The Oscar race has never been as divisive as it is in 2014, with factions splitting from the whole to create new worlds where film represents different things for different people. The critics have risen up agains the general consensus in a pronounced way, most notably by taking much of the focus off of American studio product and putting it mostly on films from other countries that have earned their admiration. Russia’s Leviathan, Poland’s Ida, France’s Two Days, One Night – good movies that ought to be considered in what should be renamed the International Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, as it was once called at its inception. Louis B. Mayer simplified it when he removed “International” from the name.
For the past four years, Best Director has gone to someone born in a country other than America – among them, only Ang Lee is a naturalized U.S. citizen. All of the others have hailed from foreign countries. It makes you wonder what the Americans are doing so wrong, why they can’t dazzle voters the way foreigners can. All that is going to change, however, as the Best Director race is already being led by several prominent Americans, like Richard Linklater, Ava DuVernay, David Fincher, Wes Anderson. They are joined by Alejandro Inarritu, the director that Anne Thompson is predicting to split with Best Picture, making the non-American winning the director category 5 years in a row.
Still, probably none of these directors have a chance of cracking either the DGA’s giant consensus vote or the smaller sampling of Academy directors who vote for the nominees in that category. The critics, though, have introduced films that might have a better chance with the Academy than with the larger guild vote.
First, a tiny factoid worth knowing if you don’t follow this website (since no other site, no other blogger that I’ve read finds this to be as important as I do). In 2012, for the first time since the DGA began handing out awards, the DGA nominees announcement came after Oscar ballots were turned in. The same thing happened last year. The same thing is going to happen again this year.
Here’s how it went down:
2013
Alfonso Cuaron, Gravity | Alfonso Cuaron, Gravity |
Steve McQueen, 12 Years a Slave | Steve McQueen, 12 Years a Slave |
Paul Greengrass, Captain Phillips | Alexander Payne, Nebraska |
David O. Russell, American Hustle | David O. Russell, American Hustle |
Martin Scorsese, The Wolf of Wall Street | Martin Scorsese, The Wolf of Wall Street |
2012
Steven Spielberg, Lincoln | Steven Spielberg, Lincoln |
Ang Lee, Life of Pi | Ang Lee, Life of Pi |
Ben Affleck, Argo | David O. Russell, Silver Linings |
Kathryn Bigelow, Zero Dark Thirty | Michael Haneke Amour |
Tom Hooper, Les Miserables | Benh Zeitlin, Beasts of the Southern Wild |
2011
Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist | Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist+ |
Martin Scorsese, Hugo | Martin Scorsese, Hugo* |
Alexander Payne, The Descendants | Alexander Payne, The Descendants* |
Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris | Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris* |
David Fincher, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo | Terrence Malick, Tree of Life* |
2010
Tom Hooper The King’s Speech | Tom Hooper the King’s Speech+ |
David Fincher, Social Network | David Fincher, Social Network* |
Darren Aronofsky, Black Swan | Darren Aronofsky, Black Swan* |
David O’Russell, The Fighter | David O’Russell, The Fighter* |
Christopher Nolan, Inception* | The Coens, True Grit* |
2009
Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker | Bigelow, Hurt Locker+ |
Lee Daniels, Precious | Lee Daniels, Precious* |
Jason Reitman, Up in the Air | Jason Reitman, Up in the Air* |
Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds | Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds* |
Jim Cameron, Avatar | Jim Cameron, Avatar* |
You can check out our DGA/Best Picture chart here to see how they lined up in previous years, but what’s most interesting to note is what happened two years ago, when the consensus picks Kathryn Bigelow and Ben Affleck were left of the Academy’s list. It caused quite a bit of uproar and was just one of the other details about Zero Dark Thirty and Argo that tied them together. Argo was “Zero Dark Thirty lite,” or “Zero Dark Thirty if the Americans were the good guys.” The one thing everyone seemed sure of was that both of those directors would be nominated.
But in a race with more than five Best Picture contenders, you’re not necessarily looking at Best Director the same way anymore. You’re looking at splitting up the two categories, not just how the Ben Affleck year, and the following year did it, where you had a split between Picture and director, but how you think about best Picture overall.
