gotham Awards I like. I liked the fact Oscar [Isaac] won, and I would like to win another one. I am as shallow as the next person. Perhaps they are getting more legit. What do you think?

ADTV: I think it’s really tricky now with TV. Five years ago with something like Limited Series Emmys you could maybe predict it, “Oh there’s only two that can win it.” Now people are talking about the Limited Series because there are so many now that the competition is ridiculous. And if you get in you’re lucky, I think. Your show is there or thereabouts.

PH: Yeah, yeah, we’d be very lucky to be on the shortlist. I would be thrilled, but it’s not why we do things. It does bring attention to the work of of others. The actors we had – Catherine Keener, James Belushi, Jon Bernthal, Alfred Molina, Oscar [Isaac] – amazing work. I would love to see them recognized.

ADTV: It’s a fine series. Well acted and well executed on a very consistent level too. Many six parters can dip. For example, episodes four and five were not as good, but Show Me a Hero was consistent all the way through. So congratulations on the show.

PH: Thank you. That really is the collaboration with David. He brought out the best in us.

ADTV: Did the series turn out how you envisioned it?

PH: Well I was very happy. The thing I was most scared of, we had to shoot this on a schedule and a budget, much smaller and faster than most of us had ever done before. I was shooting six to ten pages a day on five or six locations in different time periods. And also shooting riots with a thousand people, a hundred, fifty, so finding a way to make it feel like you are in a crowd like you were under attack, bombarded with hatred. That was that was my biggest fear but my biggest success.

ADTV: Does your directing style alter when shooting the six-hour series to, say, a TV episode or a feature film?

PH: First of all I don’t have a style, so that helps. Directors shouldn’t have a style. I know some that do, but I think the style should be dictated by the piece and the story itself ought to tell you how it will be shot. And you better listen, if you don’t you might be forcing it into something it is not. I was happy with the way Show Me a Hero turned out. If you look at Crash and In The Valley of Elah, those are two different styles of films, visually. In one the camera never moves, and has short lenses, in the other it’s handheld or Steadicam and probably moving.

I let the story dictate, and you have to have humility to do that. I don’t know how much I have. You can’t be the guy going “Look at me, look at me, I am the director.” We should disappear. The director should disappear. That’s what I loved about Spotlight this year, he [Tom McCarthy] just disappeared. He just served the piece. And yes there are some really flashy directors out there, and they do things that leave us in awe, thinking “What a cool shot.” I mean I love cool shots, love doing them, but you have to fight the ego. All the time. What’s the best way for this story to be told? It’s to put the camera down and do a close up you idiot. [Laughs]

Paul Haggis
Photo courtesy of Paul Schiraldi – HBO

ADTV: Looking at the surface of it from the outside, if that is possible, do you think the political subject matter, the knowledge of public housing, and class affairs in the 80’s and 90’s could have been a tough sell? What made this compelling to you as a potential directing project?

PH: Oh yeah, I would never buy that show. Thank God we have HBO. I mean, a 6-hour miniseries about zoning and public housing – come on! I loved the minutiae of the storytelling. The same thing we did with Thirtysomething, finding the drama in the small moments and decisions and portrayals. Hoping for someone to have your back, and they don’t omit the pettiness of life, the real drama. It is hard to do, but if we celebrate who we are as human beings… The wonderful thing about Oscar, he just dove in. Didn’t care if I made him look bad, knowing that it would make the character all the more heroic.

ADTV: Do you have plans to make more movies as a writer and director? Or TV?

PH: I have some TV ideas, trying to push them forward. Hoping to start shooting a movie in the UK.

ADTV: How did you land Million Dollar Baby and Casino Royale? Great gigs.

PH: Weren’t they great. I loved those so much. Million Dollar Baby I wrote for myself and tried to sell it, get financing for six years. As I was shooting Crash, Clint Eastwood stepped up and said he wanted to direct it. That was a decision I had to make as I owned the material and was going to direct it.

ADTV: Yeah you must have had to think hard about that. It is only Clint Eastwood. [Laughs]

PH: Yeah. Shit, it was Clint Eastwood, one of my favorite directors. And I got to work with him two more times.

ADTV: Before I let you go, we have to touch on Crash. Probably sick of it. For me, and I saw it twice on the big screen, two scenes stayed with me for a long, long time. The “crash rescue” scene and the “magic cloak” shooting scene with the little girl. Great scenes, hairs on the back of your neck scenes. That’s why we go to cinema.

PH: Thank you, thank you. I’m very proud of it.

ADTV: Of course Mark Isham helped.

PH: Yes, yes. Absolutely great music. Someone caught me at some premiere, the press are always trying to do this, they asked if I really thought Crash was the best film at the Oscars that year. I mean, what sort of asshole is going to say yes? [Laughs] No, there were great films that year. How fabulous it was to be on that list, and then of course it comes out and wins the Oscar. These bullshit theories with Hollywood being homophobic, oh please. Half the people we work with in Hollywood are gay. Ridiculous. Would they rather be called racist, is that more comfortable? If your favorite film loses, and I love Brokeback Mountain, and the others, beautiful films, but people are sore losers. I lost with Million Dollar Baby, and you didn’t see me saying Sideways is not a good enough script – it is a great script. People should grow up.

ADTV: You can’t please everyone.

PH: You want to be up there with other great films. It is the luck of the draw. These writers and directors I admired so much. That was the thrill for me – to be mentioned in the same breath as Ang Lee, Steven Spielberg, and George Clooney.

ADTV: So is that how you saw that whole homophobia thing and the racial thing with your film? You thought it was nonsense?

PH: It is nonsense to say Hollywood is homophobic. It’s like saying Broadway is homophobic. Just ridiculous. So much of the artists in our community are gay – and proudly so. They are a big part of our creation on every show. However, there are things that are true, like with women, it was a long time before they were included. Women directors are being recognized. More people of color are being recognized. Those are the walls. I demonstrated against Prop 8. I think you would be hard pressed to find someone on Broadway or in the film business that are homophobic.

ADTV: Okay. Are you going to the Emmys this year?

PH: I am not big on awards shows or film festivals. I go, and am very happy if I am nominated, to go and represent the picture. I haven’t been to the Emmys in a long time. I live in New York now. The awards seasons are a bit distant to me.

 * * * * *

Directly following our conversation, I received the following email from Paul Haggis, with additional comments to his previous opinions on the supposed homophobia in Hollywood:

“Robin,

As a longtime proponent of gay rights, as a guy who was demonstrating in the streets of LA when our state government was trying to ban gay marriage with Prop 8, I didn’t want to give you the impression that I think there is no homophobia in Los Angeles. Of course there is. There’s homophobia everywhere, as there is hatred of minorities everywhere. You saw what happened this weekend – hateful intolerant small minded people are hateful intolerant small minded people.

What I was saying is that the gay and lesbian community is a driving creative force in Hollywood. For people outside of LA to accuse the Academy, which draws its entire membership from our creative community, of being homophobic, based on comments made by one actor, might be a tad self-serving. Do you really believe they watched Crash, which accuses liberals of harboring racist feelings, and thought “Yes, I love being accused of racism, let me vote for that one.” There were two nominated movies that year with gay protagonists. If the academy is so homophobic, how did that happen?

To my mind, a much more compelling argument was made last year, when activists called for more women and people of color to in central creative and decision making positions in our industry.

Best
Paul”

Jeremy Piven Closes the Door On ‘Mr. Selfridge’

Emmy-winner Jeremy Piven talks about the inspiration behind Masterpiece’s Mr. Selfridge

When talking to Emmy-winner Jeremy Piven (HBO’s Entourage), one thing becomes immediately clear: the actor is incredibly passionate about his involvement with Masterpiece’s Mr. Selfridge. The role of Harry Selfridge, a department store impresario who moved from Chicago’s Marshall Fields to start Selfridge’s in the United Kingdom, is a significant departure from Piven’s most famous roles. His near-encyclopedic knowledge of Selfridge’s life provides evidence into the great deal of research Piven did to fully become Harry Selfridge.

Despite having won three Emmys as Entourage‘s Ari Gold, Jeremy Piven’s turn as Harry Selfridge feels like a fresh start for the actor who allowed himself to explore emotional depths not seen in your typical Masterpiece production. An Emmy nomination would be a recognition of this growth and of the merits of the series itself which ended its four-season run this spring on PBS.

Jeremy Piven
Photo credit: Jammi York.

AwardsDaily TV: So, Jeremy Piven, Mr. Selfridge is a departure for you as an actor. What drew you to the material initially?

Jeremy Piven: I think, like a lot of Americans, we’ve been drawn to British period dramas. When this came about, it was an opportunity to attempt to inhabit a guy who was an American in the midwest from where I’m from in Chicago. He made his way in Marshall Fields and ultimately kind of invented the department store and the culture of shopping. He was a authentic guy that was someone we never knew about and created Selfridge’s which is, to this day, a very prominent store in the UK. I thought his story was fantastic. He was someone that was incredibly innovative and creative. He was this beautiful contradiction. He lived in these dualities, and that’s what I find fascinating in characters.

