Best Actress has been an unexciting race this year because Julianne Moore has been the projected winner since her shining reviews for Still Alice emerged from the Toronto Film Festival in September. Moore has never won an Academy Award, despite four nominations and twenty years of respected and lauded work. Her path to victory this year has been smooth and unchallenged, as she has won all of the major precursor awards: Critics Choice, Golden Globe, and Screen Actors Guild. But Moore may have her most difficult competition with winning the final Oscar-prerequisite, the British Academy Award.
This year’s acting races for the Academy Awards are mostly sewn up. J.K. Simmons for Whiplash, Patricia Arquette for Boyhood, Moore for Still Alice, and since winning the SAG, Eddie Redmayne for The Theory of Everything (pending his expected BAFTA win).
The BAFTAs are a good tool for foreshadowing winners at the Oscars, yet many do not realize that only 3 times in the past 25 years have the same four acting champions from BAFTA duplicated their success at the Oscars. (Those years were 2011, 2007, and 2006.) So if Redmayne, Moore, Simmons, and Arquette are the likely Oscar winners, then will any of them miss the BAFTA? Arquette and Simmons are unstoppable, and Redmayne is extremely safe to the win the BAFTA. If Moore’s film was not such a small production and had more momentum going for it than just her performance, it would be easier to see why the BAFTA may feel compelled to reward her.
Most of Moore’s narrative this season has hinged on the idea that she is painfully overdue to win, and playing a woman with early-on-set Alzheimer’s disease would satisfy voters’ need to recognize her. The performance itself is devastating, so it would be a deserved win but that does not matter as much as the “overdue” factor in her case. The woman has paid her dues and it is finally “her time.” My question is: will the BAFTAs feel the same urge to keep the flow of the season unanimously in Moore’s favor?
When Kate Winslet and Helen Mirren were considered overdue in their respective winning years, both were victorious at the BAFTAs before the Oscars. But yet, they are both British actresses and were nominated for roles that would easily appeal to British voters.
I am not saying the BAFTAs only look to reward British actors, but recent history has shown UK actresses and foreign language performances have upset the American actress/role in this category’s frontrunner position:
1. Marion Cotillard, relatively unknown then, won the BAFTA for a breakout performance in La Vie en Rose over veteran actress Julie Christie in Away from Her after Christie collected the same awards Moore has already nabbed for Still Alice.
2. Emmanuelle Riva in Amour took the BAFTA from the 2012 favorites, Jennifer Lawrence in Silver Linings Playbook and Jessica Chastain in Zero Dark Thirty.
3. Carey Mulligan’s work in the British film An Education won her the BAFTA, even though Meryl Streep for Julie and Julia and Sandra Bullock for The Blind Side were the two battling performers in 2009. (Bullock was not nominated for the BAFTA, but Streep was.)
The BAFTAs nominated two British actresses in their Lead Actress category this year, Rosamund Pike for Gone Girl and Felicity Jones for The Theory of Everything. Both women have narratives to upset Moore’s streak of winning this season.
Jones is a fetching English rose who has been everywhere promoting her richly rewarded film this season. The Theory of Everything was adored by the British Academy, so much so that James Marsh made it into Best Director. Her film received a whooping ten nominations, so she could benefit from the ample amount of good will towards the film. Though the story is about Stephen Hawking, Jones is more active and dominant during the second half of the film after her co-star, Eddie Redmayne, becomes immobile and unable to speak. But there’s major problem with Jones spoiling Moore’s sweep: Next to the other nominees, her role looks lighter, easier, and less challenging. How many voters will remember the impact of her performance more than the roaring sucker punches of acting from Moore, Pike, and Witherspoon?
The other British nominee is Pike who flourishes in the role of a lifetime in Gone Girl. The BAFTAs could decide to pick her for several reasons. 1) Gone Girl was an enormous financial success. It was the 12th highest grossing movie of last year in the United Kingdom. 2) Her startling character is likely to be the most remembered role of the nominees. 3) She physical transforms her body on the screen. If the voters fail to see the deep complexities behind her entire performance, they will surely notice Pike’s multiple weight-losses and weight-gains within the 150-minute movie. 4) Despite being more popular in the UK, Pike was relatively unknown to American audiences before this movie, and yet was sought out by David Fincher and trusted to lead a huge Hollywood production.