Academy voters have five slots to put down their nominees for Best Picture of the Year. Only five. Yet the race allows for more than five. The only real way we have of knowing how popular a film is overall with the Academy is how many branches nominate that film, but I’m going to go one further and say ESPECIALLY the director category.
The reason is that Director and Picture have been tied together for almost as long as the Academy has given out awards, give or take an early decade or two, but especially once they agreed to hand out five Best Picture nominees and five Best Director nominees.
While last year’s lineup, compared to the DGA, only missed one name, 2012’s missed three of the five names. That was a crazy irregularity when you look back on DGA/Academy history.
So if you go by nominations overall and look at what films were nominated for Best Picture in 2012 and what films were nominated for Best Director you can kind of see which films had the consensus, and therefore had a better shot at the DGA, and which films didn’t.
Let’s start with who did get nominated for Best Director that year:
Ang Lee, Life of Pi (11 nominations) Steven Spielberg, Lincoln (11 nominations) David O. Russell, Silver Linings Playbook (9 nominations) Michael Haneke, Amour (5 nominations) Benh Zietlin, Beasts (4 nominations)
And what remaining films were there?
Argo (7 nominations)
Les Miserables (8 nominations)
Zero Dark Thirty (6 nominations)
Django Unchained (5 nominations)
The DGA went for the following five:
Ang Lee
Steven Spielberg
Ben Affleck
Kathryn Bigelow
Tom Hooper
The DGA reflects the broader, more popular tastes, which explains why these films have such high nominations. The one exception is Silver Linings Playbook which did not get a DGA nod but did get an Academy nomination.
Further complicating things, and I know it’s confusing by now, but Oscar changed how they counted Best Picture. In 2009 and 2010 they had a straight ten for Best Picture, with no wiggle room. But in 2011, 2012 and 2013, they had members choose five of their favorite Best Pictures and then expanded the list depending on what kind of numbers they got. It was supposed to be anywhere from 5 to 10 but it has solidly turned up as 9. So close and yet so far. Having 10 allowed for much more diversity in the lineup.
Now let’s fold in the Critics Choice and the Golden Globes and see where we are:
2013
Globes | Critics Choice | DGA | Oscar
Alfonso Cuaron, Gravity | Alfonso Cuaron, Gravity | Alfonso Cuaron, Gravity | Alfonso Cuaron, Gravity |
Steve McQueen, 12 Years a Slave | Steve McQueen, 12 Years a Slave | Steve McQueen, 12 Years a Slave | Steve McQueen, 12 Years a Slave |
Alexander Payne, Nebraska | Alexander Payne, Nebraska | ||
David O. Russell, American Hustle | David O. Russell, American Hustle | David O. Russell, American Hustle | David O. Russell, American Hustle |
Martin Scorsese, The Wolf of Wall Street | Martin Scorsese, The Wolf of Wall Street | Martin Scorsese, The Wolf of Wall Street | |
Paul Greengrass, Captain Phillips | Paul Greengrass, Captain Phillips | Paul Greengrass, Captain Phillips | |
Spike Jonze, Her |
2012
Globes | Critics Choice | DGA | Oscar
Steven Spielberg, Lincoln | Steven Spielberg, Lincoln | Steven Spielberg, Lincoln | Steven Spielberg, Lincoln |
Ang Lee, Life of Pi | Ang Lee, Life of Pi | Ang Lee, Life of Pi | Ang Lee, Life of Pi |
Ben Affleck, Argo | Ben Affleck, Argo | Ben Affleck, Argo | |
Kathryn Bigelow, Zero Dark Thirty | Kathryn Bigelow, Zero Dark Thirty | Kathryn Bigelow, Zero Dark Thirty | Michael Haneke Amour |
Tom Hooper, Les Miserables | Tom Hooper, Les Miserables | Quentin Tarantino, Django | Benh Zeitlin, Beasts of the Southern Wild |
David O. Russell, Silver Linings | David O. Russell, Silver Linings |
2011
Globes | Critics Choice | DGA | Oscar
Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist | Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist+ | Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist | Michel Hazanavicius, The Artist+ |
Martin Scorsese, Hugo | Martin Scorsese, Hugo | Martin Scorsese, Hugo | Martin Scorsese, Hugo* |
Alexander Payne, The Descendants | Alexander Payne, The Descendants* | Alexander Payne, The Descendants | Alexander Payne, The Descendants* |