He was such a hard-working, prolific guy during work hours, and then, when he wasn’t at the store, he kind of rabbled a bit. He had this incredibly colorful life. The more I read, the more I was fascinated by him. [The creative team] really knew what they wanted to do. They had it all mapped out. Unlike American shows, they knew what they wanted to do for four years and had it all outlined. In terms of his trajectory, it was as true as it could possibly be, and then they used dramatic license with the rest of the characters that surrounded him. I just thought it was an opportunity to go over and work with these beautiful, brilliant, British actors in a piece that I thought would be a really fun adventure. And it was!

ADTV: Ironically, your iconic role as Ari in Entourage was far flashier than Harry Selfridge, but Selfridge is far more deconstructed as a human being. Far more of a mess. Ari is kind of toothless comparatively, don’t you think?

JP: Ari had an incredibly volatile presence obviously, and he was totally overly emotionally invested. As an actor, it’s just so fun to play in that space. And Harry was a turn of the century gentleman. He was one of these guys that you wouldn’t suspect would go out galavanting at night and was a risk junkie. He fancied himself a creative entity – an artist. He found art in retail, and he was very drawn to any type of risks. He was a gambler and fell in love early on with a stage star at the time and then ultimately with the Dolly sisters who represented energy and youth… It was well documented that he lost most of his fortune gambling with his twins. It kind of plays out almost like a Greek tragedy, but yet he kind of did it his way.

It’s interesting because… PBS is such a brilliant station with an incredible pedigree of shows that they purchase from the UK and put on their station. And the Downton Abbey‘s of the world, they’re co-owned by NBC Universal that has deep pockets. Mr. Selfridge has no help whatsoever. iTV did such a brilliant job. The show was purchased by PBS and put on the air without any advertising, so I went from this HBO juggernaut to this beautiful “ma and pa” organization. It was very interesting. The show being a hit overseas and then having it kind of make its way in a very kind of sweet under the radar way in my own country. Does that make any sense?

ADTV: Absolutely. It’s definitely one of those “word of mouth” building shows.

JP: Exactly.

ADTV: Tell me what kinds of acting cues did you use to define the character of Harry Selfridge for yourself?

JP: Well, he was enamored with P.T. Barnum, and, if you look at everything he did, he was always taking a page out of P.T. Barnum’s book. He would create events that caught people’s attention, and, ironically, he depended on advertising that he bought himself to gain the success of the store. He would purchase full-page ads in the paper advertising Selfridge’s when no one else was doing that. He was there every morning at 9am on the dot to greet all the customers, and he really believed that they should all be treated decently and as his guests. I’ve spoken to my mother about this, and she remembers as a child going into Marshall Fields and being treated so well as a child. That was part of Harry Selfridge’s doing. He wanted to make it an event that was special. It meant the world to him. So, that’s part of the perspective that I incorporated into the character. The showman aspect of Harry Selfridge was eventually beaten out of him.

That’s what I really love about doing a series – you get to explore the trajectory of the show, the character, and all of that stuff. He was a guy who loved his wife but wasn’t faithful, ran around, and then came to terms with how important she was in his life. When he finally got that and was totally present, she became ill and died. So, he then threw himself into another relationship, and she ended up being a charlatan. Took him for his money, and he kind of was beaten down. You see these layers being stripped off the guy through the journey of the show. The show works when you see all four seasons. It plays out like a heightened version of a mini-series spread out over 40 episodes, but it definitely has a beginning, a middle, and an end. It can exist on its own. That’s the way they envisioned it over four season, and that’s the way it played out.

I know I’m too old for graduate school, but it still felt like it to me. – Jeremy Piven on working in Masterpiece’s Mr. Selfridge

ADTV: In the final episode during the 20th anniversary celebration, Selfridge thanks his staff for their dedication as he leaves the store. The emotion in that scene feels startlingly real. Was the scene filmed at the end of your shoot? Was that real emotion at play in you?

JP: We were filming that at the end of the run. It’s interesting because the Brits really like to incorporate the thing about the stiff upper lip. Sometimes, there’s a hesitation to engage in male emotions, if that makes any sense. Harry was an American, and he was incredibly proud of that store and the store was his life. What people don’t know is the reason he went to London was that he didn’t want to compete against his mentor Marshall Fields in Chicago. That’s why he got on the boat… and started over there. He did it, and what a great accomplishment it was. And then it was taken away from him by his board and by his son! And that’s true!

As an actor, you hope to be as present as possible. That’s your wish. That was that moment. He’s looking around at all this staff that he loves… he took great pride in that and treated everyone on an equal playing field… So, he’s looking around at all of these people, and all you have to do is just put yourself there in that place. The emotion is a result of that. If you juxtapose his emotion with the British stiff upper lip, then that’s kind of what the show is about and what the journey was and who he was. He was an American navigating over there. He loved the culture. They loved his energy, and, having been over there myself for four years, I loved it. I learned so much. I loved played him.

ADTV: You’ve won three consecutive Emmys for Entourage, and there’s conversation about your performance in Mr. Selfridge. How would recognition for this series register differently with you?

JP: This is one of the great things about being an actor. No two days are ever the same on a set. Obviously no two endeavors are ever the same. Filming over there in London, the entire experience was very much like Harry’s experience. I was the lone American, trying to navigate through this. I’m really proud of the time that I had there. I know I’m too old for graduate school, but it still felt like it to me. I think it would be great because I’m just so proud of these other actors that I played with. They deserve recognition and were so good. Every single one. They all had this specific intention whenever they played a scene, and it was a gift to be around. It would mean a lot to me to draw attention to their work and to the show.

ADTV: What’s the next big challenge for Jeremy Piven?

JP: I’m working on something myself, an idea that I’ve been wrestling with for a while, and I just want to be a bigger part of the process. I want to create something here and see where it goes. It’s too early to discuss it until it comes to fruition though, but I figured I’d give it a shot. Why not?

Jeremy Piven and Masterpiece’s Mr. Selfridge can be seen on iTunes and Amazon.

Oscar-Winning Director Susanne Bier On Her Fluent Transition To TV

Susanne Bier talks to AwardsDaily TV about ‘The Night Manager.’

I connected with director Susanne Bier in her home land of Denmark to discuss the gripping American-British TV production The Night Manager. It’s yet another successful John le Carre adaptation – this time airing on AMC – for which she directed all six episodes. It’s also her debut TV outing, I might add.

An avid advocate of women filmmakers and a true fan of her work, I tried to contain my excitement with Susanne and remained professional enough to delve into her experiences in film, TV, the processes of directing and telling a story, as well as touching on the Dogme film movement in Denmark.

AwardsDaily TV: Hello, Susanne Bier. Wow, you’re speaking to a massive fan, genuinely, which you’ll see shortly. I fought to get you from the AwardsDaily TV staff.

Susanne Bier: [Laughs] Hello.

ADTV: So let me just start with the football. Will you be following the European Championships even without Denmark?

SB: [Laughs] I will follow it second hand. That year Denmark won the European cup…

ADTV: Ah yes, ’92 I believe.

SB: Yes, that’s right.

ADTV: My wife is Greek, and they’re not in it anyway. so… On with the entertainment questions. I know you studied art and architecture once upon a time – which direction were you looking at going back then?

susanne_bier_03
Photo courtesy of Les Kaner

SB: You know, I think I did want to be an architect at one point, then I started being more and more interested in the people who would inhabit the buildings I was supposed to design. It was a kind of gradual, quite organic transition for me. I trained in architecture, in blueprints, in a view of the whole thing, and all of that has helped me greatly in movies and television.

ADTV: We obviously have to talk about the Oscar-winning film In a Better World. On my own website I ran the 100 Films Made by Women series, and I wrote about it passionately. It is a great film. I described it as packing an enduring punch to both the gut and the heart. That you proved yourself on a par with the male contingent of filmmakers, crafting one of the finest films of the last decade. That was without doubt for me.

SB: You know, however, the female thing is truly important for me. I see myself as a director. I do see myself as a female director – a director. I am just happy doing the traditional things I am doing.

ADTV: Also, I run an annual film honors list and in 2010 you were named Best Director by me. So congratulations on that too.

SB: Oh good.

ADTV: It was close. I mean we had films like Inception and The Social Network – a good year for film.

SB: Oh I am glad. Thank you.

ADTV: I am going to touch on the Dogme Danish film wave. What was your relationship with this movement? Did it encourage you? Did you bounce away from it?

SB: It was a really strong movement. It did push European film back on the map. At that point when Dogme started there was a type of European film, like independents or like American big budget film, those films were sitting comfortable, but not telling a proper story. What Dogme did, it had a kind of austerity, the whole sort of a lot of what is tradition movie making, you are not allowed to do. The characters are the story-line. It did actually bring films back into a shape that was interesting, because suddenly we had writers, directors, focusing on storytelling. It was incredible for all of us, an educational experiment, because it was true storytelling. It was quite a long time ago, but since then I have enjoyed the film-making, all the things you can do with film. There was no doubt it was inspirational, and incredibly exciting.

