BEST PICTURE
Birdman
Boyhood
The Grand Budapest Hotel
BEST ACTOR
Jake Gyllenhaal – Nightcrawler
Michael Keaton – Birdman
Eddie Redmayne – The Theory of Everything
BEST ACTRESS
Julianne Moore – Still Alice
Rosamund Pike – Gone Girl
Reese Witherspoon – Wild
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Edward Norton – Birdman
Mark Ruffalo – Foxcatcher
J.K. Simmons – Whiplash
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Patricia Arquette – Boyhood
Jessica Chastain – A Most Violent Year
Emma Stone – Birdman
BEST ENSEMBLE
Birdman
Boyhood
The Grand Budapest Hotel
BEST DIRECTOR
Wes Anderson – The Grand Budapest Hotel
Alejandro Gonzalez Iñárritu – Birdman
Richard Linklater – Boyhood
BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
Birdman
Boyhood
The Grand Budapest Hotel
BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
Gone Girl
Inherent Vice
The Theory of Everything
BEST CINEMATOGRAPHY
Birdman
The Grand Budapest Hotel
Interstellar
BEST VISUAL EFFECTS
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes
Guardians of the Galaxy
Interstellar
BEST ART DIRECTION/PRODUCTION DESIGN
The Grand Budapest Hotel
Interstellar
Into the Woods
BEST SCORE
Gone Girl
Interstellar
Under the Skin
BEST DOCUMENTARY
Citizenfour
Life Itself
Jodorowsky’s Dune
BEST FOREIGN-LANGUAGE FILM
Ida (Poland)
Force Majeure (Sweden)
The Raid 2 (Indonesia)
BEST ANIMATED FEATURE
Big Hero 6
How to Train Your Dragon 2
The Lego Movie
PAULINE KAEL BREAKOUT AWARD
Jennifer Kent – The Babadook
Damien Chazelle – Whiplash
Gugu Mbatha-Raw – Belle/Beyond the Lights
Florida Film Critics winners have been announced on their site: http://www.floridafilmcritics.com/2014/12/19/2014-ffcc-award-winners/
Ryan, it’s pretty obvious I’m stating MY opinion. I’m not saying N.Y. is the be-all and end-all for everyone, but the New York Film Critics Circle has been giving out awards since 1936. They have an estimable history. They picked ”Citizen Kane” over ”How Green Was My Valley.” They picked ”Clockwork Orange” over ”The French Connection.” They picked ”Goodfellas” over ”Dances With Wolves.” I think their 78-year track record shows that they’re not in the business of predicting the Oscars. And whatever one thinks of the National Board of Review, it was founded in 1909 and has given out awards since the ’30s. I think I’ve agreed with many of their choices as opposed to the Oscar-winning pictures of that year. Among the NBR winners: ”Citizen Kane,” ”Sunset Blvd.,” ”All the President’s Men,” ”Days of Heaven,”’ ”Manhattan,” etc. Even now, they go their own idiosyncratic way: ”Hugo” (2011), ”Zero Dark Thirty” (2012), ”Her” (2013) and ”A Most Violent Year” (2014). You can criticize the NBR for many things, but not rubber-stamping other groups.
Look, all awards are subjective. If you’ve found a group that reflects your tastes, great! What bothers me is the glut of (fill in the name of a metropolitan area) critics’ groups that have sprouted like weeds in the past decade. When everyone and his dog is giving out awards, and often the same awards, I think it cheapens the actual honor. But everyone wants in on the act: Studios and stars need their egos stroked. Publicists have Oscar campaigns to run. Magazines and websites have ads to sell. Critics love to see their quotes in ads (and get their screeners). And there’s a horse race that needs to be fed. Often by those countless columns, prognostications and postings (like mine) that become just as obsolete as the silly plaques that collect the dust. 😉
So does this make the Boston film critics THE group to watch because it’s got the ”best” track record of matching the Oscars? That’s what I find so idiotic about this. So what if the New York film critics or L.A. critics don’t match up as often? Hopefully, they are offering THEIR choices for the best; perhaps, drawing more attention to the winners. It’s not an Oscar predictions pool. Also, the tallying of these various groups, as if they were all equally weighted, is ridiculous. Winning a prize from the N.Y. Film Critics Circle is NOT equivalent to winning the same prize from, say, the Northeastern Appalachian Online Film Society, formed 2 years ago (I just made up that group).
Huh! Only 3 nominees each category. Interesting. It seems like if you’re only gonna have 3 films nominated for Best Picture, right now, Birdman – Boyhood – The Grand Budapest Hotel are the main 3.
The Austin Film Critics have announced their awards. You can find them here: http://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/screens/2014-12-17/austin-film-critics-name-boyhood-best-of-year/
NY, LA, Chicago, Boston, DC, and Austin down. I think the only other somewhat major critics award to be handed out is the National Society of Film Critics, who vote in January. Considering all the other major critics awards went to Boyhood, I can only imagine that when all the major national critics get together, the picture they vote on will still be Boyhood, unless they feel like changing it up. I think I’m more interested at this point in seeing what the London critics pick. On a side note, there was an interesting piece in the Boston Globe about how predictive the “major” critics awards are of the Oscars. Not surprisingly, the author touts the Boston group as the most predictive of Best Picture. Here’s the link: http://www.bostonglobe.com/2014/12/10/how-predictive-are-city-film-critics-groups-awards-oscars/UzfKaEXS3Hi9Xude5VgPDN/story.html