Steven Spielberg, War Horse | Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris* | Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris | Woody Allen, Midnight in Paris* |
Daldry, Extremely Loud | Ides of March, Clooney | David Fincher, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo | Terrence Malick, Tree of Life* |
Nicolas Refn, Drive |
2010
Globes | Critics Choice | DGA | Oscar
Tom Hooper The King’s Speech | Tom Hooper the King’s Speech+ | Tom Hooper The King’s Speech | Tom Hooper the King’s Speech+ |
David Fincher, Social Network | David Fincher, Social Network* | David Fincher, Social Network | David Fincher, Social Network* |
Darren Aronofsky, Black Swan | Darren Aronofsky, Black Swan* | Darren Aronofsky, Black Swan | Darren Aronofsky, Black Swan* |
Danny Boyle, 12 Hrs | David O’Russell, The Fighter* | David O’Russell, The Fighter | David O’Russell, The Fighter* |
Christopher Nolan, Inception* | Christopher Nolan, Inception* | Christopher Nolan, Inception* | |
Joel/Ethan Coen True Grit | The Coens, True Grit* |
2009
Globes | Critics Choice | DGA | Oscar
Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker | Bigelow, Hurt Locker+ | Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker | Bigelow, Hurt Locker+ |
Lee Daniels, Precious | Lee Daniels, Precious | Lee Daniels, Precious* | |
Jason Reitman, Up in the Air | Jason Reitman, Up in the Air* | Jason Reitman, Up in the Air | Jason Reitman, Up in the Air* |
Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds | Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds* | Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds | Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds* |
Jim Cameron, Avatar | Jim Cameron, Avatar* | Jim Cameron, Avatar | Jim Cameron, Avatar* |
Clint Eastwood, Invictus | Clint Eastwood, Invictus |
The only time the Globes and the BFCA matched on Best Director where their chosen film did not get in for Best Picture was in 2009, for Invictus. In all other years, when the Globes and Critics Choice matched on Best Director that movie was, at the very least, chosen for Best Picture.
So how is that list looking right now?
Wes Anderson – The Grand Budapest Hotel | Wes Anderson – The Grand Budapest Hotel |
Ava DuVernay – Selma | Ava DuVernay – Selma |
David Fincher – Gone Girl | David Fincher – Gone Girl |
Alejandro G. Iñárritu – Birdman | Alejandro G. Iñárritu – Birdman |
Richard Linklater – Boyhood | Richard Linklater – Boyhood |
Angelina Jolie – Unbroken |
This doesn’t prove how the race is going to go but it does show a rough, early consensus of how it might go. The one thing we can be mostly certain about is that the Globes won’t match Oscar 5/5 in the Best Director category, at least going by these years. There is a much higher chance for an Oscar Best Picture nomination for all of the Globe-nominated directors than an Oscar Best Director nod.
This is a strange year with Best Picture contenders floating into the race and dominating, despite their mostly no-name directors. Two of them, The Theory of Everything and The Imitation Game. Neither director, so far, of either film has shown up in any major or minor awards. Of course, with the Oscar race for Best Director there are only two groups that count, the Directors Guild and the Academy. I’ll add a third, the Editors because editors work so closely with directors that you can almost always unify them.
First, why haven’t Morton Tyldum and James Marsh gained any traction? Who are they and why are they here? It’s either that no one really knows who they are or it’s that their films don’t have distinguishing characteristics about them that push these names above the other directors, the ones whose style takes prominence over the story. With the two British offerings, they are probably viewed on the same scale, or they cancel one another out, as suspected. If Tom Hooper got in, why can’t either of these two? Probably because there are two.
2014 feels all over the place to me, with the smallest possible consensus in the Best Director race emerging as:
1. Linklater
2. Inarritu
3. DuVernay
4. Fincher
5. Anderson
I’d order them that way, with the likelihood of either Anderson or Fincher to be replaced at the Oscars with someone else — but who that someone else might be is a mystery until we hear from the DGA.