She may not have a British role, but it’s almost like a Cinderella story of sorts: an obscure English actor is cast in a Fincher film and becomes an overnight sensation with audiences around the world. It has also been demonstrated that Pike’s performance is the most popular performance—with the exception of Moore—in the race. She won twelve critics association awards for Gone Girl, more than anyone in the race this year. Her support in the UK has also established by her win from the London Critics Circle.
Reese Witherspoon and Amy Adams round out the list of nominees, but neither have what it takes to really pull through here. Witherspoon’s nomination was her reward and validates her BAFTA win for Walk the Line in 2005. Maybe it would be a closer race if she would have been able to create more traction in the past few months, but Wild never took off enough for her to be a threat. Amy Adams was not even Oscar-nominated for Big Eyes, and most of the non-Oscar-nominees who win BAFTAs are in the supporting categories, like Thandie Netwon for Crash and Sigourney Weaver for The Ice Storm.
Moore is the safest nominee to predict considering she had three previous BAFTA nominations without a win and her steamrolling success through every other major award show, but Jones and Pike do stand a chance to steal the trophy from under her frontrunner nose.
only 3 times in the past 25 years have the same four acting champions from BAFTA duplicated their success at the Oscars. (Those years were 2011, 2007, and 2006.
That’s an extremely misleading statement. BAFTA wasn’t considered a strong Oscar precursor until the last ten years, its position solidified by an expanding Oscar race and by the writers’ strike in early 2008, which cancelled the Golden Globes ceremony and increased the media attention on the BAFTAs. Furthermore, BAFTA wasn’t even moderately relevant to the Oscar race before the last fifteen years, when its ceremony was held after the Oscars. Distributors have responded by the British Academy’s increasing viability as a major stop on the road to Oscar by campaigning specifically for BAFTA and adjusting their strategies and release dates accordingly. The past 25 years? How about the past 8? It’s the same number, but wildly different statistics. 3/25 or 3/8? Very different pictures.
I’m on the Force Majeure bandwagon too. It is an amazing film and it’s simply absurd it wasn’t even nominated in the Foreign Film category.
Do not EVER underestimate Marion Cotillard.
MWeyer: In the 20 years that SAG has given out awards, only 3 of it’s Best Actors winners failed to win the Oscar. The odds heavily favors Eddie Redmayne.
The SAG is a much better indicator than BAFTA – since only 10 of the last 20 BAFTA Best Actor winners went on to win the Oscar.
“AMPAS tottally shut out gone girl with just a sinlge nom for Rosamund just to show that she is not in contention.”
What? The Academy deliberately didn’t vote for Gone Girl in any other category than Best Actress to make sure Rosamund wouldn’t be any threat to Julianne for the win? Really? If they were that concerned about making sure Julianne didn’t have any competition, wouldn’t it have been easier just to not nominate Rosamund? *scratches head*
“Does Patricia Arquette need to win every award?”
Yes.
It would be great if BAFTA surprised us with different winners. Does Patricia Arquette need to win every award?
Sometimes I think BAFTA members don’t appreciate British actors enough these days.
I expect Moore to win both BAFTA and Oscar. While Arquette will win an Oscar as well, I wouldn’t be surprised to see Knightley take the BAFTA, just as Helena Bonham Carter took it for The King’s Speech.
Next year it’s Blanchett (frontrunner) vs. Cotillard. And the showdown begins in May at Cannes!
George-“Anyway to quote Katrine Hepbourn when she was consoling Audrey Heybourn on her first oscar loss.”Take heart dear you will definately win one you dont derserve one day”
George, Audrey won on her first nomination for Roman Holiday in 1953. Also both last names are Hepburn,
I know this is an unpopular opinion but for me Moore isn;t the best this year. Julianne Moore is going to win the Oscar, no question about it, but there;s other better performances. In order of prefence:
5-Marion Cotillard (Deux Jours, Un Nuit): Good performance but she has been better.