ADTV: Did you have any kind of relationship with the likes of Lars von Trier or Thomas Vinterberg and another woman director, I saw Italian for Beginners…

SB: …Lone Scherfig. We all went to the same film school. We all have the same educational history, and we all knew each other.

ADTV: You still speak to any of those now?

SB: I do. I was kind of the second generation of Dogme, and the first generation probably had more to do with one another – but there is definitely communication, yes.

ADTV: So, The Night Manager, then. Which I have just watched with the wife. This is your first TV adventure, right?

SB: Yes, yes.

ADTV: John Le Carre, the author, if you don’t know who he is here in the UK, and what he has done, you must be from Mars.

SB: [Laughs] Yes, you must be from another world.

ADTV: How familiar are you with his work?

SB: I have always been a great admirer of his, always loved him. His stories have a clear thriller [plot] and a lot of psychology, the characters are interesting, flawed, and sort of complicated. I have always been secretly envious of anyone who got to touch his novels. So when I heard there was a project around I really wanted to do it.

ADTV: So it that how did you land this great TV project? Did you chase it? Was it on offer?

SB: I sort of chased it. They weren’t terribly resistant. I guess because I had not done television before, they were quite open to my suggestions and point of view.

ADTV: So is TV something you wanted to do, or was it that it just happened to be a TV project?

SB: I did want to do TV. I was searching for TV. I have enjoyed a lot of TV myself over the last few years. I found the writing, so much great writing on TV, and I was keen to do a big project. There was something interesting and challenging for me to do six hours as opposed to two hours and having a complicated story-line. And shoot it like a six hour film… It was shot randomly, as opposed to by episode, so it was incredibly exciting.

ADTV: I’ve seen The Night Manager – a really solid drama, hard to fault. Finely directed and acted. What a super-talented cast that was, all of them. I know it is a cliche, but I am a big fan of those main actors. There’s three that everyone knows [Hugh Laure; Tom Hiddlestone; Olivia Colman]. They were all brilliant. I mean, that must be a dream come true for you, right?

SB: Yes, it was a dream come true. It was the kind of project were everything fits together, the casting was very exciting and intriguing. We did change some of the source material, the character of [Angela] Burr, who is a woman, in the novel that’s a man. And we did, in the update of the piece, one of the things we wanted to do was take it out of the white, male, public school world. And Burr’s office was a slightly diverse group of people, it was so joyful. Th update of the novel is very timely, dealing with illegal weapons is not prevalent in Britain, and because of that it came to a shape naturally.

ADTV: Even early on I felt it echoed the tone of In a Better World – the location, the tight drama. That’s a testament to you and your talent. Is there a specific directing process, or technical trait, that follows you with each project?

SB: You know, its funny you say that, there is. I did shoot it the way I normally shoot. I guess I am a director who very much, like every morning, it is about what is the main focus of that scene, where is that exact point where everything turns. So I keep asking those questions and rehearse them with the actors and work it around those questions. And that procedure enables the process to not lose intensity at any point, and there is a danger of that with six hours of material – that some stuff could be bleaker than others. But we keep it alive with constant questions, searching for the right thing so it does not lose intensity.

ADTV: I suppose it is like making three back-to-back films. It is the stamina isn’t it? Like can you maintain that for six hours, not just one hour forty-five or two hours?

SB: Yeah, its stamina. Also exiting with stamina comes way more natural kind of… invigoration. It’s hard work, and you don’t do anything else. I sleep at night and work. It is thrilling work.

ADTV: I know you tend to cover themes of family, human relationships, a certain amount of suffering, redemption as well. Those are some of your common themes. Did The Night Manager allow you to incorporate your style relatively easily? That type of story.

SB: Easily, easily. There is a very  strong family theme and certainly a revenge, redemption theme, which is very strong. The great news is I don’t try consciously to push into things I am doing. These themes were already in the novel. They are quite often in way broader films, even in some of the great action films, things I am more obsessed about that many other directors.

Photo courtesy of Des Willie /The Ink Factory/AMC
Photo courtesy of Des Willie /The Ink Factory/AMC

ADTV: Are you going to continue making films or TV in your creative terms and not, how can I put it, pander to the industry? I have seen people ask you about women directors – that [Hollywood] has to do this now and hire female crew. Maybe that is not for you. You just want direct or don’t want to follow what Hollywood or whoever else tells you to do.

SB: I would be happy to do a big action film. I think it is making the differentiation. I have always felt there is a little bit of a snobbish, arrogance, to what American movies have been, which is a misunderstanding. To me a great story is a great story. I don’t really care what the setting is. I want to do great work. If it is an action film it takes great action but also great story-lines, making those scenes work. The sort of  sort of arrogance about the commercialism. I find it a bit silly actually. Really, a great film is a great film, it does not matter if it is American, Russian, or French, I don’t really care. And I want to watch it, or make it.

ADTV: Well, it would be interesting to see your version of Spider-Man, for example.

SB: I’d be interested in that as well. [Laughs]

ADTV: That would have family and suffering in there, but I guess most super hero films have that.

SB: That’s my point. It’s almost like, when you look at those films, they need a very distinct story-line, for my taste, to work. Then all the fun comes on top of that.

ADTV: I could talk to you for hours and ask you a thousand different questions. But one last question, what is next for you? Back to film? Looking for more TV? Or both? In America, UK? Back in Denmark?

SB: I have not decided what the next thing will be. It is not that long since I finished The Night Manager. I will be excited to start the next thing.

ADTV: I will certainly keep my eye out. I could talk to you for much longer, so thank you very much indeed.

SB: Thank you, take care.

FYC: Jane Fonda and Lily Tomlin in ‘Grace and Frankie’

Jazz Tangcay makes a plea for Emmy to consider both Jane Fonda and Lily Tomlin for their superb comedy work in Netflix’s Grace and Frankie.

Last year, Emmy recognized Netflix’s Grace and Frankie with one nomination for Lily Tomlin in Lead Comedy Actress. However, this season the Television Academy should be honoring it with far more. Comedy is quite a cramped category with Veep, Transparent, Silicon Valley and Modern Family predicted to receive multiple nominations.  In the Lead Comedy Actress category, it’s equally as crowded. However, the Television Academy should make room for veterans and Hollywood royalty, Jane Fonda and Lily Tomlin.

Tomlin is almost certain to be nominated, but what about Fonda? Both were stellar this season. Let’s be honest, we’d love to see both actresses receive a nod because can you imagine Grace without Frankie or vice versa? There’s an episode this season where Grace gets to meet some friends from days gone by, and by the end, she realizes how much her friendship with Frankie means.

Estelle Parsons, another veteran made an appearance this season. Her character plays Babe, Grace and Frankie’s neighbor who confesses she has terminal cancer and wants Grace and Frankie to throw the mother of all parties. Despite the subject matter, Parsons gave an outstanding performance, standing toe to toe with Fonda and Tomlin in delivering sassy one-liners and excelled in her episodes.  If anything, the Television Academy should reward her with a nomination for Best Guest Actress in a Comedy.

Comedy featuring female duos is at a high this season with plenty to offer from shows such as Broad City and Playing House. Then there’s Grace and Frankie, now in its second season and currently shooting its third season. In case you’ve not seen it, Jane Fonda and Lily Tomlin are back on the small screen together in Grace and Frankie. Brought to you by Marta Kauffman (Friends), the show follows two 70-year-old divorcees whose gay ex-husbands leave them for each other.

Season one spent much of the time developing this complex relationship between Grace (Fonda) and Frankie (Tomlin) as they dealt with the post-divorce fallout. Season two gives us more of the friendship between the superior actresses. They’re together. They’re besties.

Frankly, there’s nothing more rewarding than watching both Jane Fonda and Lily Tomlin interact both on and off-screen. Watch this moment at a recent NY Times Look West Event. Watch as they bounce off each other, support each other, and how Fonda helps Tomlin with her necklace. Will this moment make it into season three?

An Interview with Jane Fonda and Lily Tomlin

I recently paid a visit to Stage 24 on the Paramount lot where cast and crew are filming the third season and was able to speak to both Jane Fonda and Lily Tomlin in their beach house.

AwardsDaily TV: What’s a typical working day like for both of you?

Lily Tomlin: A lot of it is busy work. We have to get our hair done. We have to do our make-up.

Jane Fonda: We run lines a lot.

LT: We run lines.

JF: Endlessly.

LT: She’s looking at dailies on her iPad. What am I doing? I’m not doing anything. I’m staring at the wall.

JF: I tell you what, neither one of us is reading a heavy book. Sam’s the only one that brings a book.

LT: Sam’s addicted to that Montaigne or whoever.

JF: I have a book with me at all times, but I’ve never read a book since we started.

LT: I have a book with me at all times, and I’ve never read it.

JF: [laughs]

ADTV: I think we all have that book just in case.

JF: Just in case.

ADTV: Was it as if no time had passed since 1980 when you did 9 to 5?

JF: I feel like it was a different lifetime. I feel like a different person.

LT: I feel like no time has passed. In terms of the real concept of time, there is no time.

JF: Cosmically.

LT: I was in my costume room the other day, and I saw several objects. It was silly things like a doll or a lamb that a friend had given me years ago. I quickly put two stuffed animals together so they could be friendly. [laughs].