The DGA is probably more inclined to pick Fincher because they picked him for the Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, which tells me they admire his work overall. But the Academy didn’t. I’m not getting my hopes up for a directing nomination at the Oscars but Best Picture is looking much more likely. Gone Girl is, to me, up there with Selma and Boyhood as the film of the year so it’s a no-brainer to me to imagine a directing five but I’m going to bet that the Academy is going to be more inclined to pick someone in the realm of:
Mike Leigh, Mr. Turner
Damien Chazelle, Whiplash
Bennett Miller, Foxcatcher
Morton Tyldum, Imitation Game
James Marsh, Theory of Everything
Angelina Jolie, Unbroken
Honestly, beyond Linklater, Inarritu and DuVernay I have no idea what direction Best Director is headed. Then again, I remember saying in 2012 that the only sure bets were Kathryn Bigelow and Ben Affleck. Ava DuVernay is likely to make Academy history this year so even without Gone Girl in the running it will be a fantastic year for AwardsDaily.
January 8 The Academy’s ballots are turned in
January 12 The DGA’s final ballots are turned in
January 13 DGA’s nominee announcement
January 15 The Academy’s nominee announcement
We are dwelling in a new kind of Oscar race where we’re looking at more than five for Best Picture but still five for Best Director and it doesn’t necessarily follow anymore than the director winner is going to match with Best Picture. That must be why Anne Thompson is predicting a split year between Birdman and Boyhood. I’m not feeling a split year, though. I think it’s Linklater and Boyhood all the way.
“Oscar replaces Fincher and Anderson with Nolan and Eastwood”
The director’s branch has proven itself to be more adventurous than many of the other branches these last few years, so I don’t think they will pick either Nolan or Eastwood. They will go for Chazelle and Anderson (or Fincher) in addition to the three ‘locks’.
That Rex Reed top ten…. it’s almost refreshing, isn’t it?;)
Oh, I guess he did the same last year too…
http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/rex-reed-names-to-the-wonder-inside-llewyn-davis-her-spring-breakers-among-worst-films-of-2013-20131219
Still, isn’t it ridiculous to list films that have received generally favorable or unanimously positive reviews as being among the worst of the year? I think it really makes someone look laughable when they list such films along with Exodus and Tammy which have been generally derided overall…
she’s got that Deborah Kerr/Peter O’Toole taint
I didn’t even know they shared one, much less that she inherited it.
(See. This is what happens when you don’t do an article on the biggest story of our times. I get bored and stuff like that happens.)
I’m curious to see what happens with Fincher in the directors’ race. I do think he stands a good shot at getting a DGA nomination. I’m less sure about an Oscar nomination, since in the past AMPAS hasn’t really gone for Genre Fincher. This could be the year that tendency is broken, of course, but now that Wes Anderson has seemingly climbed to the #4 contender in the race, that movement has tightened up the director race even more. I don’t really expect Chazelle to get a DGA nomination, but I could see him breaking into the Oscar list. Hmm.
Just for the record, while I feel convinced that Linklater/Inarritu/DuVernay will get nominated, I’m not as strongly convinced about Anderson. I do have him at #4 right now and think he has a very good shot of getting nominated, but if he ended up getting left off the Oscar list, I wouldn’t be hugely surprised. The Grand Budapest Hotel is such a highly stylized movie that I could see it going either way with the directors branch.
I feel the same about Moore, but she’s got that Deborah Kerr/Peter O’Toole taint. She’s always great, will have plenty of chances, and then – poof. There’s almost more status to be gained by her losing again.
Can’t remember where I saw it, but somebody said the only way Redmayne will lose is if Harvey starts a rumor that Stephen Hawking is faking it.
Phantom, I couldn’t agree more with you about Leonardo DiCaprio deserving last year’s Oscar for Best Actor. GoldDerby.com calls it the ”Slap the Stud” syndrome. Among the matinee idols who never won a Best Actor trophy in their prime: Warren Beatty, Montgomery Clift, James Dean, Kirk Douglas, Harrison Ford, Cary Grant, Mel Gibson, Rock Hudson, Steve McQueen, Brad Pitt, Robert Redford, etc. The Oscars notoriously rewarded Paul Newman his Academy Award on his 7th nomination (while he was in his 60s); he was so tired of the chase that he didn’t even attend the Oscar ceremony to pick it up. Frankly, I believe the Oscar voters (many older white men) resent ”pretty boys,” so they rarely reward them unless … they go behind the camera. … Matthew McConaughey beat the ”Slap the Stud” syndrome with his comeback story and by losing 47 pounds and playing a patient ravaged by AIDS.