4-Rosamund Pike(Gone Girl) : Not a big fan of the movie and just an average performance
3-Julianne Moore: Solid acting but Moore is solid in everything she does, this has been trying before with better results (Away From Her, Amour)
2-Felicity Jones (The Theory of Everything): People should see this movie again, this is the story of Jane Hawkings, based in her memoirs, told from her point of view and she is great in the film.
1-Reese Witherspoon (Wild): The best of the year and no even close she shine in this role and if there were some justice she (along with Laure Dern) would win her second Oscar.
“Moore in The Hours > Moore in Magnolia > Moore in Boogie Nights > Moore in A Single Man > Moore in Far from Heaven > Moore in The End of the Affair > Moore in The Kids Are All Right > Moore in Children of Men > Moore in As the World Turns > Cotillard > Witherspoon > Jones > Pike > Moore in Still Alice”
What about Moore in The Lost World: Jurassic Park??
Moore will win and she should for her phenomenal performance. Haters gonna hate… I mean there are Pike fans and then there are Cotillard and both are reducing down an honest and truly magnificent performance to “oh she is overdue so she will win”. This is what I hate about awards season, specially the Oscars.
I only saw one, Reese, in Wild and she was very good. Ironically, I like to see good acting performances, and none of the subject matter appealed to me.
Top 15 Best Performances by an Actress in a Leading Role, 2014.
1. Scarlett Johansson – UNDER THE SKIN
2. Agata Trzebuchowska – IDA
3. Isabelle Huppert – ABUSE OF WEAKNESS
4. Rosamund Pike – GONE GIRL
5. Marion Cotillard – TWO DAYS, ONE NIGHT
6. Charlotte Gainsbourg – NYMPHOMANIAC
7. Gugu Mbatha-Raw – BEYOND THE LIGHTS
8. Karidja Toure – GIRLHOOD
9. Lisa Loven Kongsli – FORCE MAJEURE
10. Anne Dorval – MOMMY
11. Hillary Swank – THE HOMESMAN
12. Marion Cotillard – THE IMMIGRANT
13. Essie Davis – THE BABADOOK
14. Tilda Swinton – ONLY LOVERS LEFT ALIVE
15. Gina Piersanti – IT FELT LIKE LOVE
Tessa Thompson in Dear White People >>> Felicity Jones
Charlotte Gainsbourg in Nymphomaniac > this category
Cotillard in the Oscar nominee luncheon photo > all performances in every Oscar category this year
Lets be honest ..Juliane Moore is only winning because she is overdue. Her movie is very forgettable and her performance is good but not great. I hate that she has to win now because of all her previous losses.Rosamund Pike should win but she is been unfairly dismissed and it is a shame.Where is Julianes film in the box office?Who is watching it?Who is talking about it?I believe even the bafta will go to Juliane because the bafta voters will want to be in line with the oscars.AMPAS tottally shut out gone girl with just a sinlge nom for Rosamund just to show that she is not in contention.I can live with a Juliane Moore win but its just that the politics in play is just too obvious.Anyway to quote Katrine Hepbourn when she was consoling Audrey Heybourn on her first oscar loss.”Take heart dear you will definately win one you dont derserve one day”
I just hope Rosamund Pike continues her great streak and eventually wins for an equally good (or better if possible) performance.
If it weren’t for Moore, Rosamund would have it in the bag this year.
Anne Dorval for Mommy > this year’s nominees for Best Actress
Cotillard in just about anything > just about anybody – I’m with you there. But the Oscar this year goes to Moore.
Brace yourself for Lady Macbeth next year. 🙂
Cotillard in Rust and Bone > Moore in anything she has ever done
Good arguments, Ryan C. Hope to see more from you.
There’s no contest here – this Oscar goes to Moore. Biggest splash came from Pike and I’m hoping she has a major career ahead because she’s astonishing; but no Oscar this year. Cotillard and Witherspoon have theirs and Jones has lots of roles ahead of her.
There will be no surprises in Best Actress this year.
I’ve only seen Pike’s movie so…
Moore will win because she’s good in Still Alice. Although I’m not comvinced everything she does is magic: A Single Man and The Kids Are Alright were weird performances. And the less said about Hannibal the better…
Is it really now the CW that Redmayne is winning Best Actor? I still think Keaton has a really good shot, despite SAG.