JF: [Laughs] Did you really?

LT: Yes. I feel so goofy. I said, “Oh Lambie.” There was a little bear, and I put him next to the shelf so they could sit next to each other.

JF: You know what I found in storage the other day?

LT: What?

JF: A box of the rat poison. It’s the prop of the poison that she accidentally puts into the coffee.

LT: Oh, that’s going to be worth a fortune.

JF: My favorite line in the film is her line, “I killed the boss, you think they’re not going to fire me for that?”

LT: The boss was pretty great. We loved our boss. That Dabney Coleman.

JF: It does seem like a long time ago, that we did 9 to 5.

LT: It does. If you only had complete recall like Marilu Henner. You had to remember all those days, one after another. What you were wearing. Who you ate with. What you ate. It would just be mind-boggling.

JF: What does she have to do with it?

LT: She’s got that memory that she remembers the day she met you. She remembers every day isolated in her whole history. It would be great. Important days you do remember. I remember when you came backstage at the Ahmanson Theatre. You had a cape on. You were very glamorous and down to earth.

JF: Oh my gosh, I remember epiphanies. I have a good memory for those. So much has happened since 9 to 5. Wonderful and important things for me. Like On Golden Pond, and other life altering things.

ADTV: What’s it like being one of the few shows that represents women of your age on TV?

JF: It feels very good because older women are the fastest growing demographic globally. We live longer. There’s more of us in the world. It’s great to be doing a show that speaks to older women. But, it also speaks to young girls and that’s what’s so interesting. We didn’t expect that.

LT: It seems like so many young people really love the show. They stop me everywhere. They write on her blog.

ADTV: Lily, you talked about costumes earlier. Where does Frankie get her clothes from?

LT: There is a place by my house called Layers, and you really just find different items. Someone actually wrote to me telling me they had dressed up as Frankie for Halloween.

JF: [laughs]

LT: People like the look of Frankie… that’s part of her character.

JF: People write to me all the time asking where does she get her clothes and jewelry.

LT: People send us jewelry and contribute it.

ADTV: How has season two compared to season one?

LT: Season two starts out in that first episode where we’re plucking the hair out of each other. I say, “I’m going to be a new Frankie.I’m going to see what my life is like without Sol.” I think we were seeing what’s going to become of us. After we got over the shock of the separation, the second season dealt with us coming to terms with the fact that we were separate and alone.

JF : I think at the very end of season one, Grace began to realize that with all her oddities that Frankie has a gift that Grace needs. It’s a gift of openness, forgiveness, and flexibility. We come into season two ready to become friends, and we do. We end up in business together.

LT: [laughs] We could have done that in one episode.

ADTV: What lies ahead?

JF: Marta Kaufman sees the arc of season three as exploring their vulnerability.

LT: For everybody in the show really. They’re all coming to terms with their vulnerability, their weaknesses. Everyone is calling everyone on what they’ve put up with for years and how that needs to maybe looked at.

ADTV: How does the show continue to challenge you both as actresses?

JF: I just find it challenging to find the right line between comedy and drama. It’s challenging. I don’t want ot phone it in.

LT: We have to work at it every day. We’re doing it in thirty minutes, and we cover alot of ground. As Jane said, you have to bring a reality to it, and yet you have to have a light enough touch in that the comedy isn’t overwhelmed.

Grace and Frankie is now streaming on Netflix

https://youtu.be/rAcRVxj7h5I

FYC: Andrew Rannells in ‘Girls’

Joey Moser recommends the Television Academy consider Andrew Rannells for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series

I mean no disrespect towards Adam Driver, but he needs to step aside. He’s been Emmy nominated for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series for the last three consecutive years even when the show’s Emmy luster has waned. Of course, Driver is not responsible for his continued nomination success, and he’s such a great performer on the show. I only ask him to take a step back and let Girls‘ fifth season supporting actor standout have a real chance to be recognized for his work. Andrew Rannells deserves serious Emmy consideration for his brilliant season five character arc as Elijah.

Elijah has always been more of a funny supporting character on Lena Dunham’s comedy. He would pal around with Hannah as much as he would bring her back to reality. Rannells’ presence on the show has always been welcome, but I’ve personally felt that we never got enough of his Elijah. With his winning wit and willingness to tell anyone the truth, Elijah was always one of the more reliably fun characters in HBO’s lineup. What was missing was a more dramatic storyline, and he received one in this last batch of episodes.

Rannells’ Elijah was given a true love interest for the first time in Girls’ entire five seasons. We’ve seen him with boys or make comments about other men, but he fell head over cautious heels for a prominent news anchor, played by Corey Stoll. Stoll’s Dill Harcourt (what an awesome name, by the way) surprises Elijah as they casually begin dating. It’s a sort of a Manhattan fairytale, feeling like something Carrie Bradshaw would romanticize over. We’ve never seen Elijah’s defenses so down, and the feeling radiates from Rannells’ smile. They even kiss in the middle of Times Square as the camera swirls around them. If this isn’t a romantic comedy dream, I don’t know what is!

Andrew Rannells
Photo courtesy of HBO.

Rannells’ best moments come in the next to last episode, “Love Stories.” Elijah goes to Dill’s station to apologize to him for how they left an argument, but he ultimately wants to put everything on the table. He explains that all the other boys will want to just be in Dill’s life for his fame and what he could give them. Elijah insists that Dill won’t get that from him, and, at that moment, Elijah is smiling broader than he’s ever allowed us to witness (and that’s saying something considering Rannells’ big, adorable grin).

A breakup is always great acting fodder, but Rannells’ breaks our hearts with one simple widening of his eyes. As Dill explains that he is looking “for someone special,” Elijah realizes that his plea to mend their problems is being met with a premature end. As they meet for a tearful goodbye, we are left to wonder if this will make Elijah more guarded towards love. His openness and interest in building a relationship is one of the most interesting things that Dunham has ever allowed his character do on Girls. Elijah’s experience with Dill will change him.

Here’s hoping that Girls makes a strong showing at this year’s Emmy Awards. Everything from the performances to the writing to the direction excelled in season five. I’m in Andrew Rannells’ corner because we’ve all had our heart broken. His face registers the blistering pain of your world crashing around you in a single instant.

Nominate him.

Ann Dowd On Letting Go in ‘The Leftovers’

ADTV talks to award-winning actress Ann Dowd about her character’s journey in The Leftovers

Any nerves of excitement or apprehension I may have before diving into an interview with great actors, writers, or directors soon vanishes when you speak to someone so warm, and humble as award-winning actress Ann Dowd. Our pleasant conversation started with discussing our respective children, showing an encouraging enthusiasm for my little newcomers, and wishing me luck with them. And then I got to ask her about her terrific body of work on TV, film, and in the theater.

Dowd’s scene-stealing role as Patti Levin in HBO’s The Leftovers was a delight to watch, even in her most sinister moments. In season two, Patti makes an unimaginable evolution, filling the screen with the elusive partnership she shared with co-star Justin Theroux. The grounded, grateful actress behind Patti Levin is still learning, simply happy to be here, and enjoying the challenges of her work. This would be a walk in the park.

AwardsDaily TV: So, Ann Dowd, what would you say are the best things you’ve seen on TV and film this year so far? Anything you are watching?

Ann Dowd: I have three children and don’t watch very much. A little here and a little there. Trying to catch up on a few things, there is so much that is good. My children like The Golden Girls. My 11-year-old son is a fan of The Leftovers, but he only watches five minutes then can’t watch it. [Laughs]

ADTV: What are your earliest memories and aspirations about being an actress?

AD: I loved it in high school, doing plays, and loved thinking that I could not do this for a living – you don’t get to do the things you love. I went to college, and I was pre-med and had been doing plays in school. Also my organic chemistry teacher said to me, “This is great, but is it what you love?” I said “Well, not as much as acting.” She answered with “Well, that is the direction to go in.” And so I had some real encouragement. So instead of medical school, I auditioned for a conservatory and never looked back basically.

Ann DowdADTV: You have a pretty heft theater background.

AD: Yes, fortunately.

ADTV: I know you played Sister Aloysius in Doubt on the stage. No offense to that “nobody” Meryl Streep, but would you have liked to have done the film?

AD: Well, you know I would love to have done the film. And who better than Meryl Streep. I think you have to have been raised in catholic school, it really helps. I have two aunts who are catholic nuns. [Sister Aloysius] is not mean like she is in the film. She is duty bound and feels that is her job, follows a very righteous path. To her it is all about doing what is right and what is expected of you, doing your job without complaint – that I thought was an important distinction. The thing is, who am I? The playwright directed it. He must have felt pretty good about it.

ADTV: Yes, but you don’t know what happens in between theater and studios making it a certain way for film.

AD: That’s true. Playing that part was one of the finest experiences I have ever had. She was a stranger to me. She is a loner, given her choice she would have gone in the garden or served to the poor.

ADTV: What are you passionate about outside of your vast acting work? Anything you are particularly proud of?