“Basically, the only battles right now, as I see it, rests with the female actors. BP, BD (Boyhood), BActor(Redmayne) and BSActor(Simmons) appear to be unbeatable becasue we haven’t seen any surprise surges by the competition.”
Weirdly, I think the most competition rests with Best Actor. If Julianne Moore is suddenly being considered beatable because Cotillard won NYFCC and a few of the smaller awards, along with Rosamund Pike winning a few of the smaller critic prizes, how can Redmayne be considered unbeatable when he’s won almost nothing yet by way of the critic prizes? That doesn’t make sense to me. I think it’s very possible that Redmayne does end up winning the Oscar, but I’m confused how Julianne Moore losing a few of the critic prizes make her vulnerable while Redmayne winning nothing makes him unbeatable. I know that The Theory of Everything will likely end up in the Best Picture category and Still Alice won’t, but Still Alice and The Theory of Everything have the exact same score on–wait for it–Metacritic, so there’s not any real difference in critical reception between Theory and Still Alice.
Moore/Cotillard/Pike have won a roughly equal number of prizes so far, I think. Since Moore is the front runner, the fact that the awards she isn’t winning are split mostly between two different actresses instead of just one ends up helping her, in a weird way. If you’re a front runner who isn’t winning all the awards, then it’s better for the awards you’re not winning to be divided between two or more actors rather than just one, because it keeps one clear consensus alternative from forming.
This whole discussion is probably moot, because when we get to the televised awards, I really think Moore is going to nail the wins, one right after the other. It’s very difficult for me to picture it going any other way.
Yes.
Now what are we supposed to be talking about? Oh yeah. Directors. Linklater is winning. Because he is. But I’m never going to see BOYHOOD now because I’m boycotting AMC. lol Unless Flagship gets it. When is it due on video? After the Oscars?
That’s sweet, but did you notice that you only talk to me when I have a Tom Hardy avatar?
I’m just glad you weren’t abducted by aliens who sent two replacements. Because that’s what I thought had happened. 😛
(f**k it, I’ll go back to my old handle – didn’t think anybody would notice 🙂 )
I can’t begin to guess how Oscar and the DGA will match up with regards to nominees – they won’t match, for sure, and could be off as much as 3 this year. One thing I think is certain: the winners of the DGA and Oscar will match and, for the first time in awhile, he (sorry, Ava) will be an American. Linklater has got this. His task was as monumental in its own way as Cuaron’s last year or Lee’s the year before.
Basically, the only battles right now, as I see it, rests with the female actors. BP, BD (Boyhood), BActor(Redmayne) and BSActor(Simmons) appear to be unbeatable becasue we haven’t seen any surprise surges by the competition.
@Danny
Tom Cruise definitely should have been nominated for ‘Collateral’ and ‘Minority Report’ but didn’t because they are action films. And ‘Vanilla Sky’ was a risk.
This is a very interesting discussion. I hope more than anything that the directors of the biopics, the most boring genre in cinema, will not take the place of auteurs like Anderson or Fincher this year. We all know that ‘The Theory of Everything’ and ‘The Imitation Game’ do not belong in the Oscar conversation.
Could the Dardenne brothers get in, or is this wishful thinking? Every now and then this will happen, with an Almodovar or Meirelles or Haneke getting a surprise nomination. Or perhaps it will be Mike Leigh for Mr. Turner?
JP
Whoah, I completely forgot about that. So the sole BD award Hooper won instead of Fincher, was the DGA…and it was enough. Goes to show the power of the guilds.
@ Phantom
Actually Fincher won Bafta. It was the americans who gave it Hooper incredibly. I hate the outcome of that season more than any other.
