In what can only be ranked as a flat-out, unconditional rave, Justin Chang reviews David Fincher’s Gone Girl for Variety.
A lady vanishes and is soon presumed dead, but it’s her marriage that winds up on the autopsy table in “Gone Girl,” David Fincher’s intricate and richly satisfying adaptation of Gillian Flynn’s 2012 mystery novel. Surgically precise, grimly funny and entirely mesmerizing over the course of its swift 149-minute running time, this taut yet expansive psychological thriller represents an exceptional pairing of filmmaker and material, fully expressing Fincher’s cynicism about the information age and his abiding fascination with the terror and violence lurking beneath the surfaces of contemporary American life. Graced with a mordant wit as dry and chilled as a good Chablis, as well as outstanding performances from Ben Affleck and a revelatory Rosamund Pike, Fox’s Oct. 3 wide release should push past its preordained Oscar-contender status to galvanize the mainstream.
After the perceived commercial disappointment of “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo” (2011), despite an eventual worldwide haul of more than $230 million, Fincher’s latest R-rated, two-and-a-half-hour screen version of a phenomenally successful potboiler will have an easier time translating its considerable pedigree, critical plaudits and awards-season hype into must-see status. It helps that the director is working on a significantly lower budget this time around (about $50 million), from a novel that has neither steeped too long in the public consciousness nor spawned any prior movies. It also helps that “Gone Girl,” unlike “Dragon Tattoo,” registers as more than just a technically immaculate, dramatically superfluous exercise in style.
Making an impressive screenwriting debut (with adaptations of her two other novels in the works), Flynn has ruthlessly streamlined but not materially altered her story, fully retaining its bifurcated, time-shuffling structure and elaborate, spoiler-susceptible twists. (To preserve the purity of the experience, read no further.) The sheer complexity of the narrative finds an ideal interpreter in Fincher, who boasts one of cinema’s great forensic minds, and dissects the marriage of Nick and Amy Dunn (Affleck and Pike) with the same clinical precision and eye for minutiae he wielded in his serial-killer procedurals “Seven” and “Zodiac.” Together, he and Flynn spin this study of a troubled relationship into an extreme portrait of matrimonial hell, as well as a stark metaphor for just how little we may know or trust our so-called better halves…
[More at Variety, if spoilers are not an issue for you.]
>”Fincher is by now well versed in the art of misdirection, and his control of this material is assured and absolute. This is hardly the first time he’s forced us to question what we’re seeing and through whose eyes we’re seeing it (“Fight Club”), or examined the media’s tendency to distort and amplify paranoia (“Zodiac”), or juggled parallel time frames and dueling perspectives so as to complicate our sense of the truth (“The Social Network”). But what makes “Gone Girl” so particularly potent — and such an appropriate match for this filmmaker’s icy view of the human condition — is its deliciously cynical attitude toward the relationship at its core; its sly awareness of the thin line between love and hate, happiness and misery; and its skill at laying bare the cruel, manipulative behavioral patterns that spouses can lapse into over time…
…as its title suggests, “Gone Girl” belongs to its leading lady. Pike is the sort of elegantly composed blonde beauty with whom Hitchcock would have had a field day, and some may well quibble that the actress’s cool British hauteur doesn’t fully capture Amy’s America’s-sweetheart side. Yet as evidenced by her years of solid supporting work, she also possesses the sort of ferocious charisma that magnetizes the screen, and it’s a thrill to watch her fully embrace the showiest, most substantial role of her career. Hers is the low, seductive voice we hear coaxing us through the story’s early passages, and hers is the character who ultimately exhibits the most dynamic range: In any given scene, her Amy can seem vulnerable, aggrieved, calculating, heroic, overmatched, viperous and terrifying.
As ever, Fincher’s behind-the-scenes collaborators turn in work of an exceptionally high standard. His camera unerringly well placed in every scene, d.p. Jeff Cronenweth brings a drab, underlit look to the Dunnes’ McMansion, the police station and other North Carthage locations (actually Cape Girardeau, Mo.), suitably nondescript in Donald Graham Burt’s production design. Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross, whose moody electronic compositions have become synonymous with the director’s work, once again devise a soundscape that all but pulses with dread, this time by lacing more traditional orchestral fare with their trademark synths.