AD: I live in New York you see. Space is limited. I have a balcony and have flowers there. I love to paint the walls of my apartment on any given day. A bit of a joke with my family. [Laughs] That is a passion of mine, to change everything as often as I can.

ADTV: Sounds like my mother. When we were kids, decorating every room in the house, then going back and starting again.

AD: [Laughs] That is adorable. That is funny.

ADTV: Impressively, you’ve been in films during a time when I was really getting into films, like Green Card and Lorenzo’s Oil.

AD: Oh my gosh. My first film, Green Card.

ADTV: A lovely film.

AD: Yes, lovely film. And Peter Weir, phenomenal. It was extremely nerve-racking, I was thinking, let me do it right today somehow. A wonderful experience, many years ago.

ADTV: Plus you’ve worked with directors like Jonathan Demme, Steven Soderbergh, and Clint Eastwood. What stands out for you from your film work?

AD: Well, Compliance changed so much for me in terms of being accessible. I don’t know if you saw Compliance.

ADTV: Oh I did.

AD: It was shot in fourteen, fifteen days, on a very low budget. I love the director Craig Zobel, and he was involved in The Leftovers as well (director). I remember thinking, every now and then when a role just clicks, and we count on that, using our skill to connect with a character. [Compliance‘s Sandra] made perfect sense to me, her choices. I found her very clear and got it. If you are raised in a religious home, as I was, full of love, etcetera, you defer to the church. You defer to authority. And if you are built with a constitution that doesn’t know how to say, “Excuse me, what?” I don’t like that. You don’t have that in this character. You put a few elements together, parts of life, and you have Compliance. It was a role I loved.

ADTV: So you went to the Sundance Film Festival with Compliance.

AD: Yes. A fascinating experience, my first. We were sitting in the premiere, a nice big room, packed. Sundance I find to be an alternate universe if ever I saw one. I watched the film, and I don’t tend to watch the things I do. Often the experience of doing it is so strange while you’re watching, it changes everything. I watched Compliance on my computer and now on a big screen. A bit of time had gone by, and I was so intrigued by it. As the film was coming to a end, a man was screaming at the back, just criticizing the film, and really screaming. And everybody was joining in. It triggered so many people. It was unbelievable.

ADTV: I didn’t know that happened.

AD: Yeah. You realize how it affects people. You do a lot of things that don’t see the light of day and that can have an impact on people, which I love.

ADTV: Yeah, I think some people don’t realize that [the disturbing events in the film] actually happened. The film is very short, but it is the equivalent of someone scraping their fingernails down a blackboard. It is awful to experience, but you have to anyway.

AD: Yeah. There was a woman in the screening who was going to walk out, but said “I have a granddaughter and want to educate her.”

ADTV: Yeah. It says at the end of the film that this happens to so many Americans.

AD: That’s right.

ADTV: There was no Oscar nomination for that. I know you were in the running, but a film like that can fall at the last hurdle, which is a shame as it was a perfect supporting role. I think you should have gotten in.

AD: Oh thank you, I appreciate that so much. I have not really been in that arena, in that situation where there is a thought of any nomination of any kind, as all of a sudden you want it, but you keep focused on the work. It took me a fair amount of time to say, “You know awards are wonderful, and I am grateful to be honored, but you must keep your feet on the ground.”

Ann Dowd
Van Redin/HBO

ADTV: Let’s talk about The Leftovers then. The second season was more of a success because I think not many saw the first season, which was also very good. Then at the Critics Choice Awards, you and Regina King were nominated and Carrie Coon won. That was great for the show.

AD: Yeah, that was a thrill. My family watches, and they love it. My brother John can’t make heads or tails of it. He was looking for something more linear. You go here then you go there, a natural progression of story. That is not what we have here, to our great delight. The first season was fascinating to do because putting it together and not knowing what the Guilty Remnant was and their beliefs. Then in the second season Patti is in a different place. People asked me what it was like to not speak. Quite daunting, as I rely on words. We all do. I had to learn what she wants and just get it and not use words. It was a very powerful experience, an extraordinary position to take. Damon [Lindelof] and Tom Perrotta know her so well. The whole group was so phenomenal.

ADTV: Yeah, a really great cast. The stuff with you and Justin [Theroux] was so good.

AD: He described it later as a kind of love story with just those two in the scenes. They were drawn to one another. They achieved something, which was intimacy. Justin understands the shape of a scene when you are playing the scene he is right there – it is a very safe place. As the material is daunting. Everyone had to be on their game, the writer, directors, actors, costumes, make up, hair.

ADTV: Do you empathize or support the Guilty Remnant’s plight? Did you get on board with it? Why they were like that?

AD: It is a terrific question. When I first read the material I remember thinking, “Well what is this now? What is going on here?” This show has taught me so much. I am a kind of kitchen sink actress with everything in front of me, but, hello, that is not what we are doing here. I found her very intriguing, and by episode three I am all in. Then I find out as I am fully attached to the show that my character is going to die. Damon gracefully wrote me an email, and I was heartbroken that I was now going away. When I started to realize what they were preaching – to let go the attachment – I didn’t know I could ever do that. What it did teach me to do was just let go. Do the work, enjoy the work as it is happening, but let go. A miraculous experience that whole thing. I remember asking Damon what does it matter that he kills her? What does that mean? He is always clear when you ask him. He said it is a new religion and are putting it together for the first time.

I had such empathy for the Guilty Remnant and that whole experience. You can come home to your family, have dinner together, go to work, pay your rent. Life offers its own kind of suffering – your children grow up and stop nursing. We wave goodbye. That is a privileged sadness. The Leftovers throws in from the start a catastrophe. And watching people trying to put their lives back, to get to get some semblance of grief, it made me think of my own life, and if such a thing were to happen, how it would change you. So I connected to their way of seeing the world.

Ann Dowd
Van Redin/HBO

ADTV: It must have been nice to get that email to say your character is going to die, but now you get some lines.

AD: [Laughs] Oh yes, you have something to say. They wrote it like a play.

ADTV: Season two was great, and you were fantastic. Patti’s haunting of Kevin was extraordinary – you were outstanding by the way. Chilling, funny, and then sympathetic. At the end it was a little bit like hero and villain falling in love. The well scene is very sad.

AD: Yes. We were talking about this, watching that little girl, and the things they made her say. When you realize you have the privilege of spending time with a character, and having time with her and then realizing it is time for her to go. She was in his life and did not know why, then able to say out loud how she failed in her life. I could not get over the writing, that well scene, that is a long day ahead sitting in a well. [Laughs] That was the day I realized Patti is going to die. Anyway, it was emotional. And thank god for Justin.

ADTV: He has worked with David Lynch so he is used to weird.

AD: [Laughs] Right, yes.

ADTV: Well, good luck with everything, the Emmys, the show’s reception, and just keep doing what you are doing. It is a pleasure.

AD: Thank you. And good luck to you with your children.

HBO has renewed The Leftovers for a third and final season of eight episodes which began principal shooting in May 2016.

Ann Dowd
Van Redin/HBO

Kenneth Branagh on the End of Masterpiece’s ‘Wallander’

Kenneth Branagh talks to AwardsDaily TV about the complexity of Masterpiece’s Wallander and about finding the truth in portraying Alzheimer’s.

There aren’t enough hours in the day to talk to someone like Kenneth Branagh.

For those uninitiated in the world of talent interviews, you’re normally allotted around twenty minutes of their time. Sometimes you luck out, and you can talk that into 30 minutes. Sometimes more. Such was not the case with the extraordinarily talented – and extraordinarily busy – Kenneth Branagh. Talking with Kenneth Branagh is akin to taking a master class in acting theory. The man is so rich, so full of tremendous insight into the craft of acting, that asking questions feels a bit like being in said class when you didn’t read the text the night before.

Still, Kenneth Branagh (or “Ken” as he graciously asked me to call him) is an incredibly kind and professional person, extremely approachable despite his award-filled pedigree. His latest project, the final series of  PBS’s Masterpiece presentation of Wallander which was based on the celebrated Swedish crime novels by Henning Mankell, is an engaging and intense journey into neo noir. Ranging in locales from sunny South Africa to the hazy grey of Sweden, Wallander is, at its heart, a brilliant character study of a man growing and changing as life continues to hand him difficult circumstances. Based on the final Wallander novel, The Troubled Man, which aired late May on PBS’s Masterpiece, sees Kenneth Branagh as title character Kurt Wallander struggle with the onset of dementia and Alzheimer’s. Needless to say, it’s a powerful and honest portrayal of someone suffering from the disease. It never falters or becomes melodramatic. Branagh’s turn feels real and true. I should know. My grandmother died from the disease.

Kenneth “Ken” Branagh talked to me about the challenge of finding the truth in Wallander’s circumstance and the overall acting choices he made to bring this celebrated character to the small screen one final time.  He received an Emmy nomination for the role once before in 2009. Here’s hoping Emmy voters look beyond the noise of the awards season to embrace this quietly devastating series and Kenneth Branagh’s stellar work in it.

AwardsDaily TV: Kenneth Branagh, it’s an honor to speak with you today. I can’t tell you how surreal this is. I grew up watching your films. Dead Again was probably the first time I truly realized what cinema could really do.