“I see a parallel between the huge male movie stars who can’t get a Best Actor Oscar (Leonardo DiCaprio, Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Christian Bale, Will Smith, Tom Cruise, Johnny Depp etc.) and the superstar directors who can barely get nominated let alone win (David Fincher, Christopher Nolan etc.) ”
Nah, Stephen Spielberg gets nominated all the time, doesn’t he? James Cameron (when he makes a movie)? Peter Jackson (once upon a time)? For both the actors and the directors you mention, it really comes down to the PROJECTS that they choose to do. These people are always (and justifiably so) concerned with making hits and maintaining their status as Hollywood rainmakers. They don’t often take on the risky material that challenges them and garners awards attention. Last time Tom Cruise took a risk? Probably Magnolia, right? And he got a nom for it. If Will Smith would do another Six Degrees of Separation or Brad Pitt would do another True Romance – guaranTEED they would get Noms. Their starpower doesn’t work against them; in fact, it helps them gain attention when they take a risk.
By the way, Into the Woods is getting pretty good reviews (70+ on MC, 80+ on RT) right now so if the final consensus stays in the same ballpark AND it makes a ton of money as it is expected to, I think even Marshall may not be out of the realm of possibilities in BD in the end. Timing-wise it is all pretty perfect : voting for nominees starts on 29 December and ends on 8th of January…and if Into the Woods continues to get good reviews and deliver a splashy first few weeks at the Box Office, it will ALL happen right when voting goes down…an angle that may be worth considering.
“I don’t know, I like Tarantino but I feel we already know too much about The Hateful Eight. It will lack the WOW factor. When I think Iñárritu + Lubezki + DiCaprio + Hardy… here’s my early (very early) frontrunner.”
That is a good point. The wow factor would be minimized now. I like that team Iñárritu has going there. It might be Birdman + Gravity + Inception. DAMN!!
I see a parallel between the huge male movie stars who can’t get a Best Actor Oscar (Leonardo DiCaprio, Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Christian Bale, Will Smith, Tom Cruise, Johnny Depp etc.) and the superstar directors who can barely get nominated let alone win (David Fincher, Christopher Nolan etc.) : it does feel like they are being punished for being way too successful (=powerful) in the business and get the “they already have everything, why give them an Oscar, too” treatment. Stupid, I know…but just remember
1. DiCaprio not only has never won but wasn’t nominated for a bunch of high-profile, critically acclaimed roles, several of them in big hit films (Catch me if you can, The Departed, Revolutionary Road, Shutter Island, Inception, J.Edgar) and he lost Best Actor to first-time nominees with “a narrative” on all three occasions (then widely considered only “rapper/comedian” Jamie Foxx: a beloved veteran who paid his dues and earned his role of a lifetime at last (Forest Whitaker) and the famous McConaissance (a.ka. from straight to DVD Surfer Dude to one of THE best actors today). It must be said that those three performances were flawless and utterly deserving, still, it is strange that McConaughey only needed one really good year to win when DiCaprio couldn’t with a REALLY good decade behind him (full disclosure : as brilliant as McConaughey turned out to be, I considered DiCaprio’s turn the better and more deserving one last year).
2. Brad Pitt has been one of the most famous and acclaimed leading men in film for two decades so last year he finally won his first Oscar…for producing.
3. George Clooney was the early frontrunner for The Descendants, even won the Golden Globe and Critics Choice to prove it but in the end lost to unknown Jean Dujardin. It was Clooney’s third nod in Best Actor in five years. A few years back he did win in supporting, though…
4. … just like another wildly successful leading man Christian Bale who somehow failed to receive a single Best Actor nod in spite of stellar, Oscar-worthy work in films like American Psycho, The Machinist, The Prestige, Rescue Dawn, 3:10 to Yuma and The Dark Knight. After all those brilliant lead turns, he received his first nomination and eventually win in supporting…and then got his first LEAD nod for American Hustle of all films…
5. I admit Will Smith isn’t as strong of an example as the others because almost exclusively he sticks to blockbuster tentpoles. Still, he was great in Ali and though The Pursuit of Happiness is no masterpiece, it could have been his blindside (emotionally manipulative big hit).
6. Sure, he is a divisive person, but I would never question the ridiculous amount of charisma, screen presence and talent Tom Cruise. Still no Oscar. Hell, for like a decade now (The Last Samurai) he can’t even get nominated.