Working without his usual partner Angus Wall (with whom he won Oscars for “The Social Network” and “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo”), editor Kirk Baxter cuts the picture to within an inch of its life while still allowing individual scenes and the overall structure to breathe; this is a movie you sink into even when you’re on the edge of your seat. Particularly fraught, violent moments are heightened by quick fade-ins and fade-outs, a hallucinatory effect that registers as palpably as a shudder.
Spoilers not an issue… for whom, exactly? This is David Fincher, bitch, even the slightest snippet of info on the plot counts as a spoiler in my books!
Just so glad this is getting good reviews. Imagine that guy with an Oscar in his fucking deserving hands.
Yeah I saw that. I don’t really go on RT too much these days either. I can certainly see why Gone Girl is not getting perfect reviews. The subject matter and the book might not be everyone’s cup of tea. And is Fincher still an acquired taste? But the reviews are as promising as I expected. Excitedly so. And so, off I go to read more of the book.
@Robin Write– 12 critics reviews in on Metacritic–score of 87 for now. I bet there are far more reviews at the Rottentomatoes.com database (although I don’t pay too much attention to their Tomatometer…..)
Several film will claim that they are the most critically claimed film of the year. Boyhood is already claimed that tittle unless another film scores 100 on Metacritics. Hamlet in 1601 did not get as good a review on opening night .
Probably my favorite review. You can feel his enthusiasm. And I have been reading reviews of Gone Girl for the last 24 hours. In between reading the book Gone Girl. I may have a problem.
Like Ryan said GRAVITY had minimal editing, but then it had some brilliant work during the action-y parts, a mini-clinic if you will. I haven’t seen the film, but if the whole of BIRDMAN “feels” like one unbroken shot my hunch is they won’t go for it — so no?
Unless they are very impressed by the digital sticking of different shots together to make it seem like one shot, I’ll tell you when I see it. Last year for instance, 12 YEARS had one masterful instance of this kind of digitally-assisted fusions during a really important scene.
At any rate everyone raging about them (including me) should know that by now these shots are seen as rather passé in Mejico.
[ A clip from the Mexican RUSSIAN ARK that actually preceded it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fbeqIn1IeEM ]
I plan to go to a screening next Wed. As far as best picture. This year is like Tiger Woods at his best. Everybody else is playing for second place. Boyhood is this years Tiger Woods
“This is off topic but will Birdman get an Editing nomination…”
For all the justified hoopla made about the relatively barely-edited sequences in Gravity, last year’s Oscar for Best Editing went to Gravity.
Some people made the not-unreasonable argument that the decision to use minimal editing was a bold genius editing choice in itself.
…although another not-unreasonable argument would be that the decision to use such calculated restraint in editing was the director’s decision, not left up to the editor’s prerogative.
But, of course, Cuarón served as BOTH director AND editor on Gravity, so nyah nyah, “she’s my sister! she’s my daughter! she’s my sister AND my daughter! AND he’s my editor AND my director AND my father! shut up, he gets all the Oscars.”
Cirkus, editing shots to make something look like one take is difficult. Making an entire movie look like one take is an incredible undertaking. If Birdman wins editing I wouldn’t be surprised, same goes for cinematography. The “best” editing, to me, is the best way to edit a movie in service of the story.
This is off topic but will Birdman get an Editing nomination because it is supposedly edited to look like one take, or would that be a lack of editing and therefore render it unlikely??
The book was so messed up but I’m thrilled that fincher chose the author to do the script! So I’m super excited to see this now!
OT:
Saint Laurent (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2707848/) was chosen as the French contender for the Foreign Language Film prize at next year’s Oscars, which means that Blue Is The Warmest Color, which given its late release date was also eligible this year, will NEVER EVER be up for an Oscar!
I may see this, although Ben Affleck does not move me to go see his movies. I saw a fantastically written and directed movie yesterday, The Drop. Really good if you haven’t seen it.
fincher is without a doubt one of the 10 best directors on the planet right now and “gone girl” is surely one of the 5 most anticipated films of 2014 by serious lovers of cinema. despite some of the metacritic scores upon initial release- he already has 4 films (seven, fight club, zodiac, and social network) that are widely recognized now as one of the best films of their respective years. if “gone girl” can join “boyhood” and “grand budapest” up there for 2014 that would be awesome.
“just the incessant divulging in sleaze.”