Kenneth Branagh: Oh that’s so nice to hear. It’s a favorite film of mine actually because it was such a great experience to work with Scott Frank and on an unusual script… We got tucked away in little corner of Paramount as it were, and it was somehow like an underground studio. We somehow got away with it. I have very fond memories of the making of it and of the film itself.

Kenneth Branagh
(C) Steffan Hill/Left Bank Pictures (Television)/Yellow Bird 2015 for MASTERPIECE
ADTV: Excellent. Let’s jump into Wallander. You’ve previously said that playing Kurt Wallander put you in a “permanent state of anxiety.” Is that still true with the fourth series?

KB: I think that I try to – you have to as best you can – to leave things at the office. It was particularly true of exploring this notion of dementia and Alzheimer’s which [Henning] Mankell describes in the book. The nature of acting requires finding this sort of state of openness to what the character requires in turn, and yet not being so married to it or carrying so much away from it that you are sort of undermined as a human being because that’s ultimately not helpful to you. It’s certainly not helpful to the art that you’re trying to produce, but it’s not always easy, especially with intense subject matter that is about what being a human is like. That’s what you are, so you are the raw material. It’s a very interesting thing to contend with because you’re aiming for truth, but you have to function as a human being and yet you cannot be too dryly technical otherwise the audience somehow intuits this. They understand it. They know when your’e being a phony. So, you’ve got to find a way to get on with the doing of it. Wallander has always been like that for me. In the fourth season, I got better at walking away from the scene or the take or the day and into just being who I was and not carrying Kurt’s burdens.

ADTV: I can imagine you’d have to. Looking at season four, there’s a certain melancholy or depression that seems to hang over Wallander through the season. What keeps Kurt Wallander pushing forward?

KB: Well, in a way, it’s his newly discovered passion for his family, for his granddaughter. Across the previous nine films, the challenges of those relationships functioning were always difficult whether it was the impact of his divorce on the relationship with his daughter or the permanent effect of the work on his relationships generally. What I find poignant about that last season is that Mankell has him with the awareness of his diabetes attempting to be – in Wallander terms – fitter and better, more nutritionally aware. Actually exercising. Actually shaving. Actually taking more notice of things and seeing their impact as well.

Generally, what keeps him going in this instance is family and particularly the enjoyment of that cross-generational thing with his granddaughter. A lot of grandparents note this special bond that they have when they don’t have the direct responsibility but they’re at a stage in their life when they really appreciate the playfulness of that young person. I suppose he sees this tremendous potential, and he sees in a way a symbol of why he does what he does which is to try and protect and preserve the world for the life and livelihood of his granddaughter.

Suddenly, the kinds of questions the asks in the first film of the last season – Do we make a difference? – are in part answered by, well, yes because we make a difference to the lives of five, six, seven year old kids who have their whole lives in front of them. That is a driving factor. Also, I think he welcomes Clara’s [his granddaughter’s] curiosity, and her sense of fun. His relationship with her is so much simpler. In a way, he sees in that connection with a younger generation, I suppose, a way to have a simpler life away from his work and away from, as you say, his melancholy that comes with the preoccupation with violent crime.

ADTV: Watching Wallander season four, I’m struck by how quiet and contemplative your performance is. Of course, Wallander, due to the nature of his job, is constantly observing. What are you playing internally as you navigate a scene?

KB: I think that my observation of policemen and women, particularly in Sweden, is that they are highly observant, highly attuned, and sensitive individuals – people who listen well – and who are reading not only for signs of practical evidence of the forensic kind… but who are looking for and attempting to interpret these behavioral signs in individuals that can often be the key to understanding the guilty that the perpetrator of a crime might have. The psychological read on people is key, and in order to do that the capacity to be entirely in the moment and sort of neutral, allowing someone who you may be suspicious of as a criminal to reveal themselves.

As an actor, it seemed to me a great way to try and be as utterly present in the scene with the other actor as possible and in the situation. Of course, we try and do this all the time, but the seemingly naked requirement of it in this is a particular quality that Wallander has. He’s often vulnerable and apparently opaque, and I think this allows people to either ignore him or say things to him they might not to other people because he isn’t pushing a particular behavioral tic. He’s not trying to over impress them with his personality. He’s often leaving silences in which that person may either implicate themselves or they simply may reveal an emotional depth that wouldn’t be possible without that particular gaze and his listening.

The requirement as an actor was this very difficult thing to do which is to be try and be simple and be right there in the moment of connection with that other character. I found this completely fascinating because you keep having to try and stop acting and doing and try to provide as much being as possible. Ultimately, you want all of that. The result that you’re after is unaffected, simple truth, but technically and imaginatively it’s an elusive place to find. Kurt Wallander as a character makes you pursue it and attempt to find it as an actor.

ADTV: The final chapter of series four – The Troubled Man – shows Wallander confirming a diagnosis of dementia or Alzheimer’s. Knowing that the series would reach this point, did that diagnosis inform your overall series four performance?

KB: Yeah, it did. I found that Wallander audiences are so attuned to the sort of micro-subtleties of what the show does. They’re very patient with the fact that the show takes its time. It’s definitely one of its characteristics. In the episode in South Africa, the beginnings of a certain kind of dizziness, a slight minor key, low-impact disorientation, start to apply themselves. Yes, Ben Caron, who directed all three of the episodes, was very helpful in trying to find ways that eagle-eyed viewers would start to, like Wallander himself, catch and question in terms of what was normal in the context of Kurt Wallander. Trying to chart that was most interesting.

With Wallander, even though his spirit some might describe as sort of heavy, the ways in which he reveals himself are very, very lightly done, so it was again trying to be as subtle and effortless as possible but still leave the viewer clues as to the beginnings of this descent into a darker place which wasn’t his normal melancholy or preoccupation or obsession. It was beginning to be the first signs of being actually lost. It was great to be able to do it and chart it across the first couple of episodes until it becomes overwhelming to him and us in the final chapter.

Kenneth Branagh
(C) Steffan Hill/Left Bank Pictures (Television)/Yellow Bird 2015 for MASTERPIECE
ADTV: Those scenes in the final chapter are very personal to me because my grandmother suffered from dementia and Alzheimer’s. How did you prepare for the dementia scenes, particularly the one in which he loses himself in the field behind his house?

KB: Well, I remember being struck many years ago by a friend of mine who told me the story of his own father who was a very together individual going missing on a local golf course and club to which he had belonged and where it had been a place that very much represented the person he was – very together, very ordered, very an in-charge alpha male kind of guy. It was at this very same golf course wandering semi-naked… his father had been found using language that he wouldn’t have normally used in any circumstances before and being violently disorientated. As this friend told me, that image stuck with me. I knew his father, and I knew what he’d been. It was very hard to imagine what he had become. I certainly saw the impact of it on my friend.

As I started to think about how that would manifest itself, I found myself talking to more than a few people who had these very direct and strong personal experiences… where people they knew and loved and who were very sort of distinct in their personalities become something very, very different. So, it seemed to me that, for Kurt – a quietly passionate man, to literally lose his way… to be so close to home and lose his way… was also going to be an echo of what David Warner [who played Wallander’s father earlier in the series] had brought to the show. Poval, [Wallander’s] father, also goes missing and is found wandering on a road and who also has difficulty connecting with Kurt. I went back to those episodes to sort of remind myself of exactly what David had done and how his loss of self manifested itself. I started to put together all these pictures and images of people who had sort of described how a parent [suffers from the disease]. The confusion puts them in an almost Tourrets-like, driven, manic phase that can be part of that same struggle.

What I did find was that there were so many different versions of how these forms of dementia might manifest themselves. To some extent, I prepared for what was on the page and to some extent played it with Jeany Spark, who played my daughter and has across these 12 films… to try and sort of have in my mind the immense frustration of being, in his case, in a very familiar place – a field behind his house – and not knowing where it was and sort of critically who he was and perhaps most profoundly and pointedly and potentially damaging for him who she was.

ADTV: At the end of The Troubled Man, Wallander has a conversation with his dead father about his failing memory. The image of his father tells him “Someone else will remember for you.” Who do you think that “someone else” is in Kurt’s life? Is that his granddaughter, Clara?

KB: Well, his daughter and his granddaughter. Like all of Wallander and all of the complex and charged world around dementia, some of the voices in his head will remember for him… The people who will remember for him are both inside and outside of his own mind, but I think that you’re right to say that Clara is potentially the key… the simplicity and directness of their relationship… and also because of that the possibility to remove, what is clearly such a factor in certain forms of dementia, to remove more of the anxiety that people have about this thing that may be engulfing them. As troubled as this troubled man is, there is a sort of compassionate possibility in his story there may be support and stimulus and a way to experience it that does not contain only darkness.

I somehow felt Kurt maybe had something more to say than that. It may be just an Irish sentimentalist speaking, but I know that it’s been an absolute privilege to play the part, to have known Henning Mankell, and to have visited and spent time in that part of Sweden and with that particular kind of man. As they say, never say never.

ADTV: Is there another Kurt Wallander performance in you?