7. Johnny Depp won the oh so crucial SAG for Pirates of the Caribbean and in my opinion the Oscar would have been well-deserved, too…after all he created one of THE most memorable and iconic film characters of the decade. The Academy went with Sean Penn playing the kind of role they love : the screamingpunchinggrievingcryingavenging father. After that he simply had bad luck : Weinstein couldn’t have secured him the Oscar for Finding Neverland over the likes of Jamie Foxx and Leonardo DiCaprio (to be fair, nobody could have) and nobody could touch DDL’s towering performance a few years later when Depp was up for the award with Sweeney Todd.
8. Christopher Nolan has received three DGA nominations. Memento, The Dark Knight, Inception. Zero BD Oscar nomination. Zero. Yet his films continue to be considered critically acclaimed ‘events’ which is pretty impressive…and basically unprecedented when it comes to films based on original screenplays like Inception and Interstellar.
9. David Fincher’s favourite hobby was/is to create instant, cult-bound classics like Se7en, Fight Club and Zodiac yet after all those, his first Oscar nomination came for The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, another Fincher classic (and in my opinion underrated masterpiece) that was considerably more Academy-friendly than his previous films. Yet no Oscar. Then he pulled off a near-unblemished sweep a few seasons later with The Social Network…still no Oscar. Another DGA nomination for The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo…not even a nomination.
It might be noted that neither Morten Tyldum nor James Marsh have been nominated by their British brethren so far. Neither made the cut for Best Director at the British Independent Film Awards and the London Film Critics’ Circle. (However, Mike Leigh did. Is it because he’s better-known? I haven’t seen ”Mr. Turner” yet, so did the nominators simply think Leigh did a better job?) Or maybe the Brit biopics just didn’t lend themselves to the same kind of showmanship in ”Boyhood” (a film shot over 12 years) or ”Birdman” (a sort of magic realism). Then again, didn’t Tyldum and Marsh do the same kind of straight-forward, British biopic that Tom Hooper did for ”The King’s Speech”? And Hooper won the Oscar. Yeah, I still think David Fincher was robbed that year; ”The Social Network” was more of a directorial achievement. But I imagine the Oscar voters warmed up to ”King’s Speech” more, so there ya’ go!
You know, it’s been bothering me for a while now, but why is it significant that the last handful of Best Director winners aren’t American-born, exactly? Half of the four were American productions, anyway. This isn’t even the first time this happened. Back in the 60s, we had the Hungarian Fred Zinneman, the German Mike Nichols, and the two Brits Carol Reed and John Schlesinger – another four in a row (five if you wanna count Schaffner, who was born in Tokyo). Plenty of other two- or three-in-a-rows, most recently before this decade with Roman Polanski and Peter Jackson. I think this is more of a fun statistic than something indicative of a trend in the inherent directorial abilities of American-born people.
re: why pundits may underestimate Fincher : the Academy opted to give the Oscar to a relative unknown (Hooper) who won exactly zero BD awards from critics groups instead of Fincher who won 20+ BD awards including NYFCC, LAFCA, WAFCA, NSFC + Golden Globe and Critics Choice…that was the year when I realised that at the end of the day, all precursor awards MAY influence the final outcome, but the only two that REALLY count are the ones overlapping with the Academy voting body (Guilds and Bafta…the only two BD awards Fincher lost and Hooper won pre-Oscar, were the DGA (I still don’t get that one) and the Bafta (sure, I thought “homeboy”). All this was immortalised in my first awards chart, now a bittersweet sight to say the least : http://dijleso.blogspot.hu/2010/12/awards_9651.html
@Al Robinson
I don’t know, I like Tarantino but I feel we already know too much about The Hateful Eight. It will lack the WOW factor. When I think Iñárritu + Lubezki + DiCaprio + Hardy… here’s my early (very early) frontrunner.
Sasha
Based on the pieces I read from Feinberg, to me it feels like his prediction that Gone Girl will NOT be a player is based A LOT on subjective staff like “people didn’t clap THAT hard at the Academy screening” or “Academy members I talked to didn’t like it”. I have no right to judge his prediction process mainly because he tends to be dead-on in the end, but I think that whole bunch is off on Fincher this year. They may underestimate him because he missed the last time even with the DGA nod (Tattoo) or that because he couldn’t sweep in a year he was destined to (Benjamin Button vs. Slumdog), I don’t really know. What I do know that the new rule (5% No1) favours the divisive films, sometimes those are the little-seen arthouse fares (The Tree of Life, Beasts of the Southern Wild) but I think this year it is the big fat studio hit that is Gone Girl…and if that BP nod happens due to the rule – and I think it will – the BD nod won’t be far off from there, especially with someone as respected, acclaimed (and Oscarless) as Fincher.