Moore has the Oscar locked. It’s a great performance and she’s way, way overdue. She may or may not win the BAFTA but I don’t think there’s any point in trying to create a race for the Best Actress Oscar where none really exists.
Moore in The Hours > Moore in Magnolia > Moore in Boogie Nights > Moore in A Single Man > Moore in Far from Heaven > Moore in The End of the Affair > Moore in The Kids Are All Right > Moore in Children of Men > Moore in As the World Turns > Cotillard > Witherspoon > Jones > Pike > Moore in Still Alice
Cotillard > Whiterspoon > Pike > Jones > Moore
NGNL: Fiennes wins the BAFTA
Moore should have won for far from heaven . She will win this year but I like Marion’s performance as well. I am hopeing for a tie.
If there’s a discrepancy betw BAFTA and Oscars re Acting awards, the obvious category would be Actor. Assuming Redmayne wins BAFTA, there’s still strong possibilties of Keaton and Cooper winning Oscar (and I’m sure Harvey would love Cumberbatch). I don’t think Actress is as sewn up as the Supportings just because Simmons and Arquette swept the critics while Moore saw Cotillard and then Pike take a lot of precursors. But the Industry is most likely behind a Moore Oscar then the other two: Cotillard already having one, Pike hopefully will get an opportunity in the future. But it’s Actor that’s a toss-up. And if Redmayne wins BAFTA he’s at best a Weak frontrunner. That’s where the discrepancy most likely would occur.
Rob, Sasha did not write this post. We have a new contributor, Ryan C. Flowers, a smart guy with his own opinions. Those opinions will not always match yours, or mine, or Sasha’s. Posts at Awards Daily are not written to fall into lockstep with common consensus. We report the consensus accurately — and then we invite the opportinity for individuals to buck the consensus.
Opportunity to express alternate points of view is a way to stir debate . And, trust me, lively debate is better for the Oscar race than placidly taking things for granted. Take nothing for granted this year. There are too many tight rivalries. Too many thin margins.
If you want to give up and let your voice disappear from this site , how does that achieve anything in your support for Julianne Moore?
If you believe something I write is wrong, or something Sasha writes sounds doubtful to you, or if another reader or contributor to the site says something you disagree with, then stand your ground and speak out passionately for what you believe instead.
I agree that either Pike or Jones could beat Julianne Moore. The race is closer for Bafta than it is for Oscar. However, Patricia Arquette could lose to Keira Knightley or Emma Stone in Supporting.
I saw MAPS TO THE STARS last night (finally), and to be honest, the awards really seem to be going to Julianne Moore’s head. 😀
Felicity Jones is the only real threat to Moore’s BAFTA. I don’t believe the Brits will go for Pike, and unfortunately so.
“So if Redmayne, Moore, Simmons, and Arquette are the likely Oscar winners, then will any of them miss the BAFTA?”
I think it’s just as, if not more, likely that they all win here, but Keaton gets the Oscar (than that Moore lose the BAFTA)…
“But there’s major problem with Jones spoiling Moore’s sweep: Next to the other nominees, her role looks lighter, easier, and less challenging.”
It’s not, though. Her character is a complex, flawed, tormented one. You can’t ignore that just because she never has a major breakdown or screaming match with her husband, or anyone else… It’s a subtle and great performance. Not necessarily better than Moore’s, but a worthy nominee, at least. I get what you’re saying, though – they probably won’t go for Jones. Pike is the real dark horse.
Julianne Moore deserves the BAFTA and especially the OSCAR for her stellar performance this year in ‘Still Alice’. Period.
Sasha girl youre losing your credibility here. Whats up with you with hating julianne moore? First you predicted that jennifer aniston will be nominated at the oscars and will be the eventual winner but alas you failed. And now this? Why cant you be happy with julianne moore? Youre creating a fantasy that it will never be fully realize. Im disguted sasha. Really disgusted. For that you lose a subscriber. Youve become so blatantly bias in every article you posted that its not believable anymore.
I think a compelling argument could be made for Pike or Jones, and I wouldn’t be terribly surprised if either won.
On the other hand, Julianne won the London Film Critics Award, and to do that, she had to beat herself, as she was nominated for Alice and Maps both. Strong support there, I’d say, and I am therefore predicting that she’ll win BAFTA too.