KB: I know that way back when Henning wrote the book, he said that’s the end. I don’t know. I left wondering is there another story that are the last moments before he goes into that good night or retires into a place that is sort of further away spiritually. As I watched that last film, I felt as a viewer, which is in no way objective, I didn’t want to leave him on that beach even with his family. I somehow felt Kurt maybe had something more to say than that. It may be just an Irish sentimentalist speaking, but I know that it’s been an absolute privilege to play the part, to have known Henning Mankell, and to have visited and spent time in that part of Sweden and with that particular kind of man. As they say, never say never.

PBS’s Masterpiece presentation of Wallander, starring Kenneth Branagh, completed in late May. You can find Wallander series four on iTunes and Amazon.

Taking a Look at the Emmy Nominating Ballots

Jalal takes a look at the recently released Emmy nominating ballots and determines their potential impact on the Emmy nominees.

Every year on the day voting for Emmy nominees begins, the Television Academy makes PDF versions of the Emmy nominating ballots available on their official website. These Emmy nominating ballots show the final decisions of who will be submitted in what category, who was snubbed by their own network/show runner for a nomination, what episodes were submitted for consideration in certain categories, and what surprises might pop up on nominations morning. Looking through the nominating ballots is the perfect tool for anyone wanting to predict the Emmys since you’ll be looking through the same documents and be able to put yourself in the mind of the voter.

Looking through the 2016 Emmy nominating ballots, these are the things that stand out at first glance:

  • Funny or Die submitted their 50 minute parody video Donald Trump’s The Art of The Deal in the TV Movie race and Johnny Depp in the Lead Actor in a Limited Series/TV Movie race.
  • Aidy Bryant’s Vimeo short Darby Forever was submitted in the TV Movie race and Aidy Bryant and Retta were submitted in the Limited Series/TV Movie acting races.
  • Lady Day at Emerson’s Bar and Grill was submitted by HBO as a special class program and not as a TV movie as most were expecting.
  • The 25-hour marathon of the first season of Angie Tribeca was submitted as a Variety Special.
  • Four puppeteers (Bill Barretta, David Goelz, Eric Jacobson, and Steve Whitmire) have been submitted in the Lead Actor in a Comedy Series category for their work on The Muppets.
  • Fred Armisen and Carrie Brownstein were moved up from the supporting race to the lead race for their starring roles on Portlandia.
  • James Earl Jones and Angela Lansbury were not submitted in the Limited Series/TV Movie acting categories for their performances in the filmed stage version of Driving Miss Daisy.
  • Downton Abbey star Laura Carmichael was submitted in the Lead Drama Actress category for the first time as opposed to her usual supporting actress submission.
  • Rob James-Collier was not submitted for Downton Abbey’s final season in any category.
  • Kristen Schaal was submitted as a supporting actress for her performance in The Last Man on Earth, as opposed to her lead submission last year.
  • Amy Landecker was submitted in the supporting actress race for Transparent even though some were predicting/suggesting she go lead for season two.
  • Tina Fey and Amy Poehler were submitted as a duo in the Guest Actress in a Comedy race for their hosting gig on Saturday Night Live, making them the first pair to be nominated as a duo in an acting race.
  • Saturday Night Live did not submit Julia Louis-Dreyfus but did submit Miley Cyrus and Ariana Grande.
  • Three time nominee Diana Rigg was not submitted for her work on Game of Thrones.
  • In the show description for RuPaul’s Drag Race on the Reality Competition ballot they describe the show using a genitalia joke (we’ll have to wait and see if that woos over voters).

artofdeal

The Emmy nominating ballots are also a good indicator of which show strategized their directing and writing submissions well and which shows over-submitted and risk being snubbed.

  • The American Crime Story episode Marcia, Marcia, Marcia was submitted in the writing category but not for its directing. Instead Ryan Murphy was submitted for directing the pilot.
  • Black-ish, Crazy Ex-Girlfriend, Masters of None, Bates Motel, Mr. Robot, Downton Abbey, Game of Thrones, The Good Wife, The Leftovers, and The Americans all strategically submitted one episode into the writing categories.
  • The shows that submitted a moderate amount of episodes into the writing categories are Veep (3), Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt (2), Transparent (3), Orange Is The New Black (3),
  • The shows that over-submitted into the writing races and might have hurt their chances of being nominated are Better Call Saul (8), Homeland (9), Modern Family (8), House of Cards (7), Vinyl (6), Broad City (4), and Girls (6).
  • The shows that strategically nominated one episode for directing are Crazy Ex-Girlfriend and Masters of None.
  • The shows that only submitted a couple of episodes for consideration in directing are Silicon Valley (2), Transparent (2), Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt (3), Veep (3), and Downton Abbey (3).
  • Shows that over-submitted in directing are Better Call Saul (9), Black-ish (5), Girls (6), Game of Thrones (5), Homeland (6), The Good Wife (5), House of Cards (4), Robot (5), and Vinyl (7).

crimestory

The nominating ballots also show how many people were submitted in each category and some categories are significantly more crowded than others:

Comedy Series – 96

Drama Series – 151

Limited Series – 26

TV Movie – 29

Lead Actor in a Comedy – 77

Lead Actor in a Drama– 109

Lead Actor in a Limited Series/TV Movie – 52

Lead Actress in a Comedy– 64

Lead Actress in a Drama – 81

Lead Actress in a Limited Series/TV Movie – 30

Supporting Actor in a Comedy– 202

Supporting Actor in a Drama – 388

Supporting Actor in a Limited Series/TV Movie – 105

Supporting Actress in a Comedy – 192

Supporting Actress in a Drama – 279

Supporting Actress in a Limited Series/TV Movie – 79

Guest Actor in a Comedy – 127

Guest Actor in a Drama – 127

Guest Actress in a Comedy– 107

Guest Actress in a Drama – 94

So readers, go take a look yourself and browse through nominating ballots. How many times did you notice a Zach Woods or Fred Armisen submission?

Jalal’s Take: Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series

Jalal Haddad takes a look at the Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series Emmy race in the first of many posts leading up to the Emmy nominations announcement on July 14th. Over the next month, Jalal will be providing his own expert analysis in individual races and covering the top ten contenders in each category.

1. Titus Burgess (Titus Andromedon), Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt

Tituss Burgess was robbed of an Emmy last year and, if the results were still based off episode judging panels, he would have won. He may not have had a scene that went viral like last year’s “Peeno Noir,” but he dominated season two from the beginning with storylines about his estranged wife and construction worker boyfriend. Burgess is by far the funniest supporting performance on television and the supporting actor race is incredibly weak, making it easy for Burgess to win his first Emmy. Netflix also seems to be campaigning him excessively, even giving him his own FYC commercial during the Tonys.

2. Tony Hale (Gary Walsh), Veep  

Photo courtesy of HBO.

The two time Emmy winner might be the safest bet of the entire category. Hale has had a lot of standout “small” moments throughout the fifth season including walking in on Selina having sex, his shock of the “C” word, and his obsession with his spot on The White House hottest staffers list. His Emmy wins have come through both systems of voting proving that Emmy voters really do love him so the actor who has been entertaining on television since Arrested Development should never be counted out for a win.

3. Ty Burrell (Phil Dunphy), Modern Family

Photo courtesy of ABC.

Ty Burrell has won two Emmys and is the only male actor from Modern Family to be nominated for all six seasons. As funny as he is, voters are slowly getting tired of Modern Family, and I doubt he could muster up enough popular support to actually win.

4. Keegan-Michael Key (Various Characters), Key & Peele

Photo courtesy of Comedy Central.

Keegan-Michael Key is quickly becoming one of the most popular comedic talents in Hollywood. Since his first acting nomination last year he has starred on three shows, lent his voice to two popular animated shows, and appeared as a guest on five other shows. His first nomination last year came as a surprise, mostly because most Emmy pundits weren’t anticipating how popular Key & Peele was becoming amongst voters. Now that the show is eligible for its final season it’s pretty safe to say that voters are going to continue supporting the show and its breakout star (but what about Peele?) unless they are confused by him being submitted for three different comedies in the supporting actor race.

5. Andre Braugher (Captain Ray Holt), Brooklyn Nine-Nine 

Photo courtesy of Fox.

Having nominated him nine times, Emmy voters love Andre Braugher.  For two years in a row he has been the only major nomination for FOX’s cop comedy and  because of that it’s probably safe to say that Braugher benefits from weak categories and the fact that voters simply like him and want to vote for him without ever watching Brooklyn Nine-Nine. Braugher would be easily expendable if there were only more competition in the supporting actor race, and unfortunately there is not.

6. Timothy Simons (Jonah Ryan), Veep

Photo courtesy of the Jonah Ryan for Congress campaign.

Besides Hale and Chlumsky the other supporting actors on Veep have struggled to be individually recognized by any awards group. Hopefully that isn’t the case now that Veep is the most popular comedy amongst Emmy voters. As season five progressed I noticed I was actually enjoying Jonah Ryan as he became a hilarious puppet in a campaign for office. I originally had him at #9 on the list but was inspired by Clarence’s advocacy piece to move him up to an actual nomination. The thought of Simons receiving a nomination and shaking up the supporting actor race is the most exciting news about this category all year. Now that the Emmy ballots are randomized I think he has an even greater chance of wooing over Emmy voters and making them forget how obnoxious his character was in the past.