P.S. The Academy also loves to look “edgy” (Beasts of the Southern Wild) and they also love big fat hits (The Blind Side), so I am counting on them NOT being able to resist a film that has both of those qualities they seem to desire so much.
Corvo, I’m excited for The Revenant as well, and I think Iñárritu will do a great job, but what if, just… what if Quentin Tarantino wins instead for The Hateful Eight?
I think at Oscars either Anderson or Fincher will be replaced be Tyldum/Marsh/Chazelle, and i think it might be Chazelle.
Linklater, Inarritu and DuVernay are locks.
They won’t split this year. Iñárritu is going to win next year, bringing to victory also the most overdue actor in Hollywood history.
1. RICHARD LINKLATER (early frontrunner and critics group favourite)
2. ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ INNARITU (early runner-up and critics’ favourite)
3. AVA DUVERNAY (rave reviews, big studio, history in the making)
4. DAVID FINCHER (the Fincher + Zeitgeist should prove to be an irresistible combination for voters)
5. CHRISTOPHER NOLAN (the DGA loves him and the guilds in general tend to embrace his films much more than the other voting bodies)
I think so too, re: Fincher but I’m baffled at Scott Feinberg who still has it listed, even after the Critics Choice and the Globes, at number 12. Then again, he and Kris and Dave have been right in the past where I have been wrong – Fincher is a blind spot for me and they know it – but I can’t really convince them, nor do I want to. I’ll be happy if it gets in but my expectations are low.
The directors of the two Brit biopics aren’t getting nominated anywhere because they’re simply averagely directed, in my opinion.
Phantom,
Based on what I’ve seen so far, here would be my own Best Director 5:
David Ayer – Fury
**David Fincher – Gone Girl**
Alejandro González Iñárritu – Birdman
Bennett Miller – Foxcatcher
Christopher Nolan – Interstellar
I agree it’s Linklater and Boyhood all the way. Five Oscars. I’m surprised Thompson is predicting the split. I know that Innaritu is the acclaimed arthouse director a la Cuaron, but Thompson’s going against her own “degree of difficulty” maxim. For degree of difficulty, it was Lee. It was Cuaron. It will be Linklater.
This year, I think DGA will only have 3 of the same director nominees as the Oscars (like the situation two yrs ago when Bigelow and Affleck were snubbed). I feel like Bennett Miller or Mike Leigh will get in one place and not the other. Same with Fincher.
PETE
I can see Wes Anderson or the “Whiplash guy” (known in other circles as Damien Chazelle) make the cut at the Oscars, but I stand by my DGA (!) prediction. They LOVE Nolan and sure, that may go nowhere this year and your prediction may become reality but for now, that’s how I see it.
PETE
Sony can be accused with a lot of things, but I think it is fairly certain the film was pulled by the theaters. Sony just made it official.
It is still just so startling how different the DGA 5 and the Oscar 5 were in 2012.
My guess for the DGA 5:
Wes Anderson – The Grand Budapest Hotel
Damien Chazelle – Whiplash
Ava DuVernay – Selma
Alejandro González Iñárritu – Birdman
Richard Linklater – Boyhood
No way does Nolan get the fifth DGA spot. That’s probably Wes Anderson or the Whiplash guy.
1. RICHARD LINKLATER (early frontrunner and critics group favourite)
2. ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ INNARITU (early runner-up and critics’ favourite)
3. AVA DUVERNAY (rave reviews, big studio, history in the making)
4. DAVID FINCHER (the Fincher + Zeitgeist should prove to be an irresistible combination for voters)
5. CHRISTOPHER NOLAN (the DGA loves him and the guilds in general tend to embrace his films much more than the other voting bodies)
Off topic
Does the DGA have a strict rule about what constitutes an eligible film in terms of screenings? Because a protest/solidarity nomination for Evan Goldberg and Seth Rogen would be more than appropriate….what Sony did today is going to set a VERY bad precedent.
Great photo timeline, but which one is missing–Robert Benton or Michael Cimino?