Ironically, I thought the same thing about Fight Club.
I’m anticipating Gone Girl more than I would usually a Fincher movie because his last two movies ended up being my favorites of his. Sounds like he really nailed this one, so I can’t wait to see it.
If you look at the metacritic scores over the years (like Josh), it becomes obvious that Fincher is a director who is more of an acquired taste than most of his mainstream peers (except for TSN, which was universally adored). That’s actually a good thing. Better be divisive than bland and inoffensive, and all that. But whereas his films used to be divisive because they were daring – aesthetically, thematically, morally – I think ‘Gone Girl’ and ‘Dragon Tattoo’ are more divisive thanks to a lack of thematic or moral core, which is more problematic. There’s none of the boldness of, say, ‘Se7en’ or ‘Fight Club’ in these two movies, just the incessant divulging in sleaze.
I adore this review because you quickly tell it’s a rave and then Chang outright tells you not to waste anymore of your time reading him. Genius.
I think Pike has a decent shot (she’s good, definitely, just as good as Mara, if not better). The Oscar prospects of this one depends on the box office, I think. If it’s a big success money-wise it could earn a spot in the extended Bp line-up? Cinematography, score and editing are definite possibilities (it might even be deserved, even though we’ve already seen recent Fincher films excel in similar ways in those three areas). But Pike is a strong bet if the best actress category continues to look as slim as right now. Fincher won’t get in for direction, I don’t think so. But, yeah, 3 or 4 nominations seem likely.
The Hollywood Reporter is not impressed.
“Is that all there is?
I’m glad you offer a counterpoint to Variety’s fanboy review. How many Oscar noms do you see it getting? I still say 3-4 at best.
I saw this at a press screening in Copenhagen recently. It’s true that it’s a funny film (in a brutal way, yes, but still funny), but even though the humor brings a form of release, I still felt this was just as claustrophobic and limited an experience as Dragon Tattoo. There’s nothing interesting about the script, really, that’s the main problem. I haven’t read the book, but I hope it has more interesting things to say than what we’re presented with here. Fincher wants to see us confronted with all the sleaziness and gore of life, but in the end it doesn’t really amount to much of anything. For Fincher the sleaze apparently is a point in and of itself, but it’s getting painful to see him insist on that point all the time.
I feel like his career has stalled at this point. He’s got nothing more to say, so he just says it louder.
The shot of Ben Affleck standing next to his wife’s photo is incredibly moving. It might be the most moving shot of the year.
Fincher is, to me, one of the top handful of directors we have today. He’s one I don’t care who is in it, if I hear he’s directing, I’m all in. I really don’t like Affleck as an actor at all and really didn’t like the book but am very much looking forward to the movie based on Fincher. It SEEMS that movie buffs, for the most part, respect Fincher quite a bit. I was, maybe blindly, assuming that all of his movies had high Metacritic scores so went through his movies on there and was surprised. Leaving out Alien 3.
Se7en – 65 avg score/0 perfect scores
The Game – 61 avg score/0 perfect scores
Fight Club – 66 avg score/6 perfect scores
Panic Room – 65 avg score/0 perfect scores
Zodiac – 78 avg score/ 5 perfect scores
Curious Case of Benjamin Button – 70 avg score/7 perfect scores
Social Network – 95 avg score/28 perfect scores
Girl with the Dragon Tattoo – 71 avg/ 4 perfect scores
I can’t believe Se7en is so low. Honestly, I can’t believe most of his movies don’t average at least 75 to 80.
Gonna be a dork, fanboy, and worse right now.
YAY!!!!!!!! Jumping for joy!!! Geeking the f out!!!
The last time a movie won the Oscar for Best Picture, that at the time of the ceremony, was my favorite movie of the year was 2007 when The Departed won. I obviously haven’t seen it yet, but I know what I like, and I can assume my ass off that this one can and might be my favorite movie of 2014. It’s got all the signs of another Fincher classic, especially in the vein of The Social Network. It looks meticulously edited, and produced. 🙂
@JAMDENTEL, Novel still fresh here, too…..@M1, one gets the feeling that the critics have VERY high expectations for this one going in……
With the novel still fresh in my mind, I say…bring it on.
Not that Metacritic means much at this point, but anyway:
http://www.metacritic.com/movie/gone-girl
Only 12 days away…Can’t wait