7. Adam Driver (Adam), Girls 

Photo courtesy of HBO.

Girls’ fifth season was arguably the best yet and could bring Lena Dunham back into the best actress race but I’m having a hard time telling if Driver disappears into the background. The bulk of his material revolved around Adam hiding his relationship with Jessa but for some reason that doesn’t feel like enough. Voters might continue embracing him after starring in the seventh Star Wars, but starring in multiple blockbusters didn’t help Chris Pratt. I could be overthinking it and Emmy voters could easily embrace him for the fourth year in a row.

8. Jay Duplass (Josh Pfefferman), Transparent 

Photo courtesy of Amazon.

As boring and predictable as Emmy voters can be it is rare for a category to completely mimic the lineup of the year before. With no breakout hits in the comedy race a surprise nominee has to come out of an already popular show, right? Jay Duplass was surprisingly given some of the best material on Transparent’s second season with dealing with his new relationship and discovering he has a teenage son. Duplass would make an excellent addition to the category and deserves to get in off of performance alone although some might argue he doesn’t belong in a comedy category. In the end his chances will depend on how well voters embrace the second season especially since the Emmys have a history of losing interest in dramedies during their second season (Glee, Desperate Housewives, Orange is the New Black).

9. Jesse Tyler Ferguson, Ed O’Neill, Eric Stonestreet, Modern Family

Photo courtesy of ABC.

The way that Emmy voters started dropping the Modern Family actors from the category suggests that voters were just ticking off whoever came first on the ballot as opposed to picking their favorites. In reverse alphabetical order they dropped off with Stonestreet first, O’Neill second, Ferguson third, and now Burrell is the only actor that is still being nominated. Now that the television academy has shaken up the nomination system one of the actors could sneak back in. The likeliest to return is probably Stonestreet who won two Emmys and continued to be individually recognized by SAG even after he was forgotten by Emmy voters.

10. Sam Waterston (Sol Bergstein),Grace & Frankie

Photo courtesy of Netflix.

I was surprised last year when Emmy voters didn’t embrace Grace & Frankie more passionately, especially since the show appeals so well to older Emmy voters who love the stars of the show. No the show isn’t a critical hit but as trite as it feels the show makes me laugh more than a lot of the other big contenders. Waterston’s Sol is the easiest of the two ex-husbands to love even when he cheats on his fiancé with his ex-wife. Now that Netflix has begun a tremendously excessive campaign for their entire slate of programming, actors like Waterston might have a better chance of receiving a nomination.

Honorable Mentions: Martin Starr, Jordan Peele, TJ Miller, Martin Sheen

Readers, which six actors do you think will be nominated come announcement morning? Are we completely overestimating or underestimating someone on this list? Sound off below in the comments!

Emmys FYC: Gina Rodriguez Talks ‘Jane the Virgin’ Season Two

Golden Globe-winner Gina Rodriguez talks about the magic in Jane the Virgin.

Currently in London filming the new Alex Garland movie Annihilation, Golden Globe-winner Gina Rodriguez and I spent half our time talking about London and things she’s been doing there when she’s not filming. We almost forget to talk about Jane The Virgin. The CW show was shut out of the Emmys last year, but will things change this year? Gina Rodriguez was nominated for a second Golden Globe in the Best Comedy Actress category, and recently Emmy voters turned out for a For Your Consideration event, filling the room with tears of laughter.

If you’re not watching one of the funniest shows around, here’s a brief overview of why you need to catch up with the CW show before season three begins. Jane The Virgin stars Rodriguez as a virgin who gets accidentally artificially inseminated and ends up falling for the sperm donor. Jane hails from a Latino family, and that’s where the comedy arises. Comedy aside, the show deals with serious issues such as immigration and abortion. Many episodes have ended with cliffhangers that leave you waiting desperately for the next episode or next season!

I caught up with Gina Rodriguez to talk about season two and that wedding cliffhanger!

AwardsDaily TV: The emotions for the wedding episode ran the gamut and that dance with Rogelio was brilliant.

Gina Rodriguez: I love him so much.

ADTV: I did think, at one point, that the dance would not happen. I think everyone thought the same thing.

GR: With Michael getting shot, it’s the perfect suspense.

ADTV: Well, I was going to ask you, is Jane going to be a widow? There’s that episode where they say, “For as long as Michael lived, until he drew his very last breath.” Is that a foreshadowing?

GR: I don’t know that answer to that because I don’t know what’s going to happen. Jennie [Snyder Urman] keeps it real private. We see the following episodes the day before we start shooting it. We don’t really know anything in advance… maybe a few days in advance. So, I don’t know, but I don’t think so. My guess is not. After season one when Mateo got kidnapped, it was resolved quickly. In the same form from first to second season where she resolved it quickly, I have a feeling she’s going to do the exact same thing.

ADTV: On that episode, there were so many great moments – that silent moment between Jane and Rafael was one – but what were some of the stronger moments for you?

GR: I feel like this season was so magical. We had such an opportunity to play so many different characters with all the fantasy sequences. Jennie is so lovely in allowing all of us to do this kind of work. She just allowed me to fly where I got to do things where I wouldn’t as Jane in these fantasy sequence. It allows me to stretch my craft and to stretch and extend myself. The swimming, the rap, and the dance sequence are just some examples. Being able to dance with Derek Hough was such a highlight for me because I love salsa dancing, and I loved Derek Hough. It was magical.

All through the season, I get to play with comedy and with drama. Jennie does such a great job writing. As for the season finale, from that moment which is such a great moment with Rafael and Jane, the idea that we walk through life sometimes so selfishly. We don’t think about what our actions are going to do to somebody else. That was such a beautiful moment to show someone being selfless, and Rafael’s character being really selfless with Jane.

The exchanging of the vows was so emotional and so incredible. Michael doing his vows in Spanish, I love it, I died for it.

Gina Rodriguez
Photos courtesy of The CW.

ADTV: I loved it so much.

GR: We do those scenes from five different angles. A master, a close-up, over the shoulder, a track. We do so many, to do that scene with Bret fifteen times where we were crying every single time. Working with somebody so strong like Bret Dier, being able to be so connected to someone in this fantasy world. It’s a fantasy because we’re not married, we’re not in love, we’re not going to run off into the sunset. We’re friends and co-stars, so to be connected to somebody so well that you could just get to that space every single time. That was a really long day. We shot the wedding sequence over multiple days. Looking back, I feel so lucky that I get to work with somebody so fantastic and that I get to work my craft, my tool, and my engine. Also to look and to feel so proud.

Just talking to you is a huge triumph because you put out your art and you do as much as you possibly can. You say, I’m not going to be stopped by whatever limitations people may think we have because are on The CW, and we have “Latino show.” We have a great showrunner that allows us to do amazing things. The whole season has been better than season one. She just keeps getting better. She just keeps writing these magical storylines, and these fantasy sequences that we really can exercise our craft. It’s freaking awesome, and I can not wait to get back to season three. As much as I love London and I want Jane to come to London, I’m so excited to be part of a project that I actually freaking love.

ADTV: Let’s talk about the guests. You’ve had Britney Spears, Derek Hough, and of course Bruno Mars on the show. Who else would you like to see on the show?

GR: The truth is, every single person who has been on the show has wanted to be on the show. I met Bruno at the Cotto/Canello fight. He and his girlfriend are such big fans of the show. He asked me to come to the suite, and we were talking about Jane. They were saying how much they loved it. It’s the same with Lupita. I saw her in Eclipsed on Broadway. She said it was the only thing that gets her out of this negative space after this heavy play I do every night. She told me how she goes home and watches re-runs and it’s lightens her life. The truth is, everyone who has been on the show has wanted to come on the show. This was my second audition and I booked it, so come and play, have an amazing time, experience love and art.

ADTV: I have to ask about your foundation, We Will. What’s going on with that and how can people volunteer?

GR: We just put the foundation up, this past year. We’ve already started to work in the WestSide family health center which is located in Santa Monica. The majority are latino patients, and there are 95 percent of Latinos who work in the clinic. We are also working with multiple camps across the country that help inner city youth find sports to get scholarships for college be it lacrosse or rowing or sports that aren’t really taught in inner city communities, outside of basketball and baseball.

There’s a large opportunity for scholarships for children of color to get, but they’re not being utilized because those children aren’t taught those sports. We’re working with organizations that are doing that. We’re just starting up and are in our first few months. We have an amazing awards show coming up. I’ll be executive producing that, our foundation will be a part of as well.

Hopefully, we’ll have more opportunities for volunteers coming up. At the moment, my sister runs the foundation and is collecting information as to who needs assistance. So WWHU foundations stands for, We Will Help You, We Will Serve, We Will Be There, We Will Assist. We’re continuing to raising money so that we can help who ever is in need.

You can find out more about the Will Will Foundation on Twitter. Gina Rodriguez and Jane the Virgin will be back for season three on The CW this fall.